GOP anti democracy action in Virginia. Why so scared of more voters?

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
GOP sues to block McAuliffe order to let 200,000 Virginia felons vote

“Today Republicans filed a lawsuit to preserve a policy of disenfranchisement that has been used intentionally to suppress the voices of qualified voters, particularly African Americans, for more than a century,” he said in a written statement. “These individuals have served their time and are now living, raising families and paying taxes in our communities — this suit is an effort to continue to treat them as second-class citizens.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/gop-sues-to-strip-209k-felons-from-va-voter-rolls/2016/05/23/ef2587a8-20e4-11e6-aa84-42391ba52c91_story.html

Hmm, 200,000 people are now able to vote after Democratic Governor McAuliffe signed an order to restore their voting rights. What, exactly are those GOP crackers so afraid of? Maybe its that Virginia's government will have to serve everybody instead of just klansmen?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Higher voter turnout tends to favor democratic candidates. That's why republicans complain about non existent voter fraud and requiring a photo ID to vote, even though you have to prove who you are when you register..
Click to expand...
Too funny this. The GOP of VA only wants its own to be able to vote. Understandable, I guess for people still pining for the Ole South. The times are changing and the GOP is failing to keep up.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Same shit in Wisconsin.
They also want to suppress the college vote. Knowing out of state students would rather keep their out of state licenses or not go out of their way during the school week to get a Wisconsin state id
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Same shit in Wisconsin.
They also want to suppress the college vote. Knowing out of state students would rather keep their out of state licenses or not go out of their way during the school week to get a Wisconsin state id
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, Republicans love to talk freedom but what they mean is centralized authority.
 
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Same shit in Wisconsin.
They also want to suppress the college vote. Knowing out of state students would rather keep their out of state licenses or not go out of their way during the school week to get a Wisconsin state id
Click to expand...
Out of state college students should not get a vote as long as they are maintaining their perminant domicile outside of the state.

On what Fucking planet does it make sense to let people from Illinois to vote in Wisconsin just because they go to school there but still have their primary life outside of the state?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Oh yeah, Republicans love to talk freedom but what they mean is centralized authority.
Click to expand...

All forms of government which use involuntary inclusion of its subjects as a requisite, are based on central authority, Comrade Foggy.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
Out of state college students should not get a vote as long as they are maintaining their perminant domicile outside of the state.

On what Fucking planet does it make sense to let people from Illinois to vote in Wisconsin just because they go to school there but still have their primary life outside of the state?
Click to expand...

Panarchia, (which isn't really a planet by the way).

However the concept of unbinding geography as a restriction on political affiliation is a component of Panarchy.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That is not accurate, given that there's a plethora of duress people face on a daily basis.
Click to expand...
like forced integration?

you ran away and never answered my simple, simple question about how you personally are forced to integrate.

don't be afraid, you white supremacist scumbag. tell us all about the nightmare you face.
 
Elwood Diggler

Elwood Diggler

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
Out of state college students should not get a vote as long as they are maintaining their perminant domicile outside of the state.

On what Fucking planet does it make sense to let people from Illinois to vote in Wisconsin just because they go to school there but still have their primary life outside of the state?
Click to expand...


primary life outside the state? you do realize these college kids live full time in the states they attend school right?
 
Corso312

Corso312

Well-Known Member
I wish someone would challenge this in the SC, it has to be unconstitutional to strip citizens of voting rights..there's like 6-7 states pulling this horseshit.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
like forced integration?

you ran away and never answered my simple, simple question about how you personally are forced to integrate.

don't be afraid, you white supremacist scumbag. tell us all about the nightmare you face.
Click to expand...

Your question is asked in such a way as to appear poignant, and cast me as a villain.

Except for one thing, I don't believe ANYBODY should be forced to interact with a person they'd prefer not to, on their OWN property.

That includes people of all races, gender, quasi gender, belief, etc. who should be able to determine the use of their OWN property and their OWN bodies.

You think it is okay to force a black person to interact with somebody on their own property when they'd prefer not to.

Why do you think a black person should put up with a KKK hood wearing douche parading around in his store? He should be able to tell the douche get the fuck out of here shouldn't he? Or should another entity that doesn't own a given property force the black guy to give up his right to control his own body etc. ? Sounds like you want to control people using force, which are slave master tactics. I can't go along with your slave master logic, sorry.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Why do you think a black person should put up with a KKK hood wearing douche parading around in his store?
Click to expand...
no one is born with a klan hood on, white supremacist. everyone is born with a skin color though.

it is already legal for a black person to kick a klanman like you out of his store, pedo. you complain that it is illegal for a klanman to kick a black person out of his store though. but only because you are a white supremacist.

so tell me, white supremacist, how are you personally forced to integrate?

you have dodged this question many, many times now, white supremacist.

why is it so hard for you to answer this simple question?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Bakers included in a gay wedding may not be voluntary. If they refuse they may be sued...
Click to expand...
or they could just make their store a private one instead of a public one if they are as bigoted, intolerant, and hate filled as you and your fellow white supremacists are.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no one is born with a klan hood on, white supremacist. everyone is born with a skin color though.

it is already legal for a black person to kick a klanman like you out of his store, pedo. you complain that it is illegal for a klanman to kick a black person out of his store though. but only because you are a white supremacist.

so tell me, white supremacist, how are you personally forced to integrate?

you have dodged this question many, many times now, white supremacist.

why is it so hard for you to answer this simple question?
Click to expand...

Whether something is legal or not, shouldn't determine if a person has a right to do it or not. Legality is just a stroke of a pen on a scheme put together by a band of thieves who purport to represent people with OR WITHOUT their consent.

If a black person or anyone else, owns himself and his property why should another person(s) determine what he will do with it?

Other people should concern themselves with their own property shouldn't they ?



I've not answered your silly question, because it's not relevant.

The question should be "who can delegate a right they do not possess" ? I say nobody should, you disagree which makes you a person who condones removing a persons consent as a component of your permissible actions. That's what a rapist does by the way.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Whether something is legal or not, shouldn't determine if a person has a right to do it or not. Legality is just a stroke of a pen on a scheme put together by a band of thieves who purport to represent people with OR WITHOUT their consent.

If a black person or anyone else, owns himself and his property why should another person(s) determine what he will do with it?

Other people should concern themselves with their own property shouldn't they ?



I've not answered your silly question, because it's not relevant.

The question should be "who can delegate a right they do not possess" ? I say nobody should, you disagree which makes you a person who condones removing a persons consent as a component of your permissible actions. That's what a rapist does by the way.
Click to expand...
so obviously you don't get the distinction between refusing service to someone because of their decisions, like wearing a klan hat (an item of clothing found in your closet no doubt) and refusing service to someone based on what skin color they were born with, a racist and now illegal idea which you want to see made legal again.

and also, you are too much of a pussy to tell me how you are personally affected by "forced integraytion" as you call it when you complain endlessly about it.

yet now you say it is not even relevant.

nice dodge once again, white supremacist. not really though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top