EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

[schuylaar]

a little birdie sanders told me 'amazing things happen' when people are ALLOWED to know who's running for PRESIDENT in THEIR country..imagine that!

Bernie Sanders Runs the Table
He CRUSHED Hillary Clinton in Alaska, Hawaii, and Washington.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-washington-alaska-hawaii-caucuses

 

[Rob Roy]

and yet you're posts sound so racist.

I'm not responsible for your poor comprehension or inability to distinguish what you thought you heard vs what I actually said.

A racist believes that a persons race makes them superior to a person not of the racists background. I don't believe that. Good and bad people come in all colors, genders, etc. , so do people with poor comprehension skills.

 

[schuylaar]

I'm not responsible for your poor comprehension or inability to distinguish what you thought you heard vs what I actually said.

A racist believes that a persons race makes them superior to a person not of the racists background. I don't believe that. Good and bad people come in all colors, genders, etc. , so do people with poor comprehension skills.

so if you had a general store in rob royland..everyone is welcome to enter and make purchases?

 

[schuylaar]

I'm not responsible for your poor comprehension or inability to distinguish what you thought you heard vs what I actually said.

.

your right

 

[Rob Roy]

so if you had a general store in rob royland..everyone is welcome to enter and make purchases?

No, not everyone. Proper awareness of bathroom etiquette would be one barrier for some potential patrons.

Race or gender etc, would not be a reason I'd exclude anyone.

 

[NLXSK1]

How on earth would you (of all people) know that? It's clearly not from experience.

I dated this black chick once. She was crazy... I am not talking tee hee hee crazy I am talking serving hard federal time for forgery and check kiting crazy.

It was fun. The sex was good. Her skin color never mattered to me.

 

[bearkat42]

I dated this black chick once. She was crazy... I am not talking tee hee hee crazy I am talking serving hard federal time for forgery and check kiting crazy.

It was fun. The sex was good. Her skin color never mattered to me.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/excuse-me-the-official-bernie-sanders-for-president-2016-thread.879964/page-277#post-12454180

 

[NLXSK1]

https://www.rollitup.org/t/excuse-me-the-official-bernie-sanders-for-president-2016-thread.879964/page-277#post-12454180

If you believed me then it would destoy your whole concept of me as a KKK member and you would have to deal with me as an individual. Naah, that would be too hard.

I dont lie on the internet, I see no reason for it. Other people do so I understand your skepticism.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm not a racist

you're totally not.

but you also think it's rape to serve a peaceful black person.

 

[Rob Roy]

you're totally not.

but you also think it's rape to serve a peaceful black person.

I think it is WRONG for ANY person to initiate force to facilitate a nonconsensual interaction. Therefore a person insisting that another person use their body and their property in ways they'd prefer not to, by definition, isn't being peaceful.

I think people that do force others to interact with them, are using a similar means as a rapist, force.

Thank you for finally admitting that I'm not a racist. I've been crying myself to sleep for years now.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I think it is WRONG for ANY person to initiate force to facilitate a nonconsensual interaction. Therefore a person insisting that another person use their body and their property in ways they'd prefer not to, by definition, isn't being peaceful.

I think people that do force others to interact with them, are using a similar means as a rapist, force.

Thank you for finally admitting that I'm not a racist. I've been crying myself to sleep for years now.

Do you feel the same way about slavery? Lincoln used force to facilitate a non consensual interaction by enacting the 13th amendment, so do you support or oppose that?

 

[UncleBuck]

Do you feel the same way about slavery? Lincoln used force to facilitate a non consensual interaction by enacting the 13th amendment, so do you support or oppose that?

i guarantee that whatever diatribe he goes off on about lincoln can be copied nearly verbatim from a david duke book.

 

[NLXSK1]

Do you feel the same way about slavery? Lincoln used force to facilitate a non consensual interaction by enacting the 13th amendment, so do you support or oppose that?

Slavery was the restrictions of freedoms and rights of a person. They were treated as property. Therefore, it was wrong and is ended.

Rob Roy's world would have no slavery thus no need for anything to be fixed. (just put this in here so we dont have to go on for months about the 13th amendment)

 

[Padawanbater2]

Slavery was the restrictions of freedoms and rights of a person. They were treated as property. Therefore, it was wrong and is ended.

Rob Roy's world would have no slavery thus no need for anything to be fixed. (just put this in here so we dont have to go on for months about the 13th amendment)

"I think it is WRONG for ANY person to initiate force to facilitate a nonconsensual interaction."

So why is it right to initiate force against southern slave owners to facilitate a non consensual interaction; abolishing slavery (13th amendment), but wrong to initiate force against business owners to facilitate a non consensual interaction; equal protection to all citizens under the law (14th amendment)?

Your reasoning seems to depend on the morality of slavery being wrong, but I would argue that it's also morally wrong to deny someone the equal protections the Constitution provides, would you agree?

 

[NLXSK1]

"I think it is WRONG for ANY person to initiate force to facilitate a nonconsensual interaction."

So why is it right to initiate force against southern slave owners to facilitate a non consensual interaction; abolishing slavery (13th amendment), but wrong to initiate force against business owners to facilitate a non consensual interaction; equal protection to all citizens under the law (14th amendment)?

Your reasoning seems to depend on the morality of slavery being wrong, but I would argue that it's also morally wrong to deny someone the equal protections the Constitution provides, would you agree?

Because the fundamental point of the 13th amendment was to make all people free. The part of the 14th amendment I disagree with (and it isnt all of it) is the part where business owners are somehow subordinate to their customers under the law.

I want everyone to have all their rights all the time and not have to pick and choose and give up rights to run a business.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Because the fundamental point of the 13th amendment was to make all people free. The part of the 14th amendment I disagree with (and it isnt all of it) is the part where business owners are somehow subordinate to their customers under the law.

I want everyone to have all their rights all the time and not have to pick and choose and give up rights to run a business.

Do you believe it's morally wrong to deny an American citizen the equal protections the Constitution provides?

 

[ttystikk]

people are people, tty..we all fuck the same.

You'd think so, but differences remain. It's those differences I find so intriguing!

 

[UncleBuck]

Because the fundamental point of the 13th amendment was to make all people free. The part of the 14th amendment I disagree with (and it isnt all of it) is the part where business owners are somehow subordinate to their customers under the law.

I want everyone to have all their rights all the time and not have to pick and choose and give up rights to run a business.

why do you want to make it legal to deny service to peopel based on race?

are you a racist or something?

 

[ttystikk]

Some really good, hard data supported, verifiable reasons us Bernie Backers are so pissed about the obvious media slant against our candidate. Twelve of them, in fact;

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/20-reasons-sanders-voters-are-justifiably-angry_b_9544744.html

 

[schuylaar]

Because the fundamental point of the 13th amendment was to make all people free. The part of the 14th amendment I disagree with (and it isnt all of it) is the part where business owners are somehow subordinate to their customers under the law.

I want everyone to have all their rights all the time and not have to pick and choose and give up rights to run a business.

you can opt for a private business but you will not have the benefit of public..you can't pick and choose under public.