How's that when the people Sanders has brought in want regulation of the financial industry and Clinton has been taking campaign contributions and giving hundred thousand dollar speeches to... the financial industry...?
Why is there a significant "Bernie or bust" movement within the democratic party?
Why are people like londonfog tirelessly promoting the idea that if you support Sanders, then you also must support Clinton?
The people Sanders has brought into the political process are largely opposed to Clinton and the moneyed interests that influence politics. Her only saving grace is the appointments to the Supreme Court and the fact that the republican party is in shambles. If there were a strong republican candidate facing Clinton who argued legitimate issues and dropped the fundamentalist rhetoric, she would be in trouble. The idea that "well, she's the best they have to offer" is a far cry from a presidential run like Lincoln or FDR faced.. She will largely be seen as the best of the worst presidential options unless her administration pulls off something significant.