Is it possible that NASA faked the moon landing?

cannabineer said:
Helium at high pressures (not forces) was used to pressurize the actual propellants. N2O4 and MMH iirc. Engine was throttlable form 10 to 60 per cent rated thrust. Kids these days.
Click to expand...

Yes, and they say they used a rubber bung designed to pop out when the tanks got low so they would not explode. Like a rubber bung could survive the Van Allen radiation belts and the thermospheric temps reaching to 2600 F. It's laughable. I call BS.
 
Cellulose film degrades at 150 F while the moon surface temps are 260 F. When the sun is out. I call BS on the studio photos.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
Yes, and they say they used a rubber bung designed to pop out when the tanks got low so they would not explode. Like a rubber bung could survive the Van Allen radiation belts and the thermospheric temps reaching to 2600 F. It's laughable. I call BS.
Click to expand...
Temperature tells only part of the tale. The other part is pressure. Both are needed to impart heat.

Did you know that the Chinese make heat shields out of oak wood impregnated with epoxy?
 
cannabineer said:
Temperature tells only part of the tale. The other part is pressure. Both are needed to impart heat.

Did you know that the Chinese make heat shields out of oak wood impregnated with epoxy?
Click to expand...

Nope I hadn't heard that. Thanks for helping my argument. :)

Compelling evidence of phony Chinese mission.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
you mean like my grow cab? :)
Click to expand...
... but way more discreet.

d3659f63edc9818f168cf0c36a0f868f.jpg
 
Dr.Pecker said:
Start with the pictures that were already posted. I'll get some original nasa pictures afterword.
Click to expand...

Anything specific you want to see? Or, am I just pointing out what I think is incorrect / giving reasons why?

Once I can see the depth of the specific portions of the images I can tell what type of work would have been done to the document.

Anyway, no problem. But, I'm not jumping aboard this thread to get into the argument, I prefer to remain neutral. Just here to give credence to my screen name lol
 
Favorite lines " We need it made in 7 days.
We'll double your money. Do you think I'm a whore, I'm an artist.
We'll triple the money. Ok. "

 
Last edited:
would solid fuel rockets work in a vacuum? according to newtons 3 rd law for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, when the hypothesis that they do not work in a vacuum was "disproved" on mythbusters they vacuumed out a chamber put a small solid fuel rocket motor on a toy car and the thing took off after a brief delay, my contention is that was only a vacuum briefly before it was a gaseous enviro from the burnt rocket gases allowing the ejected gas to react with the newly created environmental gas, in the vacuum of space there would be no resistance to the expelled gas therefore is it possible for rocket motors to produce thrust in a true continuous vacuum such as space?
 
2ANONYMOUS said:
compare the sole print of They do say this is the suit that Neil made is first step on the moon tell me how can this be you do not need mathematics to see clearly haha its Fucking kindergarden

Click to expand...
L89-0008.jpg

They had booties on, the boot argument is a moot argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top