Canadian official causes stir with ‘progressive’ speech at UN narcotics conference

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
The Liberal government used its first foray into the global anti-narcotics arena this week to signal a clear shift from the war on drugs philosophy, promising more safe-injection sites, promoting “harm reduction” and touting its plan to legalize marijuana.

The speech by Hilary Geller, an assistant deputy minister of health, caused a stir at the generally staid Commission on Narcotic Drugs conference in Vienna, observers said.

The audience of government and non-governmental organization officials from around the world “erupted in applause” mid-way through the address and gave a prolonged ovation at the end, said Jason Nickerson, an Ottawa-based researcher who is attending the meeting.

The talk not only contrasted with the Harper government’s international stance on drugs, but stood out from the cautious pronouncements most other nations made, said the Bruyère Research Institute scientist, who favours more liberal policies.

“There are some countries here that are coming out and saying important, progressive things,” he said. “But it’s certainly not as explicit as what Canada is saying.”


Postmedia/FileConservative justice critic Rob Nicholson: “There’s nothing safe about taking heroin.”
A Conservative opposition critic had a different reaction, sounding the alarm about Geller’s prediction of more government-sanctioned injection sites – where opioid users can use illicit intravenous drugs under a nurse’s supervision.

While the Supreme Court of Canada ruled such sites legal, the Conservatives passed legislation requiring extensive public consultations and other measures before they could be set up, said Rob Nicholson, the party’s justice critic.

“Drugs that are used at these injection sites, mostly heroin, are dangerous and addictive and they kill Canadians,” said the former justice minister. “I disagree with the idea they are safe. There’s nothing safe about taking heroin.”

Nicholson also stressed that the Conservatives invested hundreds of millions of dollars in drug-abuse treatment and prevention.

Still, the Harper government was generally tough on the issue, implementing mandatory-minimum jail sentences for some trafficking offences and beefing up police narcotics enforcement.

On the world stage, it opposed having international conventions embrace harm reduction, programs that focus on preventing the side effects of illegal drug use — like HIV infection — rather than prosecution.

That put the Conservative government in league with some of the world’s most authoritarian states, said Richard Elliott, head of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.

Related
Under Harper, Canada also failed to condemn the death penalty for drug offences, enforced regularly by nations like Iran and Indonesia, he said.

Geller stressed this week her government opposes capital punishment “in all cases.”

Her stance generally marked a “180-degree” shift, said Donald MacPherson, executive director of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition.

“It was very moving for the Canadians in the room, people who have been working on this issue for 10 years in a context where Canada has been more aligned with China and Russia and Pakistan.”

The Vienna conference is a precursor to the UN General Assembly’s special session on drugs this year, which will consider a possible overhaul of international narcotics treaties and their law and order approach.

‘It was very moving for the Canadians in the room, people who have been working on this issue for 10 years in a context where Canada has been more aligned with China and Russia and Pakistan’

Geller said Canada remains committed to combating illicit drug activities, but believes a comprehensive public-health approach is needed, including prevention and treatment.

Harm reduction is “critical,” she said, referring to needle-exchange programs and safe injection sites, as in Vancouver and as requested by advocates in Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal.

“With one long-standing supervised injection site already operating in Canada, we have recently approved a second, and anticipate that there will be others in future,” said Geller.

She also defended the government’s plan to “legalize, strictly regulate and restrict access to” marijuana. The current approach is not working, with high rates of pot use among young people, thousands of Canadians earning criminal records for non-violent offences and organized crime reaping huge profits, said Geller.

A day earlier, another UN body had chided Canada for its cannabis intentions, which it said violated the international Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
She also defended the government’s plan to “legalize, strictly regulate and restrict access to” marijuana. The current approach is not working, with high rates of pot use among young people, thousands of Canadians earning criminal records for non-violent offences and organized crime reaping huge profits, said Geller.
We can't have that so with out firing a shot we'll be the new drug dealer.
 

jafro daweedhound

Well-Known Member
Nicholson also stressed that the Conservatives invested hundreds of millions of dollars in drug-abuse treatment and prevention.
Nicholson always did have a problem determining the difference between treatment and prevention and prisons...
He also never figured out that cannabis by definition is not a narcotic,

No one in his government could figure out marijuana does not have a "H" in it (Health Canada),
I am just saying if they cant even spell it right can any of their other info about it be right ???

The Conservatives could never get their heads around that there is no WAR ON DRUGS - its a war on people that they just don't like and really don't want around. When the "WAR" is over why don't we round up the conservatives and have them charged with war crimes, I mean if its a war like they say...

and what do the Liberals mean, “legalize, strictly regulate and restrict access to” ???? I was checking in my "bullshit to English dictionary", and it looks like it translates to ," taxed like crazy,... monopolized by a select few friends of government,....and available to ANYONE who wants them exactly how alcohol, tobacco and pringles potato chips are now,

What Canada is really proposing is to take marijuana out of the hands of small time criminals and put it in the hands of government - THE BIG TIME CRIMANALS - where it belongs...
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
I thought the H in marihuana in Canada was because of the US governments patents
so I guess we are mmh patients not mmj
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Why don't we refer to it as Cannabis? That's the proper name. To be honest, I rarely use the terms pot, weed, marijuana when I speak with people...it is something I have had to pay close attention to....it's kind of like the difference between saying I have a grow op and a medical garden. And only the conservatives could lump heroin and mj in the same conversation.
 

jafro daweedhound

Well-Known Member
Why don't we refer to it as Cannabis? That's the proper name. To be honest, I rarely use the terms pot, weed, marijuana when I speak with people...it is something I have had to pay close attention to....it's kind of like the difference between saying I have a grow op and a medical garden. And only the conservatives could lump heroin and mj in the same conversation.
A bud by any other name is still a bud...

I agree with you 100%. Medical / recreational it is all BS for the masses. The government needs its shell games and false flag battles to justify their own existence.
There is definitely a stigma - undeserved - we both know it. For forty years I have been trying to convince the rest of the world differently, Some days are better than others. The whole industry needs to, and is slowly, mature and take its place in society out of the shadows.
Getting some conservative dinosaur(s) to realize and admit their past mistakes is no easy task. I was lucky enough to sit in on the Allard case trial last spring. To see the lengths the government will go to out right lie and be smudge people that are the most in need - that time thankfully - justice prevailed....
 

Medipuffs

Well-Known Member
Why don't we refer to it as Cannabis? That's the proper name. To be honest, I rarely use the terms pot, weed, marijuana when I speak with people...it is something I have had to pay close attention to....it's kind of like the difference between saying I have a grow op and a medical garden. And only the conservatives could lump heroin and mj in the same conversation.
I cannot stand ignorant people that tell me I have a grow op. Its a medical garden and always has been. Stay strong, well eventually educate the ignorance out of them :)
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Why don't we refer to it as Cannabis? That's the proper name. To be honest, I rarely use the terms pot, weed, marijuana when I speak with people...it is something I have had to pay close attention to....it's kind of like the difference between saying I have a grow op and a medical garden. And only the conservatives could lump heroin and mj in the same conversation.
Why don't we? I like it better as it doesn't carry the same stigma, somehow. Marijuana, pot, weed, bud are great names for the rec users, but as a 50 something medical user, cannabis sounds more "refined"!
 

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
Why don't we? I like it better as it doesn't carry the same stigma, somehow. Marijuana, pot, weed, bud are great names for the rec users, but as a 50 something medical user, cannabis sounds more "refined"!
I always try to refer to it when talking about medical uses as cannabis. Using marihuana to me would be like calling a gay person a fa$&&@ or an African American a n&@$?. After all it was the prohibitionists who gave it the marihuana name in the first place
 
Top