You are overstating your case just like Trump did many times during the debate. Believe me. Replace "this century" with past 16 years and it's the same but doesn't have the same grandiose tone.
How about the past 50 years? It's a better sample size. Genocide over the past 50 years:
- Sep 7th, 1945. Mao's China (1945 - 1976) ...
- Oct 20th, 1975. Pol Pot (Cambodia) (1975- 1979) ...
- Apr 6th, 1994. Rwandan Genocide (1994) ...
- Oct 21st, 2003. Sudan Darfur (2003)
The issue is about bad people doing bad things when given the opportunity. Genocidal acts stem from having a psychopath zealot in charge such as Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, the creep in charge of Daesh. They have more in common with each other than in any religion or ideology.
Who is turning a blind eye toward people suffering? Is the US supposed to rush into war without regard of consequences to address wrongs? Do you have any idea what the consequences might be if we declared all out war and invaded Iraq and Syria? Is that what you are proposing?
All this anti Muslim rhetoric has triggered a flood of hate crimes against Muslims or people who look like them over the past two years. Do you think it's a healthy trend in the US that Muslim people are now targets of hate crimes? Ever since Ted Cruz started beating the anti-Islam drum in early 2015, hate crimes resulting assaults, murders, property damage, attacks on mosques have all risen by about 8 times over previous years.
Which brings me to your statement:
In most of your bombasts posted here, you don't differentiate all of Islam from specific groups in troubled parts of the world that actually do commit atrocities. One could infer that you are on a mission against all Islam. From you statement above, that's not true.
Because words matter -- and innocent people in the US are affected by what people say against Islam -- why not be more specific about your object of anger? The people committing atrocities have more in common with other genocidal zealots than other people of Islam.