Anomymous blows the lid off of Hillary C.....

Rrog

Well-Known Member
This idiotic quote makes this article a non-starter:

"Electing her means allowing someone ten times worse that Barack Obama ever dreamed of being make the decisions that will likely ruin our nation."

Who would read beyond that winner of an opener?
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
This idiotic quote makes this article a non-starter:

"Electing her means allowing someone ten times worse that Barack Obama ever dreamed of being make the decisions that will likely ruin our nation."

Who would read beyond that winner of an opener?

For real.

Its totally like 8 times at best. He wasn't THAT bad...
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Saw an interview with Judge Napitano yesterday, a highly experienced and intelligent man who I respect. In a nutshell he said that Hillary's email and security infractions are "exponentially greater than Patraeous" and said she will be indicted for her security breaches.

He cited law, the players now involved. The Clintons have been as slippery as a barrel full of eels but this time it may be the nail that shuts her down.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Saw an interview with Judge Napitano yesterday, a highly experienced and intelligent man who I respect. In a nutshell he said that Hillary's email and security infractions are "exponentially greater than Patraeous" and said she will be indicted for her security breaches.

He cited law, the players now involved. The Clintons have been as slippery as a barrel full of eels but this time it may be the nail that shuts her down.
Or not... She isnt going to jail, Obama will pardon her. She may not be the Democratic nominee but I have been saying that for at least a year now.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Or not... She isnt going to jail, Obama will pardon her. She may not be the Democratic nominee but I have been saying that for at least a year now.
I agree.

This is worth a read. Bitch was too stupid to wipe the server. Probably just hit DELETE key. I didn't realize this was such a huge development.
It is almost inconceivable that all of his emails have been lost. Surely this will intrigue the FBI, which has reportedly been able to retrieve the emails Mrs. Clinton attempted to wipe from her server.
ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The bad legal news for Hillary Clinton continued to cascade upon her presidential hopes during the past week in what has amounted to a perfect storm of legal misery. Here is what happened.

Last week, Mrs. Clinton’s five closest advisers when she was secretary of state, four of whom remain close to her and have significant positions in her presidential campaign, were interrogated by the FBI. These interrogations were voluntary, not under oath, and done in the presence of the same legal team that represented all five aides.

The atmosphere was confrontational, as the purpose of the interrogations is to enable federal prosecutors and investigators to determine whether these five are targets or witnesses. Stated differently, the feds need to decide if they should charge any of these folks as part of a plan to commit espionage, or if they will be witnesses on behalf of the government should there be such a prosecution; or witnesses for Mrs. Clinton.

In the same week, a federal judge ordered the same five persons to give videotaped testimony in a civil lawsuit against the State Department, which once employed them, in order to determine if there was a “conspiracy” — that’s the word used by the judge — in Mrs. Clinton’s office to evade federal transparency laws. Stated differently, the purpose of these interrogations is to seek evidence of an agreement to avoid the Freedom of Information Act requirements of storage and transparency of records, and whether such an agreement, if it existed, was also an agreement to commit espionage — the removal of state secrets from a secure place to a non-secure place.

Also earlier this week, the State Department revealed that it cannot find the emails of Bryan Pagliano for the four years that he was employed there. Who is Bryan Pagliano? He is the former information technology expert, employed by the State Department to problem-shoot Mrs. Clinton’s email issues.

Mr. Pagliano was also personally employed by Mrs. Clinton. She paid him $5,000 to migrate her regular State Department email account and her secret State Department email account from their secure State Department servers to her personal, secret, non-secure server in her home in Chappaqua, N.Y. That was undoubtedly a criminal act. Mr. Pagliano either received a promise of non-prosecution or an actual order of immunity from a federal judge. He is now the government’s chief witness against Mrs. Clinton........

More of her slimeball spinning -
But Mrs. Clinton is no ordinary client. She is running for president. She lies frequently. We know this because, when asked if the FBI has reached out to her for an interview, she told reporters that neither she nor her campaign had heard from the FBI; but she couldn’t wait to talk to the agents.

That is a mouthful, and the FBI knows it. First, the FBI does not come calling upon her campaign or even upon her. The Department of Justice prosecutors will call upon her lawyers — and that has already been done, and Mrs. Clinton knows it. So her statements about the FBI not calling her or the campaign were profoundly misleading, and the FBI knows that.

Watch The Five on FOX. They had the judge on the other day and he discussed these events. Just frickin' amazing how this is gonna turn out. :clap:

I can only hope justice is served.
 

thetr33man

Well-Known Member
Hillary is as crooked as the day is long IMO. I hope she is nominated cuz I think Bernie might actually have a shot at winning....
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
It will be so much fun bringing up theses quotes once Hillary Rodham Clinton is sworn in as President 45. I will drink your tears

You sound gleeful at the possibility of drinking another man's bodily fluids, not that there's anything wrong with your glee, don't worry, we won't tell your "no motor cycle for you wife."
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You sound gleeful at the possibility of drinking another man's bodily fluids, not that there's anything wrong with your glee, don't worry, we won't tell your "no motor cycle for you wife."
You do realize Big Foot does not exist. Only fraud perpetrated by fraudsters. I guess you know this by the fraud you bring to this site.
When you use your social security number, do you feel proud to be an American
 

SSHZ

Well-Known Member
I believe the president has to wait 2 years before he can pardon someone......I may be wrong, but it may be correct.

The movie about "Clinton Cash", about to be played at the Cannes Film Festival will be another stab in the back for her. There is so much going on with her right now, it's only getting worse week by week. And with Valerie Jarret throwing her under the bus, Obama will not be her defender in the end.

The Dem's are peeing in their pants right now....they know it's not good!
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
I believe the president has to wait 2 years before he can pardon someone......I may be wrong, but it may be correct.

The movie about "Clinton Cash", about to be played at the Cannes Film Festival will be another stab in the back for her. There is so much going on with her right now, it's only getting worse week by week. And with Valerie Jarret throwing her under the bus, Obama will not be her defender in the end.

The Dem's are peeing in their pants right now....they know it's not good!
Ford pardoned Nixon the day he took office....see the republicans do it
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Bernie should run as her VP for sure if he doesn't get the nomination. If Hillary gets convicted after the election he will become president by default & he can pardon her....win-win
 
Top