EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

newgrower89

newgrower89

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
yep, us jews not only control real estate, but the media, television, banking, and the hot dog industry.

if you need further assistance on anti-semitic conspiracy theories, just ask me. i'm whistleblowing all this week and next.
Click to expand...
Ok Budd. You asked for it. I'm going to make a list of the wealthiest people in America and then post next to it which just happen to be kabbalah worshipping fake Ashkenazi Jews that hide under the Torah. I used to think it was bullshit too, then I learned about history. The Rothschild's openly financed every war i Europe in the 1800s. Do you thinj they threw there money away? They were behind the first and second banks of the united States, which were precursors to the federal reserve. The people destroyed the first 2 after major depressions. The bankers tried in 1870 and caused a huge depression but it wasn't enough. Then they created the crash of 1907, and 4 years later we got the federal reserve act of 1913. JP Morgan, Nelson Aldrich (Rockefeller's attorney and senator from NY) and 4 others I can't rememeber off the top of my head, all met in Jekyll Island. Representatives from the biggest banks and railroad industry aka Kuhn Loeb Goldman Sachs, Kahn Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg and brown brothers Harriman. EVERYONE OF THOSE PEOPLE ARE JEWISH or were financed by European Jews. They wrote 2 pieces of legislation one called the federal reserve act and another identical bill under another name for the Republicans. They ran Theodore Roosevelt as a 3rd party to insure victory to Wilson. Then they brought you WWI followed by WWII. All of this is in the historical fact in your newyork times and congressional record. The Jewish banking elite ran a large part of the slave/diamond/gold trade. I'm not talking about all Jews. I'm talking about Ashkenazi Jews that converted to Judaism in the 11th century in the caucus mountain. They are 90% of the Jewish population today and have less "Jewish blood" than the native population they terrorize on a daily basis.

Watch the documentary 911missing links! FUCKING TAKE 2 hours! It lists every Israeli corporation that was involved in 911. Am docs...Google that. Its an Israeli corporation that just so happens to be the switch point for EVERY AMERICAN TELEPHONE company. Google the fox news report saying 60+ undercover mossad agebts were detained after 911...every single one was cleared anc released. They were following around the hijackers according to fox news. Do you remember trumps comments about Muslims celebrating? Well that was based on a report of middle eastern men celebrating hours after 911. Turned out to be 4 mosses agents that were later released. They went on live TV and said thy were there to document the event. FUCKING YOUTUBE IT YOURSELF FOOLS!
 
newgrower89

newgrower89

Active Member
Actually I'm not going to make the list. If anyone cares to not be a sheep they will find it themselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
More math from Reddit

"I've constructed several hypothetical scenarios of how the future states might play out, based on the 538 data. It helps to show just how far behind Sanders is right now.

Scenario 1 - 538 goals



All of my scenarios will be in a table that looks like this. This is simply the possible future delegate spreads, with a column for Clinton, Sanders, and how much Sanders nets (gains or loses relative to Clinton). This scenario represents if Sanders meets all of 538's original delegate goals exactly. Remember, these are the goals that they decided he could attain if he and Clinton were polling exactly even, nationally. As you can see, if Sanders just meets these goals exactly, he only nets 82 delegates in the remaining states. He's currently at a 325 deficit, so that's nowhere near close enough to make it up. Remember, none of this is even taking into account the super delegates.

Scenario 2 - exceed all goals by 10%



Here is what the future would look like if Sanders exceeds all of his goals by 10%. For example, if 538 said he needed to win by 10% in Arizona, in this table he wins by 20%. As you can see, if he does this, he nets 299 delegates. This is closer to catching up to Clinton, but he would still far short by a little over 20 delegates. That's not enough, since the superdelegates will likely favor the majority winner of the pledged delegates. The Sandernistas can drop right now this fantasy that the superdelegates would change the race from a popularly favored Clinton to a nominated Sanders. No way in hell. If anything, they would stay with Clinton even if Sanders edged her out by a little (by some miracle).

Scenario 3 - win each state by 16%



This shows how the future would look if Sanders wins by a flat 16% in each state--ignoring the 538 demographics. I got this number from recent 538 articles, which said that Sanders needs 58% of the remaining delegates. If he gets 58, Clinton gets 42--hence the 16 point spread. Remember the red cells way back in the "past" spreadsheet? They indicate which states Sanders has already won by at least 16 points. He has only done this in 6 states so far, and now he needs to do it in every remaining state, on average. Sure, the map looks better for him going forward, but not this good.

You'll notice that there's an extra column in this scenario. Those represent the five largest shifts Sanders needs in order to reach a 16% win in the respective states. Thus, it will be hardest to reach this 16% benchmark in New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, California, and New Jersey.

Scenario 4 - win big in the big states



This is what it would look like if Sanders meets all of the 538 goals exactly, but exceeds his goals by 20% in the five biggest remaining states. Note from the previous table that 4 of these 5 states are also the hardest to reach the 16% win benchmark, and are thus the hardest to gain momentum in. Obtaining something like this result is much easier said than done. Nonetheless, if he could do this (not likely), he would just barely make up his deficit. If he underperformed in even one small state, this would still not be enough.
I note that the five biggest remaining states hold 56% of the remaining delegates (due to population size). So these five states are more important than all of the rest, combined. Thus we have,

Scenario 5 - what about the small states?



This is the last scenario. This is what it would look like if Sanders met exactly his goal for the five biggest states, and exceeded his goals in all of the smaller states by 20% (again, exceeded with respect to the 538 benchmarks). Since these represent only 44% of the remaining delegates, it's easy to understand why this scenario does not net Sanders enough delegates. Even if he has these blowouts where he exceeds the 538 benchmarks by 20% in all of these states, it doesn't mean much unless he can get a big state or two by very large margins as well.

This is all I came up with. I might make some posts like this in the future, since it will be easy to update these tables with future results. But I think it's clear that Sanders is losing and will lose, so it's probably not necessary."

https://np.reddit.com/r/enoughsandersspam/comments/4avw76/the_numbers_are_looking_really_bad_for_sanders/
Click to expand...
Sandemistas? for shame, Pada.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
So Sanders will lose the nomination. He knew this going in, so he must have an endgame. What is it? Does anyone seriously think he'll accept the vice presidency? What other options might be open to him?

Failing winning the nomination, what can those of us who believed in Bernie and his platform do now to promote our cause?
Click to expand...
wait and see is best..better to have the facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top