Why did CBS edit Bill Clinton's quote when interviewed by Charlie Rose about Hillary's health?

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Original quote:

"Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors, because frequently—well not frequently, rarely—but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated."

What aired on CBS:



Why did CBS edit out the bolded portion of the quote?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Original quote:

"Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors, because frequently—well not frequently, rarely—but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated."

What aired on CBS:



Why did CBS edit out the bolded portion of the quote?
I'm going to guess that no one in the mass media disinformation- err, 'news' business remains untouched by influence.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
still butthurt about bernie?
To be honest, what bothers me even more than Sanders being shafted by the DNC and democratic establishment is people like you, who are rightly on the left side of the spectrum by all accounts, who idly accept it and claim victory from a rigged system

AKA, the regressive left

You're the left's version of the Alt-right and the reason people like me and tty get generalized just the same
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
still butthurt about bernie?
This goes a lot further than the Bern, and the blatant manipulation of the nomination process.

Just six major media outlets control over 90% of all 'news' dissemination in this country, and there are a surprising number of major stockholders who own large blocs of shares in more than one.

This isn't coincidence, it's conspiracy.

I could be happy with a Clinton presidency if it weren't so obviously rigged.

This is something you should be concerned about, even if you do think of yourself as part of the elite, having married into it yourself.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
To be honest, what bothers me even more than Sanders being shafted by the DNC and democratic establishment is people like you, who are rightly on the left side of the spectrum by all accounts, who idly accept it and claim victory from a rigged system

AKA, the regressive left

You're the left's version of the Alt-right
just shut up.

one of the toughest things about progress is preserving it. call me part of the preservationist left if you want.

but your butthurt tantrums about the better candidate winning is just tears.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
just shut up.

one of the toughest things about progress is preserving it. call me part of the preservationist left if you want.

but your butthurt tantrums about the better candidate winning is just tears.
Awww, so you have to go all junkyard dog on him because he poked you where it's tender?

That just tells me he's onto something.

Admit when you're wrong, buckie. It gives you more credibility.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This goes a lot further than the Bern, and the blatant manipulation of the nomination process.

Just six major media outlets control over 90% of all 'news' dissemination in this country, and there are a surprising number of major stockholders who own large blocs of shares in more than one.

This isn't coincidence, it's conspiracy.

I could be happy with a Clinton presidency if it weren't so obviously rigged.

This is something you should be concerned about, even if you do think of yourself as part of the elite, having married into it yourself.
you'll be happier if trump wins and decades of progress are reversed by new-scalia and RBG's ultra right wing usurper?

use your head here. you live in a swing state.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
you'll be happier if trump wins and decades of progress are reversed by new-scalia and RBG's ultra right wing usurper?

use your head here. you live in a swing state.
Indeed I do. I also live in a precinct that voted over 80% in favor of Mr Sanders in the nomination. Don't try to tell me the process wasn't rigged.

I'm no more a fan of the Chump than you are. The only thing worse than seeing him win?

Watching democracy die.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
just shut up.

one of the toughest things about progress is preserving it. call me part of the preservationist left if you want.

but your butthurt tantrums about the better candidate winning is just tears.
That's not the issue, progress would have happened under a Sanders administration just the same

You know what your kind of outlook/attitude towards this issue get's us? More republicans in office, so much for progress.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
just shut up.

one of the toughest things about progress is preserving it. call me part of the preservationist left if you want.

but your butthurt tantrums about the better candidate winning is just tears.
Tell me to go fuck my old/fat/damaged/drunkard/etc. self, but you are wrong to go at Padawanbater in this way. I've been in and out of bed with the Clintons for years, even during the fun times when Bill and Vernon Jordan would tag team Monica, but I'm also aware of the flaws/cracks.
I'm sure Hil will do a fine job, but I always pushed for Bernie. I'd rather see Biden....really wish Neil deGrasse Tyson would run at some point....
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
the process wasn't rigged.
Your credibility is lacking on this point.

Again, I'd happily accept a FAIRLY NOMINATED candidate. That's just not what happened.

The next great question in American politics is whether and when the electorate will realize they've been disenfranchised and what they'll do about it.

My highly educated guess is they won't, and even if they do they won't do anything about it.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Tell me to go fuck my old/fat/damaged/drunkard/etc. self, but you are wrong to go at Padawanbater in this way. I've been in and out of bed with the Clintons for years, even during the fun times when Bill and Vernon Jordan would tag team Monica, but I'm also aware of the flaws/cracks.
I'm sure Hil will do a fine job, but I always pushed for Bernie. I'd rather see Biden....really wish Neil deGrasse Tyson would run at some point....
Oh hell yeah! A physicist for president! He's got my vote!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Tell me to go fuck my old/fat/damaged/drunkard/etc. self, but you are wrong to go at Padawanbater in this way. I've been in and out of bed with the Clintons for years, even during the fun times when Bill and Vernon Jordan would tag team Monica, but I'm also aware of the flaws/cracks.
I'm sure Hil will do a fine job, but I always pushed for Bernie. I'd rather see Biden....really wish Neil deGrasse Tyson would run at some point....
he's basically doing whatever he can to keep clinton from getting elected because he has a retarded conspiracy theory cooked up to justify bernie's 3+ million vote loss.

he's not being a grownup here at all.

the store was out of his favorite soda so he's drinking bleach instead.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Your credibility is lacking on this point.

Again, I'd happily accept a FAIRLY NOMINATED candidate. That's just not what happened.

The next great question in American politics is whether and when the electorate will realize they've been disenfranchised and what they'll do about it.

My highly educated guess is they won't, and even if they do they won't do anything about it.
hillary was fairly nominated.

bernie even won our local caucus here. wouldn't have happened if things were rigged.
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
just shut up.

one of the toughest things about progress is preserving it. call me part of the preservationist left if you want.

but your butthurt tantrums about the better candidate winning is just tears.
Bernie polled much better with Independents, and against Trump for president in overall election compared to Hillary. So if you really believed that, you would have selected Bernie since he had a higher chance of "preserving the progress"
 
Top