eatspam
Well-Known Member
yeh I agree man... the way I look at it, there are two types of movies: entertainment, and art (film, if you will).
My example is always mortal kombat (the first movie): Its a good, highly entertaining movie, but a horrible film. Thats how crank is, a good movie, but a bad film... Thats why I gauged it on the Statham Scale of Crappiness.
Remembering back on Crank, it was actually a really good movie. I think I actually sat down and watched it twice...
wouldn't you say that matrix 1 =film, while matrix 2&3 = movie?
even tho the sequels weren't up to par with the first one, they still beat the shit out of most other sequels that were coming out around it (not including any comic movies, they're formula is to make continual sequels).
in my opinion, the 2nd 2 movies did exactly what the were ment to do,
*be flashy and kick alot of ass without being TOO gory
*sell tickets and DVD's
*pretend to be smart that way people can justify watching a main actor that cant act and a woman who is only hot cause she is bendiy enough to scorpion kick some one in the face while wearing latex beating the shit out of people for 2 and a half hours each movie.