I didn't know that. I thought if you were a patient at some of them etc.
Frightened yes. I might be assuming incorrectly but most of you are pretty young. I'm not. I'm an early 50's father of two teenaged girls.
I love the new cannabis culture. I'm excited to be part of it. However...
Almost every single youtuber I see, instagrammer all encourage toking in cars and on the move. Wtf? It should be thought of as alcohol is. It alters your state of consciousness even in the slightest. And everyone says, "this is a great little pipe for stashing in your glove box". It's wrong. It's sending the wrong message. There's absolutely no one talking about this. Drinking responsibility has been around for a while now but for some reason it doesn't apply to weed. And now you're defending opening hundreds of these with easy access. Of course everyone's upset.
So yeah I'm scared.
I'm also conflicted.
There's no doubt about the 'pot star' demographic but treating a substance that is not alcohol like alcohol is wrong.
Cannabis does not metabolize in the same fashion as Alcohol(Ethanol) does, and is not made up of the same ingredients. The 0.08 blood level was arrived at as a general indicator of when someone should not be driving, there is no such consensus when it comes to the blood levels regarding cannabis, despite what some biotech firms hoping to patent the new 'standard' test that police departments will use. One case of 'drugged driving' was already thrown out of court for just this reason. Also keep in mind that being excessively tired and driving has been shown to 'alter your consciousness' in the same way alcohol does, and yet we don't have interlock devices for testing fatigue.
There are also a raft of studies showing cannabis legalization has had no impact (sometimes the reverse) of increasing highway fatalities, the 0.50ng/ml was some bullshit number I-502 in Washington had tacked on. Some studies indicate drivers are more likely to drive safely after ingesting cannabis, but I'd stop short of saying it's a great idea. The manner in which it is similar to alcohol is it's up to the individual to judge for themselves. Drunk driving is a huge, huge problem, and all the 'legal frameworks' aren't going to stop someone who doesn't care about endangering themselves or others from getting behind the wheel.
There are absolutely people talking about drugged driving. Blair has mentioned it ad nauseum, it's usually the first fear-mongering tactic thrown up by prohibitionists that the devil's lettuce will make everyone commit massive vehicular manslaughter, etc. We know from other legalized jurisdictions that the fear tactics don't match up to reality. Is it a good idea to do a sheet of shatter and drive? Not really. Should users be banned from driving? Also no. If legalization entails something like that, it will most definitely be seen as a s.7 violation/overreach and be tossed in court.
As far as 'easy' access, it's no easier for someone under 18 to get weed from a dispensary than to get cigarettes or liquor from the appropriate outlets (and far easier for them to get it from their local school dealer). I'm really not sure where this perception that dispensaries will kidnap kids and force them to smoke weed comes from, but it's just FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). So I really don't know what to tell you here, I'd be more afraid of 'easy access' to both alcohol and tobacco, both substances proven to be far more damaging to humans / children than cannabis is.
And sorry, but your entire line of reasoning is either an appeal to age or emotion (think of the children). The facts don't back up the fear.