NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
You just admitted that you said Trump would never win and that 'you were wrong'...
And in the same post you proclaim that 'Hillary is not going to be locked up and Trump lied'.
Can you spot the logical fallacy?
Trump Won't Preside. The Left is Right.
- Thread starter ArcticGranite
- Start date
And in the same post you proclaim that 'Hillary is not going to be locked up and Trump lied'.
Can you spot the logical fallacy?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
lol
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Are you saying that you think border security will be worse?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
HAF2
Well-Known Member
So you think if you are wrong about one thing you then must be wrong about everything?
I was wrong in thinking America would never vote him in. I admit that. And if I am wrong about other things in the future I will admit them too.
I don't mind being wrong about things, no one is right all the time.
When (or if) Hilary is not impeached will you admit you were wrong?
Maybe we should table this discussion of possibilities for a month? On February 2nd, 2017 if Hilary is not being charged for her "crimes" will you say you were wrong?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Sorry, you have been widely discredited. Don't take it personally, it is just the way the new 'logic' works.
HAF2
Well-Known Member
Damn, I'm shit. Better stop posting now.
chemphlegm
Well-Known Member
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/aug/15/donald-trump/donald-trump-right-hillary-clinton-once-wanted-wal/
Television news anchor Jorge Ramos asked Clinton this question Jan. 11, 2016 at the Iowa Black and Brown Forum, broadcast on the Fusion network, a Hispanic news channel.
"What the difference between your idea and Donald Trump’s idea on building a wall with Mexico?," Ramos asked.
"So we do need to have secure borders and what that will take is a combination of technology and physical barrier," Clinton said.
"You want a wall then," Ramos interjected.
"No, we’ve --" she said.
"You said that."
"Well, I voted for border security and some of it was a fence," Clinton said. "I don’t think we ever called it a wall. Maybe in some places it was a wall."
Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration policy analyst for the libertarian Cato Institute said the semantic differences are irrelevant.
"Whether it’s a wall or a fence, it blocks people," Nowrasteh said. "Quibbling between a wall and fence -- it’s just a word game at that point."
He noted a 700-mile barrier is substantial. Indeed, it represents about one-third of the length of the border.
"Maybe it’s fair to say she doesn’t support a wall along the entirety but she certainly supported a barrier along a large portion of it," Nowrasteh said."
more> http://bfy.tw/9EhF
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
So by your own links, this is a half-truth. All you really did was prove that Trump's claim that Hillary wanted open borders was a lie. Thank you. You are Not good at stuff.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
imbeciles. Imbeciles everywhere.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
You are going to call this a weasle but quote me where I said she should be charged for her crimes.
I am saying that you were wrong about Hillary Clinton being president so maybe you should consider not making statements of fact before waiting to see the results.
You seem very sure of yourself so it will be all that sweeter if you are right when it actually happens. Right now you are proclaiming the future as fact in the same post where you admit you had your facts wrong about the future.
Regarding Hillary Clinton, I want the FBI to do an impartial and thorough investigation of Hillary Clinton and to deliver their findings to the AG for determination whether charges should be filed as is required by federal law.
I believe her criminal activity relates to the Clinton Foundation and the donations accepted during her term in office and I would like that investigated as well.
Once that is done, we will see if anything happens to her. My guess is no. She is done politically and the politicians protect their own, that is both sides of the aisle.
My guess is that Trump is laying low right now to prevent Obama from pardoning Clinton from what Clinton is saying she didnt do.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
I don't believe that thinking is your game. Have you tried snaking drains or mucking out cesspools?
chemphlegm
Well-Known Member
I wasnt proving anything, only providing links for you to read. quality links, incidentally proving Hillary wanted physical barriers just like trump says he wants. follow the links in their entirety for best results
HAF2
Well-Known Member
This is confusing. So yes or no, do you think she should be charged for her crimes? And yes or no do you think trump is going to charge her?
What I gleaned from your statements is yes, you beleive she should be charged and that trump is going to charge her. Am I correct in my assumptions?
I also haven't been staying anything as fact. These are my Opinons on things. Yours are different. And I never once called you a Weasle. Why you trying to fight we are just having a discussion.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Please reconcile this with Trump's oft-repeated charge that she wanted open borders.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick has a really really bad attention desire issue... You can see by the amount of troll posts.
We were having a good discussion between us, I was respecting you and you were respecting me and it was going well. Doesnt work well for UB's agenda so he jumped in to make it all ugly...
We can continue where we left off before someone shit on the floor.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Sorry bud, your longtime adherence to flat-earth logic has made you laughable in my eyes. It is more fun to just troll you. You are well below my minimum intelligence to take seriously.
Also, I am not really sure Haf thinks this is a good discussion between the two of you. He seems perplexed and confused by your lack of workable logic and just hasn't written you off as a total dumbass yet. I give it another couple of hours.
I gave you a "pity like" because you tend to prove my thoughts on the dimwittedness of the typical Trumpee.
HAF2
Well-Known Member
Oh you quoted me so I thought you were trying to say I was trolling you. My mistake.
I'll admit I have a hard time understanding how anyone can believe Trump is going to be good for America. I guess it's just a wait-and-see scenerio.
I think I also misread when you said I called you a Weasle and you meant something else. It's hard to type sometimes through all the tears.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I am not sure what her crimes are yet. It is clear that she broke the law as Trey Gowdie got Comey to admit that she did so multiple times under oath. We know for a fact that those laws were broken.
But I dont know the facts and I wont ever know the facts but the best chance to get some of the truth is to finish the investigations and let it go from there.
Trump cannot charge her. That is not how the system works. The FBI sends it's recommendations to the AG and it is the AG's responsibility to decide whether to press charges. I dont think Trump is going to get in the way of that.
I think that Trump is not talking about it right now so Obama does not have a reason to pardon her.
HAF2
Well-Known Member
So if she is not formally charged in 2017 you shall admit you were incorrect in your assumptions about this?
I beleive that she is not guilty and will not be charged. And that trump used the country's need to hate something in his campaign and made people hate Hilary more.
All just our own opinions on the matter.