Clinton, Trump or Gary Johnson

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
Im certainly not feeling the bern or burn

#gonorrhea

No cannabigotry with Bernie brother ;-) And he doesn't have the support in Congress to bankrupt our nation or enact socialism, so I'm game to roll those dice if need be ...

#cannabigotry
 
Last edited:

kaka420

Well-Known Member
His palestine policy kind of disgusts me.
While I don't own guns currently (stupid cannabis and firearms laws) I do support the 2nd amendment, especially big black scary guns which Col Sanders is against.
He also has a very serious federal reserve issue that his supporters prefer to ignore but it damn well exists.... just another politician.

My personal belief is he was hand chosen by Hillary. She thought to herself "who's the worst, most ridiculous person I could run against... ah Burnie." A deal was made, he'll likely get to keep all the donations and at some point he'll fade away after he supports Hillary. I would love to see Col Sanders offshore bank accounts ;) ;)
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
of course you are vehemently opposed to hillary, all braindead, racist, anti-semitic retards have a misogyny streak in them.
I don't support Hillary, and it has nothing to do with racism or misogyny. I don't support her because she's more of the same. She's a pawn of corporate America. They own her.

Do you disagree?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You must have forgotten where this conversation stated and somehow give your ignorant rants credibility (as if you or they have any). Do you honestly believe your own bullshit? A Harvard/Yale lawyer you are not ...



lol, you just replied to yourself.

meltdown.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I don't support Hillary, and it has nothing to do with racism or misogyny. I don't support her because she's more of the same. She's a pawn of corporate America. They own her.

Do you disagree?
i agree that your criticism could be made of almost every single politician in existence.

not sure why people feel the need to try and saddle hillary with it, then never go on to mention a single policy disagreement whatsoever.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
His palestine policy kind of disgusts me.
While I don't own guns currently (stupid cannabis and firearms laws) I do support the 2nd amendment, especially big black scary guns which Col Sanders is against.
He also has a very serious federal reserve issue that his supporters prefer to ignore but it damn well exists.... just another politician.

My personal belief is he was hand chosen by Hillary. She thought to herself "who's the worst, most ridiculous person I could run against... ah Burnie." A deal was made, he'll likely get to keep all the donations and at some point he'll fade away after he supports Hillary. I would love to see Col Sanders offshore bank accounts ;) ;)
bernie is actually very pro gun.

but gun clinging and federal reserve conspiracy theories always go together well.
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
i agree that your criticism could be made of almost every single politician in existence.

not sure why people feel the need to try and saddle hillary with it, then never go on to mention a single policy disagreement whatsoever.
I agree that the vast majority of them fall in to that category. That's where Bernie stands (almost) alone.

I'm a single issue voter this time around.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I agree that the vast majority of them fall in to that category. That's where Bernie stands (almost) alone.

I'm a single issue voter this time around.
yeah, i almost wish bernie wasn't running so i could say "every single politician" instead of "almost every". fucking sanders.

guess i'm feeling the bern.
 

kaka420

Well-Known Member
Oh come on guys, Bernie completely owned by the Federal Reserve, the biggest corporation of them all. I don't understand how you can ignore it?
 

Motorbuds

Well-Known Member
I think it's strange to see people saying they're going to vote for the PRESIDENT depending on where they stand on marijuana. A Governor or something ok, but the president? Come on...

I mean, in the grand scheme of things it's really not that important compared to how bad some of these candidates can help to further wreck this country.

There are larger issues and a lot more at stake than whether someone's pro marijuana or not. I look at being pro marijuana more as icing on the cake rather than a legitimate reason to vote for someone. Call me crazy.
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
I think it's strange to see people saying they're going to vote for the PRESIDENT depending on where they stand on marijuana. A Governor or something ok, but the president? Come on...

I mean, in the grand scheme of things it's really not that important compared to how bad some of these candidates can help to further wreck this country.

There are larger issues and a lot more at stake than whether someone's pro marijuana or not. I look at being pro marijuana more as icing on the cake rather than a legitimate reason to vote for someone. Call me crazy.
It's not just about marijuana brother, it's about getting away from the establishment politics and public corruption of the current dichotomy exploited by the Democrat and Republican parties.
 

kaka420

Well-Known Member
It's not just about marijuana brother, it's about getting away from the establishment politics and public corruption of the current dichotomy exploited by the Democrat and Republican parties.
He's running on the democratic ticket dude and he votes with them more often than not. Burnie is the establishment, but he talks the good talk, doesn't walk the walk. You know the whole actions speak louder than words.
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
He's running on the democratic ticket dude and he votes with them more often than not. Burnie is the establishment, but he talks the good talk, doesn't walk the walk. You know the whole actions speak louder than words.
I do not believe Motorbuds was being specifically anti Bernie-I (or Gary Johnson-LP), but rather pro status quo establishment (D and/or R), ie the chosen ones. Can you think of another civilized nation controlled by two political parties for centuries :confused:

 
Last edited:

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
He's running on the democratic ticket dude and he votes with them more often than not. Burnie is the establishment, but he talks the good talk, doesn't walk the walk. You know the whole actions speak louder than words.
How is he the establishment? Have you looked at his voting record, or where his campaign contributions are coming from?

He's a departure from the typical crooked, corporate America backed candidates that we've had to choose from over the past 40 years. You can disagree with his ideas, but to say that he's "the establishment" leads me to believe that you're not paying attention.
 
Top