I'm not being argumentative, just trying to gain an understanding of your perspective. Whether or not the new medical program is treated as legislation or a Gazette, the end result is it will have to satisfy the court decision and be able to withstand a constitutional challenge.What do you they will introduce that will violate our rights, and why do you think they will want to continue the war against patients, which they historically lose and with legal rec imminent? There would be no political benefit and a lot of negative press.
No problem dude, more questions are better than less.
So, from Philpott's comments I think they will relax the ridiculous LP regs, and introduce some kind of subsidization and/or price cap. I don't see them jumping into storefronts just yet, but you can bet when they do it'll be LP only, or the 'clinics' those slimeballs are setting up now.
As for growing, renters will for sure be excluded, or with regs so draconian a landlord would have to be an idiot to allow growing.
If they actually do include home grows, it will probably be reduced plant count based on the 5g/day 'average' HC came up with during Allard. They'll probably leave room for municipalities to completely forbid home grows, at which point it's a new lawsuit against cities (or a city to get a satisfactory precedent).
Then there's the whole issue of seeds. Will they say 'you can only grow cuttings/seeds from LP's'? Will they make all the quasi-legal seed sellers fully legal?
On inspections, they'll probably make you register your address at least with the city, if not the realtor registry all the realtor companies are pushing for. So when your NIMBY neighbour decides the smell from your grow will make them lose their hair or whatever they'll complain to the city, and that shitshow will go on for months.
So basically even if I am wrong and they do include grows, there's plenty for them to fuck us over with.