"It has been hypothesized"? What does that even mean? Link to this hypothesis and its formulators?
*Sonoluminescence requires very high energy densities. So for someone to suggest that stars are visual phenomena in a body of water, would such energy densities not first need to be proven to exist and be present? Would it not be a really good idea to first establish where this water is? The
Voyager photos are not helping me here.
View attachment 3867167
No more "flat earth" malarkey!
Cannabineer I am not still here to win any argument. I am trying to get you lot to research this yourself. If you understand space, why would you even ask me to link? The idea of spacetime being a fluid, known as ‘superfluid vacuum theory’ (SVT), isn’t entirely new – it was suggested as long as half a century ago.
Researchers Stefano Liberati, a professor at the International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and Luca Maccione, a research scientist at the Ludwig-Maximilian University in Munich, are the first to tackle the question of the viscosity of such a liquid. In their paper Astrophysical Constraints on Planck Scale Dissipative Phenomena, they tackle the question of spacetime being a fluid.
They did this by creating models attempting to fuse gravity and quantum mechanics into ‘quantum gravity'.
Consider how waves move through water, for example – the wave propagates through the water, using it as a ‘medium’ through which to move.
As far as we know, a transfer of energy of this sort requires a medium, like how sound passes through air or heat through metal.
How, then do electromagnetic waves, photons and so on move through space, where there is believed to be nothing?
The supposed existence of a medium in space is more commonly known as an ether, but proving or disproving its existence has been, until thus far unsuccessful.
A key point of evidence for their theory revolves around the four fundamental forces of the universe – electromagnetism, weak interaction, strong interaction and gravity.
Quantum mechanics is able to explain all of these except for gravity.
I will use gravity, to explain my answer to your second query.
You said, 'would such energy densities not first need to be proven to exist and be present? I don't think you thought about that question before you asked it. If anything you probably held back from a veiled insult, this is why I respect you, because you are a gentlemen.
Have you any
proof that gravity exists?
Can you prove we have an iron core?