researching
Well-Known Member
Do you not have a sense of humor? Why be so literal!?Oh just relax who are you surpreme led god and judge give it a rest chief
Do you not have a sense of humor? Why be so literal!?Oh just relax who are you surpreme led god and judge give it a rest chief
I just take it as I see it maybe you should be more clear roflDo you not have a sense of humor? Why be so literal!?
Thanks for proving my point.I just take it as I see it maybe you should be more clear rofl
I never said she was hot just tall at 5 foot 3.congrats! your wife isnt as hot as sunni tho so pic or quiet yourself im working here
ya I call him the dream crusher .I thought FUD was Dutch? Or at least I know one who is also into mono's, far red, PPFD measuring, aquariums, posting presumptions as facts, posting random links to research papers as "proof" (when nothing of what he claims is actually discussed in it) and thinks he's providing "science" while in reality everyone thinks he's an idiot.
He's a troll in the sense that he keeps posting his bullshit, but he actually has it in his head that he's correct.
I haven't seen him this vindictive, but then I've never seen a forum this poorly moderated. Mods complaining about too much reporting when one user is at the base of all of them seems like an easy fix
Point that your dancing?Thanks for proving my point.
I don't think @Greengenes707 has made many friends around here behind the scenes, and I like that the mods err on the side of free expression. For instance, your posts are often abrasive and confrontational, but I'm still glad you are allowed to contribute without the politeness police banning you.
On a side note: @PhotonFUD is subtle in his trolling. He's very, very good.
In GG's thread he was clearly trolling, but his "400umol" stance seems to be something he really believes. Or that we should measure center PPFD/W for all light sources.
It"s also not about being abrasive or disagreement. I can't believe people in general would report posts when they simply disagree. 40 reports in a short time shows there is an actual problem. When say a dozen people report the posts from one guy and this guy also reports some posts oif this dozen, then it would seem quite clear where the issue originates.
See what I mean? I am envious.Apparently so good that I don't even know that I am doing it.
Merit should be based on the content, not the contributor.
heyheyheyheyhey as much as I enjoy the bullshit that seems to be thrown through this forum and in the specific threads that it comes up in, could we please just for fucking once remember the name of the thread
'why dont we collectively throw down for sphere data?'
Seriously if you want to invade people's threads with you people's ever lasting bullshit - go smoke another cone and fuck riiiiiiiiight off
Pretty please stop shitting throughout yet another thread:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I for one would love to see spherical data for all cobs @ 6", 12", 18" & 24" - although that's probably asking for a lot hahaha
Hell I'd even teach myself & quickly throw together a website to display the data if someone provided accurate standardized data for individual cobs
Why dont you just paint the inside of a basketball white,make a trap door and mount your li cor inside it lmao.see i just saved you 3 to 4 k,thank me laterz
well yeah, i dont build fixtures.. but if i did i sure would spend $500 to fully characterize it in an accredited lab
my gig is rooting out the best chip values and then offering them up... so yeah it fits me.... and most of the DIYers as well.
But you do build and sell almost complete single cob fixtures(minus driver)...........lol
https://cobkits.com/product-category/light-engines/
BTW, if I find out you had anything to do with GG's thread getting harassed&closed, multiple accounts is nothing new to you BobbyG..........well, i'm not going to be happy, we will let RIU be the judge/ jury on that; fucking shameful what happened.........one of the BEST threads on here, invaluable info over the years.
Very similar postings to photonfud, including both recommending a19 led bulbs for grows, nobody does except you and az2000 ( back in the day). You brought up this forum's "clique" mentality when GG cut you off, photonfud said the same shit, forum education levels etc.. GG told you to GTFO of his thread and photoncrud starts his BS, ==== coincidence? maybe
Looking up his etl status on intertek was a smart move,i'll give you that..............all that testing research you've been doing lately, hmmmmmm
Tell me I'm wrong?.........
Uh...You should be complaining to Citizen, Cree and other emitter manufacturers to do it for you
i think the idea is that although lamps are similar in direction, there may be slight differences. im not expecting much relative difference vs the 12" on axis measurements i take, but technically its correct.And on that note i still don't know how a speres data will be important for a directional lamp.
someone like yourself with great skills would be good for that. if you got the space i got the chips. it doesnt need to be a commercial for citi or whatever. id personally like to see good consistent sided by sides of stuff like 80 vs 90 cri etc. most spectrums are similar from mfr to mfr anyway.The most important data we could have at this point is multiple grows under all these dif chips.imo of course lmao