reddan1981
Well-Known Member
(Im not busting your balls here honestly) What method are you using to get 56feet?56 feet for 84 miles
(Im not busting your balls here honestly) What method are you using to get 56feet?56 feet for 84 miles
Pythagorean theorem(Im not busting your balls here honestly) What method are you using to get 56feet?
8" per mile x the distance squared.Pythagorean theorem
"The Earth has a radius of approximately 3965 miles. Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile."
8" per mile = 84 miles x 8" = 672" / 12" = 56'
Where does it say 'x the distance squared'?8" per mile x the distance squared.
You've been provided with evidence which you choose to reject.I would really like to see some evidence that we live on a ball earth please. Otherwise, the flat earth theory wins this debate.
Look at the inches per mileYeah, so where does it say 'x the distance squared'?
Where does it say in PT to square the distance?Look at the inches per mile
1=8
2=32
3=72
4=128
10=800
To anybody. The concept of gravity is easy to grasp on either side of this thread. But it doesn't make sense. You existing, me, and everyone and everything. Should not exist.To you
Not according to the second law of thermodynamics, anyways.To anybody. The concept of gravity is easy to grasp on either side of this thread. But it doesn't make sense. You existing, me, and everyone and everything. Should not exist.
Balls. You deleted part of your post before I could quote it.Not according to the second law of thermodynamics, anyways.
Please provide the post in question.Balls. You deleted part of your post before I could quote it.
For those of you who missed it, reddan was trying to explain how the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be curved.
Go on..
You just deleted it. It was part of the post I quoted.Please provide the post in question.
You are clutching at strings mate, the hypotenuse is the sum of A squared + B squared.You just deleted it. It was part of the post I quoted.
Something about how we're measuring point A to point B, the curved distance, or 'the hypotenuse'.
You probably read it back to yourself realized the flaw in your logic.
the pot being racist to the kettle...I bet most of you dumbasses here haven't even opened up an outer space encyclopedia but yet you wanna make it seem like you know what you're talking about, Rotfl
a squared + b squared = c squared won't work for circumference, and won't allow you to see past a curve.Flipping heck pad....
View attachment 3771972
Nah man ive actually done my fair share of reading not on the internet either, that's why i dont bother arguing about this subject.the pot being racist to the kettle...