dozens of good guys with guns fail to stop single bad guy with gun

[testiclees]

Good for you. You must be very busy here!

witless lout STFU

 

[UncleBuck]

So upsetting when someone I hold in no regard has a bad opinion of me....whoa is me...

it's not really an opinion, it is a fact. you are too much of a pussy to back up your own blather.

it is not my opinion when i say that even you know how full of shit you are, it is a fact based on how much of a pussy you are.

 

[Bugeye]

witless lout STFU

You first.

 

[testiclees]

So upsetting when someone I hold in no regard has a bad opinion of me....whoa is me...

when two immediately ID you as a loutish ass....it behooves you to engage critical self reflection

 

[testiclees]

You first.

LOL you're a piece of work/shit

 

[Bugeye]

it's not really an opinion, it is a fact. you are too much of a pussy to back up your own blather.

it is not my opinion when i say that even you know how full of shit you are, it is a fact based on how much of a pussy you are.

says someone of no consequence.

 

[Bugeye]

when two immediately ID you as a loutish ass....it behooves you to engage critical self reflection

Oh, new rules here?

 

[testiclees]

says someone of no consequence.

says someone of no consequence. Idiot

 

[Bugeye]

says someone of no consequence. Idiot

I'm a nobody here, why so bothered?

 

[Olive Drab Green]

NRA probably feels a little silly right now, as do their bootlicking racist followers.

To be fair, that's kind of what an ambush is intended to do: Give you the upper hand through element of surprise and initiation of the engagement, hopefully striking down their numbers and gaining the forward momentum. He actually did it pretty right, for what it's worth. Good application, terrible motive and plans for egress, support, and a few other things. 8/10.

 

[testiclees]

Oh, new rules here?

No JA, good judgement, discerning sensibilities. Get it you're a lout

 

[Bugeye]

No JA, good judgement, discerning sensibilities. Get it you're a lout

Thank you for your opinion. Given the lofty nature of this section of RIU, I will award it due consideration.

 

[Fogdog]

Nothing will bring the number of negligent shootings to zero. Nothing will stop crooks from being crooks. Nothing will stop criminals from using guns in the commission of their crimes. We live in the real world. Some people are going to be murdered, robbed, raped, and assaulted. The best that you as an individual can do is to be cautious and do your best to avoid being preyed upon. Failing that, defend yourself vigorously. The cops are almost never in a position to defend you because they are not there.

Vigorously prosecute those who maliciously injure others, whether with guns, knives, baseball bats, or fists. Prosecute those who burglarize homes and steal guns. Those are crimes that actually deserve incarceration.

You say there is "no reduction in death by firearms". Have you paid even a little attention to actual crime statistics? Your claim is ridiculous.

Now, would you care to answer the questions I posed.

How do you keep crazy people from exercising their civil rights? Are you in favor of secret government databases of citizens used to deny those citizens civil rights?

What common-sense gun control measure being proposed would have prevented any of the recent, well publicized shootings? Should gun control measures actually be effective at preventing violent crime, or are they just a political wedge whose only effect will be to deny citizens their civil rights?

So, I know you are a dumbass and expected nothing less from you than the moronic rambling you just presented.

You do know that other countries similar to ours in terms of economy and culture have a fraction of deaths due to guns compared to the US, don't you? That's all I want. Not zero, just equivalent to other developed nations. If you had read what I wrote rather than reacted to any response regarding guns, you'd see that I didn't even mention mass shootings. Shithead.

If gun owners don't take the lead in reducing firearm related deaths and injuries who will?

Eventually the non-gun owner community will and I can almost guarantee you that it will be a shitty response.

I'm not talking about reducing gang or criminal use of guns, just reducing in-home accidents, unjustified shootings like the Florida popcorn killer and gun theft.

I know it's too much to ask but I'll say it anyway. Why don't gun owners take the issue as their own to solve?

 

[testiclees]

I'm a nobody here

same as everywhere else

 

[Bugeye]

same as everywhere else

You seem hurt that an admitted nobody doesn't care about your opinion. Such a fragile thing you are...

 

[testiclees]

NO, that's your imagination taking a shit.

 

[UncleBuck]

It is the cost of a free society.

australia and new zealand rank higher on the scale of "free" societies, and they have strict gun laws and low rates of firearm related deaths.

can you reconcile that one, cop?

 

[Fogdog]

You really are an angry little dickhead, aren't you?

The popcorn shooter (a retired police captain) was prosecuted.

Do you have any ideas to solve the problems you identify that won't violate the civil rights of hundreds of million Americans? It is the cost of a free society.

If you read what I wrote, you will notice I didn't mention mass shootings either, you ill mannered twat.

I do expect a shitty response from opponents of fundamental civil rights.

Calling you a dumbshit and a shithead is descriptive and not a sign of anger at all.

Hey dumbass, the popcorn shooter is using the stand your ground law as a defense. What difference should it make if he's a retired cop? His case hasn't gone to trial yet. It's my guess he will be acquitted. Because in Florida a person who gets scared can kill people.

Why do you to ask me what to do? I don't feel the need to own a gun. It is a fact that the average gun owner is less safe with that gun than without it. If it were up to me, well, you wouldn't like it.

I'm asking you, ugly gap toothed man who is all hat and no cattle, the dip wad racist rat cop who wants to keep his guns this question: Why doesn't the gun community take ownership for making this country safe from the weapons they love so much? Why do you find it acceptable that accidental deaths due to firearms is many times higher in the US than in Canada?

I don't own a gun, so I'm not the problem. Why don't gun owners accept their role as the people who can bring those death rates down?

Why don't you accept that gun owners are causing the problem and that they own fixing it?

You candida scented queef.

 

[Blunted 4 lyfe]

australia and new zealand rank higher on the scale of "free" societies, and they have strict gun laws and low rates of firearm related deaths.

can you reconcile that one, cop?

Even the owner of FOX (Rupert Murdoch ) who was born in Australia has denounced America's passion for guns and has excoriated our Politicians for not passing gun control laws after the killing of innocent children, surprising isn't it?

 

[Rob Roy]

So, I know you are a dumbass and expected nothing less from you than the moronic rambling you just presented.

You do know that other countries similar to ours in terms of economy and culture have a fraction of deaths due to guns compared to the US, don't you? That's all I want. Not zero, just equivalent to other developed nations. If you had read what I wrote rather than reacted to any response regarding guns, you'd see that I didn't even mention mass shootings. Shithead.

If gun owners don't take the lead in reducing firearm related deaths and injuries who will?

Eventually the non-gun owner community will and I can almost guarantee you that it will be a shitty response.

I'm not talking about reducing gang or criminal use of guns, just reducing in-home accidents, unjustified shootings like the Florida popcorn killer and gun theft.

I know it's too much to ask but I'll say it anyway. Why don't gun owners take the issue as their own to solve?

Will the non gun owners use guns to enforce the choices they place on gun owners?