you are in a deluded thought bubble because you separate yourself from differing opinions in reality so you are the minority
we've actually been reducing our arsenal.My point is that we are in an arms race
frozen dinner, alone, in the house his now deceased parents left to him.You are sadly mistaken. As long as my family is good, I'm good. My family is doing great.. What you doing for the holidays ?
Can't we start a petition to stop the inauguration?
Obama needs to do something..He can't go and leave us this way..this is all wrong.
Wait, one time I asked you if there was no government, how would we have a space program (and all the benefits that come with it) and you told me it would be privatisedif government didn't seize money from people, about how many nuclear weapons do you think would exist?
Obama has already "done something"Can't we start a petition to stop the inauguration?
Obama needs to do something..He can't go and leave us this way..this is all wrong.
Modernization is different from expansion.Obama has already "done something"
"The Obama administration has requested large increases for nuclear weapons programs at the Defense and Energy Departments to sustain and modernize the arsenal. Indeed, current and proposed spending levels for many key efforts currently exceed what the administration originally advertised early in its first term."
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization
Wait, one time I asked you if there was no government, how would we have a space program (and all the benefits that come with it) and you told me it would be privatised
Now you're using the argument that if the government didn't seize money from people, nuclear weapons probably wouldn't exist because they couldn't pay for them. But what's stopping a private company from stepping up to do just that? Isn't that how those problems get solved in a libertarian world?
Nope, for one thing they're gonna make a gps guided bomb with adjustable yield, which will make it more likely to be used.and the quote shows obama is increasing money for nukes above what he originally proposed.Modernization is different from expansion.
Gee, that's quite a "source". Do you get your news from there?Nope, for one thing they're gonna make a gps guided bomb with adjustable yield, which will make it more likely to be used.and the quote shows obama is increasing money for nukes above what he originally proposed.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/01/18/modernizing-the-opportunities-for-nuclear-war/
The one thing that stops your utopian world are humans. If you get rid of humans then your world just might work. but then no people, so never mind.I don't know how many nuclear weapons would exist in the absence of government forcing people to pay for them, that's why I asked what someone else thought.
I didn't say nuclear weapons would or wouldn't exist, you remanufactured my question into a statement.
I do believe that government has been the only one's to use nuclear weapons though...which is not surprising given it's nature.
Problems in a libertarian world get solved by first determining the nature of the harm and then finding ways to make the victim whole again.
Also, I'm not really a political Libertarian, I'm more of a philosophical "libertarian" (small ell) .
wow. He didn't even tweet about it.Obama has already "done something"
"The Obama administration has requested large increases for nuclear weapons programs at the Defense and Energy Departments to sustain and modernize the arsenal. Indeed, current and proposed spending levels for many key efforts currently exceed what the administration originally advertised early in its first term."
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization
nope, but there are many sources for the same material. Counterpunch's authors are usually pretty far left. The author of the article is Lawrence S. Wittner is Professor of History emeritus at SUNY/Albany.Gee, that's quite a "source". Do you get your news from there?
So you don't see a difference between Obama quietly modernizing (gps guided bombs are not new, cruise missiles have been around for decades) and TRUMP! Sending out provocative tweets?nope, but there are many sources for the same material. Counterpunch's authors are usually pretty far left. The author of the article is Lawrence S. Wittner is Professor of History emeritus at SUNY/Albany.
http://www.lawrenceswittner.com/
Lol.So you don't see a difference between Obama quietly modernizing (gps guided bombs are not new, cruise missiles have been around for decades) and TRUMP! Sending out provocative tweets?