Mellowman2112
Well-Known Member
Guy gets three years for arguing with a jew.
See why I am not going to give any information about myself?
See why I am not going to give any information about myself?
Right you must have deleted it by now, judging by your statement. That's how you roll.Citation required.
Didn't intend to actually call pablo out again. Yes, I included a wee bit of gripe, or more like, my opinion of what he was doing. That may not have been appropriate to dealing cleanly with your question and my reply. However, for the first time, i shed more detailed light on the context of the earlier situation regarding the infamous 'screenshot', that I was again and again, taunted with. I have only agreed to not reply to the guy on the forum, not to suppress the situation altogether. However, I don't intend on being passive aggressive, or calling him out further, 'for the record' heh.I don't know, Abe.
If you had kept it to paragraph 1, I would have accepted without condition.
But the fact that you bundled it with calling Pablo out - after you shook on a truce - makes me wonder how honest you are being right now.
I'm gonna wait and see. I withhold judgment for now, but I must say ... you complicated matters with the bundling, not simplified them.
I must say, this is not how a guiltless person would do it.
Ok, I understand, what was the argument I was making and I will try to find an acceptable source.Again, you seem confused. Credible and mainstream are not mutually exclusive.
I have never deleted a single post. Use the search feature at the top of the page.Right you must have deleted it by now, judging by your statement. That's how you roll.
about a poundView attachment 3699809 nice, how much dick does she bench ?
No, it does not mean that.I guess this means you went back on your word to @pabloesqobar about the truce huh. Well that didn't last long.
Yup, as I figured gone without a trace. I've got your number man.I have never deleted a single post. Use the search feature at the top of the page.
I'll wait.
Or GermanyDAvid Irving was arrested in Germany for making the same arguments I am and did serious time. A wise man once said, to know who rules over you ask yourself who am I not allowed to criticize.
867-5309?Yup, as I figured gone without a trace. I've got your number man.
Yeah or Germany or Spain , or Belgium etc etc etc etc etc etc over 30 countries have these laws. Coming to the good ole usa soon. Along with the removal of guns.Good thing were not in Australia huh
As false as your law degree. The mods have some kind of source control - they'll have records of all deleted posts.Yup, as I figured gone without a trace. I've got your number man.
i bet it was a flat universityAs false as your law degree. The mods have some kind of source control - they'll have records of all deleted posts.
This is the post you're looking for, guy:
https://www.rollitup.org/t/is-the-world-flat-the-flatlanders-theory.895220/page-102#post-12651955
Underdeveloped research skills. Makes me wonder how you got through university.
You must be joking. I've just had to skip about 30 pages of this thread to get up to date cos I started to feel like I was stuck in the past. I'm not going back there. Why don't you go back and read through every credible piece of information that has been provided to you and then see how you have never answered a question clearly and maybe replace the nonsense created by other people you've supplied so far in your effort to dispute science with actual, credible facts? By credible I mean proven, not Fox news.Ok, I understand, what was the argument I was making and I will try to find an acceptable source.
That, or the kind that's full of shit.i bet it was a flat university
Yes that is when you flip flopped and instead of being just a religion you suddenly became all of the above.Again, the hate speech from one person isn't representative on an entire race, religion, gender, creed, ...
Good because FOX news is total bullshit, we can agree on that at least.You must be joking. I've just had to skip about 30 pages of this thread to get up to date cos I started to feel like I was stuck in the past. I'm not going back there. Why don't you go back and read through every credible piece of information that has been provided to you and then see how you have never answered a question clearly and maybe replace the nonsense created by other people you've supplied so far in your effort to dispute science with actual, credible facts? By credible I mean proven, not Fox news.
Or Unseen at least.i bet it was a flat university
Here is the quote:Yes that is when you flip flopped and instead of being just a religion you suddenly became all of the above.
Do you have learning difficulties? Genuine question.Again, the hate speech from one person isn't representative on an entire race, religion, gender, creed, ...