what about 'intent' i.e.; watergate?SELECTIVE COPY AND PASTE? WHY DIDNT YOU INCLUDE THIS PART OF THE ARTICLE?
The chances of criminal charges are slim: In order to bring any criminal cases, prosecutors would have to prove that Clinton and her aides knowingly mishandled classified information and shared it with people who weren't cleared to see it, "a high hurdle in the Clinton case," according to the Post. Comparisons have been made to the cases against Gen. David Petraeus—who knowingly shared classified information with his mistress and then lied to FBI investigators about it—and the late Sandy Berger, a national security adviser for President Bill Clinton who was caught trying to smuggle classified documents from the National Archives in his pants.
The Clinton email controversy is not as serious as the Petraeus case, according to the LA Times,nor as blatant as the Berger case. "Those cases are just so different from what Clinton is accused of doing," Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at American University, told the LA Times. "And the Justice Department lawyers know it."
that's what Nixon got nailed on.
Clinton knowingly intended by the way she had her set-up..her intent was to bypass government regs because SHE didn't want to be inconvenienced.