We have no proof that your tiny penis is tiny, but we all know it is. We've implemented Republican logic. If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it must be a duck. Trump talks like a racist, and his father was a racist, active member of the KKK, therefore he is a racist. Benghazi emails told me so.
Because you're a denier. You deny global warming, you deny racism, you deny economic prosperity. You're a Republican shill with no self-value. You add nothing to a conversation and your tiny penis is extremely tiny.
I wonder if @Not GOP even knows what a radiosonde is and why it is not a very good tool for the kind of study that the article uses to make its assertion. That article, by the way, comes from a website funded by petrodollars.
You are so very very dumb.
How did it break a historical record when in the geologic data going back 400,000+ years that it has been warmer multiple times? Oh yeah, this is propaganda, not science. Carry on!!I wonder if @Not GOP even knows what a radiosonde is and why it is not a very good tool for the kind of study that the article uses to make its assertion. That article, by the way, comes from a website funded by petrodollars.
Oh sure, ice coverage at the poles shrinking, glaciers melting, warmest weather recorded in most areas of the planet and deniers say there is no warming. Might as well say up is down and down is up.
Carbon Dioxide released through industrial activity is accumulating in the atmosphere is changing the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere. Evidence identifies this rise in CO2 is from industrial sources, not volcanoes.
That said, is the earth warming as fast as NOAA said? There is a lot of data that disputes the agency's estimate of 3 degree rise in 50-100 years. For myself, I'm convinced that it is not warming that fast but I don't claim expertise, I'm just following the debate. @Bugeye has a pretty good argument for disputing surface temperature rate rise estimates. Yet warming is still in progress, only the rate of rise is probably less. And that's a good thing. It gives us time to make the necessary changes to avoid the kind of scenarios that will happen, just farther out in time.
Here is a less hysterical article on the subject.
Did Global Warming Slow Down in the 2000s, or Not?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-global-warming-slow-down-in-the-2000s-or-not/
The global warming “hiatus,” a controversy that spawned congressional hearings and thousands of skeptical blog posts before being curbed last year, is back.
The “hiatus” refers to the observation that global warming has slowed in the past 15 years. The planet is still warming, but just not as quickly as some climate scientists expected it to.
...
...
Now, a group of prominent climate scientists are challenging NOAA’s conclusion in a commentary published this week in Nature Climate Change.
THIS GRAPH SHOWS A “SLOWDOWN” IN RISING TEMPERATURES UNTIL 2010. THE BLACK LINE SHOWS TEMPERATURES AS PREDICTED BY CLIMATE MODELS, AND THE RED LINE SHOWS ACTUAL TEMPERATURES. WARMING HAS RECENTLY INCREASED, BREAKING HISTORICAL RECORDS IN 2014 AND 2015.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, FEBRUARY 24, 2016 DOI:10.1038/NCLIMATE2938
What are you talking about? I don't speak wingnut so pardon me, can you explain what Scientific American published that was propaganda?. Also, can you explain why during that 400k years, there is no record of the kind of temperature rise that the earth experienced over this short of a time?
What this heer "rate-o-decline" mean?
or why CO2 never even came close to 400 PPM in that time either. it never even got over 350 PPM in that time. then it suddenly shot up to 400 PPM.
so does that negate the fact that human activities are causing the earth to warm, or are you just showcasing your hatred for black people again?
I showed you a chart of temperatures over 400K years and several times it rose above our current temperature by a significant amount. Have you forgotten the graph already?
Show me a point, any time during the Earth's history where it's warmed this much in 135 years
you poor dumb idiot.
look at the scale on that chart. None of those increases are nearly as sharp as the one we've seen over the past few decades.
