N.C. passes the 'most anti-LGBT bill in the country'

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
See, somehow you feel I need permissions and you don`t.

I don't need permission to think anything about you or not think anything concerning you.

I would need YOUR permission to interact with you on your property or to use YOUR property though.

If somebody else attempts to give your consent for you....(generally speaking) is that person right or wrong ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No, that`s something you need to respect. The many over the few.

The only time the paper makes a determination how others must live is when that paper is paying for you and your expenses.
Living in the USA is living amongst other people, if you don`t want to, you can leave and find your peace in another location. It`s really about where you are standing when you make a proclamation.

So what you are saying is, a thing that is clearly wrong for an individual to do, can be magically made right, if enough people believe in it or are duped into obeying it ?
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
If we do go with that, you have to re-write this post because you are discriminating and being hypocritical.
Wrong again. The premise of your original argument was incorrect in comparing homosexuals to violent street gangs. If you can't see that, then I'm definitely not here to argue with you about why I may or may not like someone. So I agreed with your assessment so that we could move on.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
I don't need permission to think anything about you or not think anything concerning you.

I would need YOUR permission to interact with you on your property or to use YOUR property though.

If somebody else attempts to give your consent for you....(generally speaking) is that person right or wrong ?

That would depend on the circumstances,... most Firemen don`t knock and ask if they can save you and put out the fire,...
You can`t just ignore circumstances and make claim.

Consent is gonna be in a legality thing depending, again, you ignore circumstances.

You live amongst others.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
So what you are saying is, a thing that is clearly wrong for an individual to do, can be magically made right, if enough people believe in it or are duped into obeying it ?
No.

Like stealing second base is more like I`m trying to show. Safe or out would be someone else`s call. or, Like impeaching our leader, we can`t do it without enough people behind it.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
That would depend on the circumstances,... most Firemen don`t knock and ask if they can save you and put out the fire,...
You can`t just ignore circumstances and make claim.

Consent is gonna be in a legality thing depending, again, you ignore circumstances.

You live amongst others.

No, consent has attempted to be resold as a "legality thing" by some people, but that can easily be dismissed with logic.

Consent of an individual cannot be manufactured by another person or group of people, it can only come from that individual person.

If everybody on this forum said you consented to something you did not consent to, everybody on this forum would be wrong.


A consensus of people all in agreement on a thing that is wrong cannot change that thing to being right or correct.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Wrong again. The premise of your original argument was incorrect in comparing homosexuals to violent street gangs. If you can't see that, then I'm definitely not here to argue with you about why I may or may not like someone. So I agreed with your assessment so that we could move on.

There was no comparison made, I was simply pointing out two different things I dislike. You were in error thinking it was a comparison.

Patronizing me wont make you right or wrong and settles nothing.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No.

Like stealing second base is more like I`m trying to show. Safe or out would be someone else`s call. or, Like impeaching our leader, we can`t do it without enough people behind it.
I don't have a leader. Please don't claim that I do.

If a person attempts to be "my leader" without my consent, they are, in reality, trying to be my master.

Umpires and judges are fallible. Sometimes their opinion agrees with what is, sometimes it doesn't. Yet their opinion can't make a thing that didn't occur, somehow occur.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Wrong again. The premise of your original argument was incorrect in comparing homosexuals to violent street gangs. If you can't see that, then I'm definitely not here to argue with you about why I may or may not like someone. So I agreed with your assessment so that we could move on.

I thought about butting in and expanding the argument by asking a "yeah, but what if they were violent homosexuals" ?



Say for instance a homosexual thinks it's okay to use force to make another person that would prefer not to associate with them, comply? Would the homosexual have a valid right to force another person to bake them a cake ?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
No, consent has attempted to be resold as a "legality thing" by some people, but that can easily be dismissed with logic.

Consent of an individual cannot be manufactured by another person or group of people, it can only come from that individual person.

If everybody on this forum said you consented to something you did not consent to, everybody on this forum would be wrong.


A consensus of people all in agreement on a thing that is wrong cannot change that thing to being right or correct.
There are instances when consent cannot be made by an individual and must be done by a parent or legal guardian. So you need to have play in the stipulations or laws.

The consensus said it`s OK to steal,... second base,...so you`re wrong about that too. There are circumstances that you ignore, so anything in place to deal with that makes you angry.

If everybody on this forum said I consented to something and i said I did not, It`s possible i could be wrong or have reneged.

Again you are ignoring circumstances by being selfish.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
I gotta step ouff the platform now, 4,5,5,6,and 7, with pumpkin faces are getting out of hand and i must lay down some rules and patterns.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You might want to tell that to all the hipsters that reside, in force, where I live in NC.

I do "make it" quite well in NC, thank you. You couldn't carry my wallet's jockstrap. If my net worth dropped your net worth, it would lose money stopping to pick it up. Thanks for playing.
part time blind and shutter installers in the raleigh area make about $14,000 a year.

your wife supports you.

LOL!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ah, good catch. This issue has nothing to do with homosexuals. I guess it doesn't sell as well if you boil it down to the actual facts. Which is, very nice people of different sexual persuasions, pissing in the room that matches their plumbing.

It's a reality thing, which rubs libs the wrong way. They think what's in your head, actually changes the reality of what's in your pants.

Many libs in here obviously self-identify as assclowns, but are still expected to pee-pee in the appropriate lavatory.
maybe if you got a job, started working, and stopped relying on your wife, you would have less time to obsess over who is using what bathroom.

just a thought.
 
Top