Embarrassing Trump Audio Exposes Him as Totally Clueless

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Female Trump Supporters Just Feel More Comfortable With GOP Candidate Who’s Openly Horrible To Them


MANCHESTER, NH—Describing the current Republican frontrunner’s frankness on the topic as a welcome change of pace in the crowded race, female supporters of Donald Trump told reporters Monday they simply felt more comfortable backing a candidate who is openly hostile and belittling toward them. “It’s actually pretty refreshing to have a candidate who’s willing to come right out and disrespect women to our faces, rather than trying to conceal their actual views or spin their policy stances as if they’re beneficial to women,” said Trump supporter Laura Coyle, adding that she likes how she knows exactly where she stands with the billionaire due to his straightforward style of calling her gender worthless and disgusting up front. “Sure, I gave Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee a chance. But they just talked in circles like Washington politicians, never offering any straight talk about how they view us as inferior and undeserving of equal treatment or rights. Trump’s a straight shooter, though. What he says is what he believes, which in this case is that most women are either calculating manipulators or repulsive animals.” When polled, Trump’s male supporters indicated their approval for the candidate’s willingness to express his open disdain toward women as well.

http://www.theonion.com/article/female-trump-supporters-just-feel-more-comfortable-51166
Holy shit, that got me till the end!

I was wondering what kind of journalist wouldn't ask any followup questions!

lmao
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Democrats like to pretend that they are the only woman vote because of protecting their "rights".

Besides abortion, what right do the democrats guarantee women that the republicans do not?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Democrats like to pretend that they are the only woman vote because of protecting their "rights".

Besides abortion, what right do the democrats guarantee women that the republicans do not?
every single republican voted against the equal pay for women bill this year.

most of them voted against the violence against women act too.

so as long as you don't mind being treated like livestock, vote republican.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
A guarantee that the front runner of the party won't talk about them like dogs.
I have heard him talk about CERTAIN women.

Never about women as a whole demographic tho.

Do you have something he said that says all women are dogs, or some other lesser creature?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I have heard him talk about CERTAIN women.

Never about women as a whole demographic tho.

Do you have something he said that says all women are dogs, or some other lesser creature?
Trump says about the women in his life:
“Bimbo. Dog. Fat pig,”
“A person who is very flat-chested is very hard to be a ’10,’”
“I like kids. I mean, I won’t do anything to take care of them. I’ll supply funds, and she’ll take care of the kids.”
“You know, it really doesn’t matter what they write, as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”
“That must be a pretty picture. You dropping to your knees.”
“Women. You have to treat them like shit.”

Arianna Huffington as "a dog."
Gail Collin “The Face of a Dog!"
Rosie O'Donnell as "a pig"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/08/so-which-women-has-donald-trump-called-dogs-and-fat-pigs/

By his speech and attitudes expressed above, Trump calls all women bimbos in one way or another. Including you and your daughter if you have one.

So, fine, you like a rough man, one that will put you in your place. Trump the celebrity is extremely unlikable as far as I'm concerned but if you want to watch his reality TV show where he suggests that one of his blonde female contestants get on her knees, it speaks volumes about your daddy issues but its no concern of mine.

The president is elected leader of this nation, more than half of whom are women. He has power to affect the lives of these women and men too. Trump's views of what women are capable of is archaic to say the least. A man with his views towards women as president would roll back much of the progress women have made over the past decades. Maybe you want a world where a total stranger (a very old and dissipated man, nonetheless) can tell you to your face to drop to your knees and expect you to laugh it off. That's not the kind of world I want for the women in my life.
 
Last edited:

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Trump says about the women in his life:
“Bimbo. Dog. Fat pig,”
“A person who is very flat-chested is very hard to be a ’10,’”
“I like kids. I mean, I won’t do anything to take care of them. I’ll supply funds, and she’ll take care of the kids.”
“You know, it really doesn’t matter what they write, as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”
“That must be a pretty picture. You dropping to your knees.”
“Women. You have to treat them like shit.”

Arianna Huffington as "a dog."
Gail Collin “The Face of a Dog!"
Rosie O'Donnell as "a pig"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/08/so-which-women-has-donald-trump-called-dogs-and-fat-pigs/

By his speech and attitudes expressed above, Trump calls all women bimbos in one way or another. Including you and your daughter if you have one.

So, fine, you like a rough man, one that will put you in your place. Trump the celebrity is extremely unlikable as far as I'm concerned but if you want to watch his reality TV show where he suggests that one of his blonde female contestants get on her knees, it speaks volumes about your daddy issues but its no concern of mine.

The president is elected leader of this nation, more than half of whom are women. He has power to affect the lives of these women and men too. His views of what women are capable of is archaic to say the least. A man with his views towards women as president would roll back much of the progress women have made over the past decades. Maybe you want a world where a total stranger (a very old and dissipated man, nonetheless) can tell you to your face to drop to your knees and expect you to laugh it off. That's not the kind of world I want for the women in my life.
Not to mention how that'll automatically strain foreign relations with female world leaders
 

SamsonsRiddle

Well-Known Member
You equate Syrian refugees to members of ISIS with zero evidence. In the US, people are innocent until proven guilty. People like you wish to condemn people until proven innocent.

Refugees are innocent until proven guilty. Don't like it, join ISIS
I didn't even say anything about isis.

Shariah law makes women into farm animals. Have you seen the shit they make their women wear and do? How can you even compare their treatment of women to trump? You can't.
 

SamsonsRiddle

Well-Known Member
You didn't say anything about ISIS, yet you immediately reference Sharia Law.. OK!
I don't understand your reasoning? Are you trying to say anyone who practices shariah law is isis? You do know there are more people than isis in the middle east, right?

I was referencing the refugees, from predominately muslim nations who all rely on shariah law as the foundation of their governing system and way of life. I wasn't talking about the "jv team" as your hero put it.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I don't understand your reasoning? Are you trying to say anyone who practices shariah law is isis? You do know there are more people than isis in the middle east, right?

I was referencing the refugees, from predominately muslim nations who all rely on shariah law as the foundation of their governing system and way of life. I wasn't talking about the "jv team" as your hero put it.
Anyone who practices Sharia Law is a fundamentalist, whose views are incompatible with western civilization

Refugees do not rely on Sharia Law. That's a myth to prevent individuals with Middle Eastern heritage, regardless of any terrorist ties, from immigrating into the US.
 

SamsonsRiddle

Well-Known Member
Anyone who practices Sharia Law is a fundamentalist, whose views are incompatible with western civilization

Refugees do not rely on Sharia Law. That's a myth to prevent individuals with Middle Eastern heritage, regardless of any terrorist ties, from immigrating into the US.
Syria Article 3 of the 1973 Syrian constitution declares Islamic jurisprudence one of Syria's main sources of legislation.[141] The Personal Status Law 59 of 1953 (amended by Law 34 of 1975) is essentially a codified Sharia law.[142] The Code of Personal Status is applied to Muslims by Sharia courts.[143] In Sharia courts, a woman's testimony is worth only half of a man's.[144]


<--weird, seems like lots of countries base their laws on shariah. even the one where most of the refugees are coming from. maybe you are just looking at things from a liberal american point of view.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Syria Article 3 of the 1973 Syrian constitution declares Islamic jurisprudence one of Syria's main sources of legislation.[141] The Personal Status Law 59 of 1953 (amended by Law 34 of 1975) is essentially a codified Sharia law.[142] The Code of Personal Status is applied to Muslims by Sharia courts.[143] In Sharia courts, a woman's testimony is worth only half of a man's.[144]

<--weird, seems like lots of countries base their laws on shariah. even the one where most of the refugees are coming from. maybe you are just looking at things from a liberal american point of view.
Sharia Law is already illegal under the US Constitution so the fear your types try to inject into ignorant or gullible people is completely unfounded. You say don't let them in because they'll bring their archaic beliefs with them when they won't get a foot in the door if they do. Don't believe me? Go try to practice Sharia Law in any part of the country and come back and tell me what happens to you

And a lesson for later: Don't make a mess if you don't want to clean it up
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
what's hilarious is that samsonsriddle is too fucking dumb to notice that he wants his own version of sharia law. christian sharia law, that is.

Wasn't this lady elected by her fellow Kentuckians? Shouldn't she follow the state's laws she was elected to uphold?

Gay is a choice, there's no gay gene. No gay chromosome. Only choices made and accepted by a society out of touch with morality.
You must not know God's Word at all to know that he is against the homosexual lifestyle. Anyone who chooses that lifestyle couldn't be serving him, until they repent.

he wants laws established based on the bible so he can persecute gays.

Who really believes racism is a big problem anymore?
he's obviously a racist.

lol right wing terrorists? the colorado shooter was a right wing terrorist, now? come on
he refuses to condemn right wing terrorism and is opposed to equal rights for women.



so how is his sharia law any different from the other guys' sharia law?
 

SamsonsRiddle

Well-Known Member
Sharia Law is already illegal under the US Constitution so the fear your types try to inject into ignorant or gullible people is completely unfounded. You say don't let them in because they'll bring their archaic beliefs with them when they won't get a foot in the door if they do. Don't believe me? Go try to practice Sharia Law in any part of the country and come back and tell me what happens to you

And a lesson for later: Don't make a mess if you don't want to clean it up
Now that you have taken us further away from the subject, let's go to what you are trying to say now:

In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. <--2 years ago

As the number of court cases that involve conflicts between civil law and Sharia law rise in America, majority of American states have introduced bills banning courts from accommodating Sharia law.

Those bills have been stalled by well-financed challenges in court by Muslim groups that also campaign against politicians who sponsor and/or support such bills. Oklahoma's law banning Sharia law from courts has been struck down, and only seven other conservative states (Louisiana, Arizona, North Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Kansas and Alabama) have been able to pass Sharia law-limiting legislation, and only after watering them to not even mention the word, "Sharia."
The bills all cite “foreign laws” because two federal courts have ruled that singling out Shariah — as Oklahoma voters originally did in 2010 — is unconstitutional.

Maybe you should learn more about shariah law before you point the finger at donald trump as an anti-woman bigot.

In 2009, Hudson County Superior Court Judge Joseph Charles Jr. ruled in S.D. v. M.J.R. that the Muslim ex-husband repeatedly had sexually assaulted his Muslim ex-wife, both before and after their divorce. Following testimony from the Muslim man's imam, however, the judge denied the ex-wife's request for a permanent restraining order against her ex-husband, citing the Muslim man's "belief" and "practices": "The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices."
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Now that you have taken us further away from the subject, let's go to what you are trying to say now:

In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. <--2 years ago
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/sharia.asp

that was a satire article.

Maybe you should learn more about shariah law before you point the finger at donald trump as an anti-woman bigot.
you just can't help but be stupid, eh?

must be why you are a trump supporter.


In 2009, Hudson County Superior Court Judge Joseph Charles Jr. ruled in S.D. v. M.J.R. that the Muslim ex-husband repeatedly had sexually assaulted his Muslim ex-wife, both before and after their divorce. Following testimony from the Muslim man's imam, however, the judge denied the ex-wife's request for a permanent restraining order against her ex-husband, citing the Muslim man's "belief" and "practices": "The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices."
first of all, that case was overturned on appeal.

second of all, the original ruling, which has been thrown out, was not based on sharia law in any way.


http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1280731209222240.xml

But in his ruling, Charles, a former assemblyman and state senator, said he did not feel the husband "had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault . He was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was consistent with his practices and was something that was not prohibited."



the sick idea that you can't rape your wife is popular in conservative and religious circles, but certainly not in liberal circles.

in other words, you once again have more in common with sharia law than us leftists.
 
Top