420monster
Well-Known Member
Soooooo...... vpn? Ya
Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Rollitup mobile app
Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Rollitup mobile app
man you are really not reading between the lines lolWell, if GWN, a mod, states without qualification . . . "He's still here under a different name" - seems 100% sure to me.
Surprised Sunni was unaware of that.
I'm kinda dense. Explain it to me please lol.man you are really not reading between the lines lol
I see. Well, GWN would disagree with you. He knows, for a fact, the banned member is here under another name. And stated so. Not "I suspect, but can't prove it with physical evidence". Apparently he has insight you do not? Beats me.lets try it again
i can know someone is the same user as a previous banned user like just from forum interactions and posts and being here as long as i have , but if i cant prove it with physical evidence through our system, than i wont ban them because than i could be wrong.
does that make it easier to read between the lines.
i dont think you get it but thats ok no worries manI see. Well, GWN would disagree with you. He knows, for a fact, the banned member is here under another name. And stated so. Not "I suspect, but can't prove it with physical evidence". Apparently he has insight you do not? Beats me.
Guess I'm pretty lucky haha. I love u.yes people have been reinstated from banning, but its rare.
<3Guess I'm pretty lucky haha. I love u.
i dont think you get it but thats ok no worries man
But if he is here on Tor than his IP is hidden so their is no way to prove 100%.I see. Well, GWN would disagree with you. He knows, for a fact, the banned member is here under another name. And stated so. Not "I suspect, but can't prove it with physical evidence". Apparently he has insight you do not? Beats me.
No, don't be surprised. I think Pin was kind of surprised too.Well, if GWN, a mod, states without qualification . . . "He's still here under a different name" - seems 100% sure to me.
Surprised Sunni was unaware of that.
I get what GWN states as fact. No reason not to. Are you saying he's wrong?i dont think you get it but thats ok no worries man
Stop giving my name to people.He is the Fruit Loop King, sunshine on a cloudy day.
And Welcome.
If the system can't prove its him he's cool.. Mods can't do anything that the system doesn't allow...thinking someone is pinworm isn't evidence its an opinion.I see. Well, GWN would disagree with you. He knows, for a fact, the banned member is here under another name. And stated so. Not "I suspect, but can't prove it with physical evidence". Apparently he has insight you do not? Beats me.
Not sure how you can speak for GWN. His comment was unambiguous and left no room for interpretation. If you want to tell him he's not entirely accurate with his assertion, be my guest.Stop giving my name to people.
If the system can't prove its him he's cool.. Mods can't do anything that the system doesn't allow...thinking someone is pinworm isn't evidence its an opinion.
@GreatwhiteNorth you're wrong.. grow some nuts pablo.Not sure how you can speak for GWN. His comment was unambiguous and left no room for interpretation. If you want to tell him he's not entirely accurate with his assertion, be my guest.
Therefore, pinworm is allowed back.His comment was unambiguous and left no room for interpretation.