Then do you see that math being worked out here? You only use PPFD when you compare equal size areas. I thought that was a given.
CXB3590DB36V4000K 16 COBS @1.4A ON 1.813 PROFILE HEATSINK
25 SQ.FT. CANOPY 94% EFFICIENT DRIVER @13 CENTS PER KWH
Total power watts at the wall: 831.91
Cobs power watts: 782
Total voltage forward: 558
Total lumens: 154163
Total PAR watts assuming 10% loss: 430
Total PPF: 1947.9
PPFD based on canopy area: 838.68
PAR watts per sq.ft.: 17.2
Cob efficiency: 61.03%
Power watts per sq.ft.: 31.28
Voltage forward per cob: 34.89
Lumens per watt: 197.14
Heatsink riser thickness / number of fins / fin's length: 0.3in/6/0.95in
Heatsink area per inch: 100.94 cm^2
Total heat watts: 305
umol/s/W / CRI: 4.53 / 70CRI
Heatsink length passive cooling @120cm^2/heatwatt: 363 inches
Heatsink length active cooling @40cm^2/heatwatt: 121 inches
COB cost dollar per PAR watt: $1.87
Electric cost
@12/12 in 30 days: $39.43
Electric cost @18/6 in 30 days: $58.9
Cost per cob: $50.17
Heatsink cost per inch cut: $0.66
Total cobs cost: $803
Total heatsink passive cooling cost: $240
Total heatsink active cooling cost: $79
I understand where youre coming from but its the whole industry thats wrong about how to properly approach the measurements. Heres a good link on it.
https://www.ledgrowlightsdepot.com/pages/par-ppf-ppfd-and-dli-uncovered
https://growershouse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/blog_digilumeDE_PAR.jpg