Sent this to the DOJ Yesterday:
I have already Submitted a Lawsuit, but I thought I would also submit the complaint to the DOJ. Please get ahold of me at my phone number at X. The lawsuit can be found at 1:2016cv01117 in the 5th Circuit region.
The Defendants are:
Chuck Rosenberg (DEA Administrator)
Loretta Lynch (US AG)
Stepan Company
Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals
Here is the Class in the Lawsuit:
All United States Persons who practice Hinduism (or similarly barred Religion) or who are or wish to become Sadhus (Hindu Priests), or who have been barred from doing so for fear of the Controlled Substances Act, as well as any Hindu (or similar Religious Practitioner) who has been jailed or imprisoned as a result of this Act. As well as anyone who has lost the life of a family member due to this Act; and
All United States Persons who have been financially affected by the Monopoly enforced and operated by Defendants. As well as anyone who was jailed or imprisoned in the course of the enforcement of this Monopoly, family members of those killed in the process of that enforcement and anyone who has been in fear for their life or safety as a result of the enforcement of the Monopoly and overbroad enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act in general.
The DEA is supporting Monopolies, an example of this is the Monopoly where Stepan Company imports Coca Leaves, extracts the Cocaine, then sells that Cocaine to Mallinckodt, but Stepan keeps the Coca Leaves to create a Coca extract with no Cocaine in it, then sells that Extract Commercially to Coca-Cola. No one else in the country gets to make this extract because the DEA won't let them import Coca Leaves or extract Cocaine.
This has been brought up in a previous case: 375 F.3d 1148 (D.C. Cir. 2004)
But the DEA has failed to correct their mistakes.
They also, during the enforcement of these Monopolies, violate Religions like mine which include Marijuana use. But they allow companies like Mallinckrodt to Manufacture and Distribute Cannabinoids. This is Gerrymandering and Religious Gerrymandering. My brother also died because the current enforcement by the DEA, though it claims to allow for Medical use of Cannabinoids that have been researched, does not allow for easy access to Hospitals. So he is dead.
MM Steel, LP v. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. et al, No. 4:2012cv01227 - Document 504 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
2 Companies conspiring against Competitor(s)
Tunica Web Advertising v. TUNICA CASINO OPERATORS, 496 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2007)
Section 1 of the Sherman Act
Spectators’ Comm. Network, Inc. v. Colonial Country Club, et al., 253 F.3d 215 (5 th Cir. 2001)
- Engaged in Conspiracy;
- That restrained trade;
- In a particular market
NW Wholesale Stationers v. Pac. Stationery 472 U.S. 284 (1985)
“Disadvantage competitors by directly denying… relationships the competitor needs in the competitive struggle”
To purposely allow one company to produce something, whether by the companies own efforts to push others out, or by legislation, is the essence of Monopoly
(via United States v. E. C. Knight Co. 156 U.S. 1 (1895))
“In commenting upon the statute, 21 Jac. I. c. 3, at the commencement of chapter 85 of the third institute, entitled "Against Monopolists, Propounders, and Projectors," Lord Coke, in language often quoted, said:
"It appeareth by the preamble of this act (as a judgment in Parliament) that all grants of monopolies are against the ancient and fundamental laws of this kingdome. And therefore it is necessary to define what a monopoly is."
"A monopoly is an institution, or allowance by the King by his grant, commission, or otherwise to any person or persons, bodies politique, or corporate, of or for the sole buying, selling, making, working, or using of anything, whereby any person or persons, bodies politique, or corporate, are sought to be restrained of any freedome or liberty that they had before or hindred in their lawfull trade."
"For the word 'monopoly,' dicitur [Greek phrase] (i. solo,) [Greek phrase] (i. vendere) quodest cum unus solus aliquod genus mercaturae universum vendit, ut solus vendat, pretium and suum libitum statuens: hereof you may read more at large in that case. Trin. 44 Eliz. Lib. 11, f. 84, 85; le case de monopolies."
Here is a Statement from you guys at the DOJ Anti-Trust Division that supports my case:
https://www.justice.gov/atr/memorandum-antitrust-division-united-states-department-justice-amicus-curiae-support-application
Here is a DEA recent Policy change that supports my case (I have been affected by this for 10+ years, and my brother is dead, so them realizing they were in the wrong 2 months ago is too little too late):
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/rules/2016/fr0812_3.pdf
This shows where the DEA allows Mallinckrodt to Manufacture Cannabinoids (Religions should get similar exemption, or it is Gerrymandering):
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/manufact/app/2001/fr0530.htm
This shows where the DOJ made a statement about Marijuana, allowing for exemption, but forgot to add Religion:
https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/3052013829132756857467.pdf
I have already filed the lawsuit, but would appreciate if you guys would back up the Statements you have made in the past (Judicial Estoppel). Please contact me at the number provided.
Thank you