Is a Soft Coup happening in the United States as we speak?

squarepush3r

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
That's working hard to remain uninformed.

How many hours a day is Faux Spews on in your house?
Click to expand...
I know how modern "hacking" works. Part of hacking is being anonymous, meaning you are routing your internet connection through 20 different proxies around the world so it can't be traced to you.

Do you think Putin just goes on his computer, hacks DNC/Podesta, then leaves behind some borscht and vodka and says thank you? The "evidence" the CIA/FBI has is all motivational evidence, such as "Russia would have a motivation to do the hacking since they could benefit from it, therefore they did it." Also, the leaks are from as far back as January 2015, Trump didn't even announce candidacy until 6 months later, and he was up against 14 other Republicans, so at most if Russia did the hack, it wasn't in coordination with Trump, it was just an attack on the DNC. So linking Trump to Putin is a very false conclusion to make from this as there could of been 14 candidates who won the Republican nomination, unless you think Russia was behind getting Trump the Republican nomination also and they hacked Republicans?

Also, "hacking" a DNC server, and sending a password phishing email from a fake google acct which Podesta clicked at 2 very separate things. I do not see why they are being linked as by being from the same entity.
 
squarepush3r

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i can't wait until the CIA starts releasing fake wikileaks to dupe you idiots all over again.
Click to expand...
Remember when Democrats were antiwar and actually supported whistleblowers and Wikileaks when they benefited from it?



Its sad that after 8 years of Obama so much of the Democrats have sold out and lost legitimacy, now just clinging to power by any means possible, I guess that's what power does.

Also, by the Democrats claiming Russia hacked the emails, they are admitting the information is true. Which still makes Wikileaks trustworthy.
 
Uberknot

Uberknot

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
That's working hard to remain uninformed.

How many hours a day is Faux Spews on in your house?
Click to expand...

LOL what a moron anyone listens to FOX news.

Wiki Leaks has been shown to fabricate lies and post them.

The FBI and the CIA??? that's all they are about is lies.

I can't beleive people actually buy into the shit really I can't
 
F

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
shorelineOG said:
What were the charges and how did they get you?
Click to expand...
Conspiracy to distrubute. I was set up by the buyer after he got caught. I was being watched for almost a year. My phone calls and texts were being monitored, as well as my internet postings. They were rather impressed with my youtube videos and showed a huge interest in the riu picincs.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
squarepush3r said:
Remember when Democrats were antiwar and actually supported whistleblowers and Wikileaks when they benefited from it?



Its sad that after 8 years of Obama so much of the Democrats have sold out and lost legitimacy, now just clinging to power by any means possible, I guess that's what power does.

Also, by the Democrats claiming Russia hacked the emails, they are admitting the information is true. Which still makes Wikileaks trustworthy.
Click to expand...
yeah, the CIA and FBI made it all up. just like they made up global warming.

precedent elect trump said so.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
squarepush3r said:
I know how modern "hacking" works. Part of hacking is being anonymous, meaning you are routing your internet connection through 20 different proxies around the world so it can't be traced to you.

Do you think Putin just goes on his computer, hacks DNC/Podesta, then leaves behind some borscht and vodka and says thank you? The "evidence" the CIA/FBI has is all motivational evidence, such as "Russia would have a motivation to do the hacking since they could benefit from it, therefore they did it." Also, the leaks are from as far back as January 2015, Trump didn't even announce candidacy until 6 months later, and he was up against 14 other Republicans, so at most if Russia did the hack, it wasn't in coordination with Trump, it was just an attack on the DNC. So linking Trump to Putin is a very false conclusion to make from this as there could of been 14 candidates who won the Republican nomination, unless you think Russia was behind getting Trump the Republican nomination also and they hacked Republicans?

Also, "hacking" a DNC server, and sending a password phishing email from a fake google acct which Podesta clicked at 2 very separate things. I do not see why they are being linked as by being from the same entity.
Click to expand...
Not only do you not know Jack shit about computers and the internet, you know even less about how our intelligence services work or how that information is is used.

But @UncleBuck has you pegged already, as someone with the syndrome. What was the two word name for it, again?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
squarepush3r said:
Remember when Democrats were antiwar and actually supported whistleblowers and Wikileaks when they benefited from it?



Its sad that after 8 years of Obama so much of the Democrats have sold out and lost legitimacy, now just clinging to power by any means possible, I guess that's what power does.

Also, by the Democrats claiming Russia hacked the emails, they are admitting the information is true. Which still makes Wikileaks trustworthy.
Click to expand...
Derp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top