Hillary can't be trusted

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I just don't understand seeing pro Hillary voters in this thread, , and there posts for anti GMO;s bashing it to all hell as Monsanto the Evil
Yet Hillary is all for it
Dude, she's running against somebody. One or the other will be prez. It's not as if we have a "none of the above" box. The choice is Clinton or Trump. Or a protest vote which means whatever people want but it doesn't do much good.
 

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
I just don't understand seeing pro Hillary voters in this thread, , and there posts for anti GMO;s bashing it to all hell as Monsanto the Evil
Yet Hillary is all for it
yet Repubs are the ones trying to block states from requiring food labeling? you do know hillary is a democrat, right?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
anchor: what is your position on GMO's mr trump?
trump: i almost bought a GMO in the late 60's but decided on a Corvette instead. i could reach their pussies easier in the Vette
So, Trump supports GMOs for the little people. But wouldn't have one himself. Thought so.
 

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
And if Clinton becomes president, you can expect the full Monsanto agenda to be aggressively pushed as national policy:

• A nationwide federal ban on GMO labeling.

• Immediate USDA approval of all experimental GMO crops.

• Extreme, politically motivated attacks against all anti-GMO activists, scientists and journalists.

• Huge increases in taxpayer-funded subsidies for farmers who grow GMO crops.

• Aggressive corporate imperialism push to overturn bans on glyphosate and GMOs by other nations.

• Possibly even attempts by the FDA to outlaw non-GMO Project Verified labels in the same way they attacked hormone-free labels for cow’s milk.

Make no mistake: A vote for Hillary is a vote for Monsanto
I just unignored the trolls so I could see the response your post was replied to with by a troll,sure as shit the Troll responding to your evidence against Hillary redirected into an attack about Trump issues, within 3 minutes of you posting :lol:

Now its not about Hillary being owned by Monsanto,now its defending Trumps language :clap:

If you aren't aware there are at least 2 corporate owned sites that pay $15-$20 an hour for Trolls to suppress all negative Clinton information,Media Matters & Correct the Record admit they are paying over 1 million professional posters to " correct the record " and post " truth " ,I posted wikileaks 18 that takes 4 minutes to watch the video outlining the new evidence & 29 seconds after I hit the post button was hit by a troll redirect,any Clinton info you post will be answered in a way that leads you to talk about Donald trump,as was just done by site troll #2 FogDog.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I just unignored the trolls so I could see the response your post was replied to with by a troll,sure as shit the Troll responding to your evidence against Hillary redirected into an attack about Trump issues, within 3 minutes of you posting :lol:

Now its not about Hillary being owned by Monsanto,now its defending Trumps language :clap:

If you aren't aware there are at least 2 corporate owned sites that pay $15-$20 an hour for Trolls to suppress all negative Clinton information,Media Matters & Correct the Record admit they are paying over 1 million professional posters to " correct the record " and post " truth " ,I posted wikileaks 18 that takes 4 minutes to watch the video outlining the new evidence & 29 seconds after I hit the post button was hit by a troll redirect,any Clinton info you post will be answered in a way that leads you to talk about Donald trump,as was just done by site troll #2 FogDog.
are you too broke to put up for the $5,000 bet, or too much of a pussy?
 

Dankistino

Well-Known Member
I just unignored the trolls so I could see the response your post was replied to with by a troll,sure as shit the Troll responding to your evidence against Hillary redirected into an attack about Trump issues, within 3 minutes of you posting :lol:

Now its not about Hillary being owned by Monsanto,now its defending Trumps language :clap:

If you aren't aware there are at least 2 corporate owned sites that pay $15-$20 an hour for Trolls to suppress all negative Clinton information,Media Matters & Correct the Record admit they are paying over 1 million professional posters to " correct the record " and post " truth " ,I posted wikileaks 18 that takes 4 minutes to watch the video outlining the new evidence & 29 seconds after I hit the post button was hit by a troll redirect,any Clinton info you post will be answered in a way that leads you to talk about Donald trump,as was just done by site troll #2 FogDog.
CNN’s Stelter: Trump Replacing Birther Conspiracy Theory With “Ludicrous" Claim That Media Is Rigging The Election
 

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
I just don't understand seeing pro Hillary voters in this thread, , and there posts for anti GMO;s bashing it to all hell as Monsanto the Evil
Yet Hillary is all for it
I'm with you there,Monsanto can get directly fucked,they can take their GMO's & stuff em up their ass,its like watching a train wreck people know will happen in advance ,instead of stopping it they try to convince others it didn't happen .

Monsanto has proven human life isn't a priority yet Hillary takes millions from them & these idiots chose to close their eyes about it all.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You're gay. All day long you post about man ass. 24/7/365 you stare at man ass. You love it. Can't get enough of it.
what's wrong with being gay ?
I'm not. Very happily married for 20 plus years, but whats wrong with being gay ?
Do you always associate a man wiping his ass ( or not ) as gay ?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You're still on the down low? Wifey never has to know?
It doesn't take a phycologist to know men obsessed with other men's asses is probably gay.
Nah if I was gay I would go full throttle. No shame in my game. How about you ? Would you go full throttle or be in the closet ?
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
So, explain to me what Trump means about building infrastructure in the inner cities? I can't find anything substantive on the subject. Does he mean road, bridges, or does he mean secure water supply and sewage? I also don't understand how this addresses many of the problems present in the inner city. Or is it just another GOP big money give-away to his butt buddies in the 1%.

You speak as if you know something. Show us what you know. Not surmise with truthy wannabe facts but really verifiable facts about his plan.
Really? Have you not heard of the pipes in flint? He visited flint.

We have cities around the nation that have pipes that will fail soon, bridges and roads that need repair, and so on.

Updating everything will save lives, improve safety, and create jobs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top