No they didn't, I read the report. It's based on a "confidence index", no methods were detailed for data collection, and they admittedly based the findings on assumptions gathered from "a number of pro-Kremlin tweets". If there were anything damning, it would be news. Word of mouth is not evidence, or an argument for that matter. It's a dead end, work on yourselves, or you'll lose again. Fair warning.
Sad!
it was news.
You don't have to talk in 140 character or less. That's Twitter.
It was news that they said Russia "interfered". No one, as I recall, ever said what that "interference" was exactly. Nor did they provide data to substantiate the claim. You really love them headlines, Buck. Feel free to elaborate if you know something that I don't though, I've just never seen one shred of evidence and a whole lot of histrionics and conjecture.
Actually the Russians arrested a number of hackers the other day and charged them with hacking American institutions. Not sure why they did it, and they did it in the open, which was a clear choice as there is no rule of law in Russia. Maybe it was a signal to our President not to get out of line or the whole thing will turn into a show and tell trial. You should read better sources, infant.
the denial of current news fits well with your denial of the holocaust.
He is alt-smart.
The odds are better that they swept up some of our hum-int sources or are distancing themselves from the effort due to us having the evidence that they did it anyway.
Dude, the election is over, remember? You've made clear that you still remember Trump running and maybe you even remember that he won, which an indication that your memory isn't a total loss, so good for you. Now that the election is over, and your guy won, can't you just relax a bit and look at the ramifications of the US government looking the other way when a foreign power, one that is hostile to US interests, interferes with our election? Russia's actions to hack and perform disinformation campaigns in the US is a national issue, not a partisan one.
Can someone tell me where that has even been demonstrated?
your history denial knows no bounds.
LOLOLOLOL !!
Again, not an argument. They kill a lot of terrorists?
