This is the politics form. What is it for if not discussing where we disagree? I could agree with you if you'd like, but then we would both be wrong.
Im not interested in tit for tat, and you've lost my interest and this is why..
-I bring up a peeve of mine about how US citizens excludes other Countries in the western hemisphere then referring to the term "Americans";.... that there's not one legal document set forth by anyone in the world, outside the US, that states this; that some people, including myself find this irrationally annoying.
You respond with no facts other than the statement "you're wrong", and respond with North America and South America are not on the same continent, when were again, no world census that says so, in fact, only in the US do they feel this way.
-You must be right. Why? ..because US logic.
- I call him Americus, because he signed his documents this way, because he was educated by the church, because he spoke and wrote in Latin like most people people where he traveled and correspond with, and because I chose to call him a name which he actively used.
- You called me wrong because Americus is a hick town in Georgia; ...because of his birth place, as if people don't spell names differently based on your upbringing,
-You must be right. Why? ..because US logic.
Then, with nothing to do with my original point, you talk about how people magically forgot how to speak/write Latin, especially the wealthy.
You speak nonsense... but hey, you must be right. Why? ..because US logic.
US logic trumps all! Why, because US logic says so...
