Why should you take the 2016 Presidential election seriously?

[Unclebaldrick]

 

[MeJuana]

Sorry I thought you were someone else.. retracted my post

 

[schuylaar]

Holding us hostage?

They're all there until death..it's pretty creepy to suggest we vote based upon someone's imminent death.. RBG will be there until she's 100..she's said as much.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Holding us hostage?

They're all there until death..it's pretty creepy to suggest we vote based upon someone's imminent death.. RBG will be there until she's 100..she's said as much.

Sorry, what?

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Holding us hostage?

They're all there until death..it's pretty creepy to suggest we vote based upon someone's imminent death.. RBG will be there until she's 100..she's said as much.

I don't understand your response?

 

[Unclebaldrick]

He's already dead. It wasn't my fault.

 

[bearkat42]

This photo was clearly taken after scalia croacked. Look at how sad the black one looks. Like his puppet master just died.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

 

[UncleBuck]

View attachment 3743134

needs more fruit loops.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Does it make any of you guys mad Clinton and the DNC has put the supreme court at risk?

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Does it make any of you guys mad Clinton and the DNC has put the supreme court at risk?

You are sounding more and more naive.

I like ya dude, but don't be ridiculous.

 

[Padawanbater2]

You are sounding more and more naive.

I like ya dude, but don't be ridiculous.

How is that naive or ridiculous?

Clinton and the DNCs conduct during the primary has changed many voters minds about casting their vote for her and she picked a corporatist democrat as her VP. People like me who initially would have voted for her won't now because of that. No real idea on how many votes that will make, but if she loses the nomination, we lose the supreme court for decades to come

 

[londonfog]

How is that naive or ridiculous?

Clinton and the DNCs conduct during the primary has changed many voters minds about casting their vote for her and she picked a corporatist democrat as her VP. People like me who initially would have voted for her won't now because of that. No real idea on how many votes that will make, but if she loses the nomination, we lose the supreme court for decades to come

I would suggest that you vote for Hillary. Do you really want Donald picking two SCOTUS ? Get over yourself and this unhealthy obsession with Bernie as POTUS. He is with Hillary now... and so should you

 

[Rob Roy]

d. none of the above

 

[desert dude]

Does it make any of you guys mad Clinton and the DNC has put the supreme court at risk?

Nope.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

d. none of the above

posting is easy.

even a caveman can do it...

 

[Padawanbater2]

I would suggest that you vote for Hillary. Do you really want Donald picking two SCOTUS ? Get over yourself and this unhealthy obsession with Bernie as POTUS. He is with Hillary now... and so should you

I don't want any conservatives picking supreme court justices, that's why I'm pretty angry with Clinton and the DNCs conduct during the primary that raised the likelihood of that risk coming to fruition

I didn't do that, and if she loses, it won't be because of people like me who choose not to vote for her. It'll be because real progressives don't support corruption

 

[UncleBuck]

I don't want any conservatives picking supreme court justices, that's why I'm pretty angry with Clinton and the DNCs conduct during the primary that raised the likelihood of that risk coming to fruition

I didn't do that, and if she loses, it won't be because of people like me who choose not to vote for her. It'll be because real progressives don't support corruption

fucking bernie babies.

 

[Rob Roy]

posting is easy.

even a caveman can do it...

View attachment 3743327

 

[Padawanbater2]

fucking bernie babies.

At least we know who the real progressives are