Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cannacat said:
Let me assure you, as someone that spends a lot of time on RIU jealously eyeing up beautiful outdoor grows with monster plants that are visible from miles around and then has to pay £35 into an electric meter every week to run indoor lights that then raise the worry of hiding heat signatures.... Pot laws are certainly not uni-fucking-versal! It's a sore point!
Click to expand...

Well yes you are very right about that. I stand corrected.
 
srh88 said:
i do know that.. therefore your dome idea is wrong.. if we were in a sealed environment, itd be way warmer towards the top
Click to expand...

Your observation makes me lean more toward an infinite plain. It also appeals to my desire for more uncharted lands to explore. Maybe the next New world will be a puddle a few thousand miles past the rim of Antartica. Wouldn't that be awsome?
 
tyler.durden said:
That's not what the theory states, idiot. Fuck uni, you didn't pass HS...
Click to expand...

Newton's law of universal gravitation. Newton's law of universal gravitation states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Same fucking thing whiner.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
Your observation makes me lean more toward an infinite plain. It also appeals to my desire for more uncharted lands to explore. Maybe the next New world will be a puddle a few thousand miles past the rim of Antartica. Wouldn't that be awsome?
Click to expand...
more land would of been found by now... you really dont think its been explored by now?
 
srh88 said:
more land would of been found by now... you really dont think its been explored by now?
Click to expand...

Yes I do think it has been explored somewhat, Admiral Byrd stated he saw more land beyond Antarctica, the next thing you know he is talking about the earth being hollow. They had to make him seem like a total nutter to discredit his earlier gaff about their being more land. 60 countries that normally don't get along signed a treaty during the cold war, outlawing the development and occupation of Antarctica. Sort of weird, seeing how there is supposed to be diamonds, oil, coal and tons of other interesting goodies there.
 
WeedFreak78 said:
Why is it so hard to believe a "soft" door can't seal well against space if its engineered correctly? Layered, nonporous modern fabrics of carbon fiber and titanium could withstand the forces and it would only need a semi sturdy frame to house a seal system, which once under pressure won't move . Have you ever worked around pressure/vacuum components? It looks like an exterior cover anyway, probably a uv shield, not a door.

The guy in that video is an idiot. He claims ask the wiring is USB, but everything you can see is clearly screw in mil spec connectors.
Click to expand...
It was an underwater mock up. They have them, they use them all the time. Why it had an earth background I do not know, It was probably photo shopped in, It was done under water for sure. The other shit can be done with zero g planes. If you combine the two WOW I'm in space. Look for space bubbles, you'll see them with the spacewalk videos. I think most of the crap you see is bullshit publicity stunts.
 
Dr.Pecker said:
It was an underwater mock up. They have them, they use them all the time. Why it had an earth background I do not know, It was probably photo shopped in, It was done under water for sure. The other shit can be done with zero g planes. If you combine the two WOW I'm in space. Look for space bubbles, you'll see them with the spacewalk videos. I think most of the crap you see is bullshit publicity stunts.
Click to expand...

Look at the part where they have the cgi earth in it. That part has the flimsy door.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
Newton's law of universal gravitation. Newton's law of universal gravitation states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Same fucking thing whiner.
Click to expand...

This moron copies and pastes all his info from Wikipedia.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
Try this gravity experiment. Find a giant boulder and hold a marble next to it. Does gravity from the larger mass attract the small marble or pebble? Post your results.
Click to expand...
Yes if they were picometres from each other and u had sensitive enough equipment u could measure the attractive force using the following as I mentioned previously image.png
 
Dr.Pecker said:
I don't talk to jew haters.
DK86Vn9.gif
Click to expand...

That's a good little slave.
 
bluntmassa1 said:
Yeah but you posted pictures of water as your no curvature proof so I thought I could get away with it too. Lol
Click to expand...


Right, we agree water does not curve, it always finds it's level. So, looking at a globe, how does that water bend itself 7500 miles high around the globe earth? Fucking impossible when considered with an adult mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top