"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"

esh dov ets

esh dov ets

Well-Known Member
666888 said:
Reported


What is so hard to understand

Suckers
Click to expand...
so we shouldn't study earth or climate science anymore since all the science and scientists are wrong. lets focus on nuclear energy instead. don't read or listen to words of caution . the world is over populated so some have to suffer. Let's watch esoteric you tube videos for news and then go trolling the Internet saying everyone else's news is fake.
people--lolpics-lol-picture.jpg
 
esh dov ets

esh dov ets

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Corporations have used the power of the pocketbook to take control of our political system and thus the government, so the government is now a tool used by corporations to screw the average citizen.
Click to expand...
there are also alot of believers so devout that their propaganda seems genuine enough. the god level puppeteers don't believe half the shit they hope you do. and 666 and arctic and some of the ones that don't debate cause they'll loose eat it up.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
666888 said:
Reported


Where is the runaway warming? looks like it will go a bit hotter before it turns, and that would be normal, looking at that long term chart
Nothing to see here, that's not regular behaviour
Looks like the ice age will be right on time, like every other time
There is 4 spikes of temperature a lot higher then we have NOW,
What is so hard to understand

Suckers
Click to expand...
Can't read your own graph? Look more closely. The far right shows a spike in CO2 at the same time we observe a spike in temperature. If the earth were in a normal pattern, we should be in a cooling cycle but that's not what's happening:

Expanding the scale at the far right and using a 3d plot so that the lines don't overlay each other shows how well the recent carbon dioxide emissions coincide with temperature rise and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration.



We are experiencing rapid rise in temperature. The rate of temperature rise is unprecedented and has never occurred -- at least not within the past 450000 or so years.

You have completely accepted the fossil fuel lobby's nonsense that they distribute for the sake of their own profits. You've been mightily shagged.
 
666888

666888

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Can't read your own graph? Look more closely. The far right shows a spike in CO2 at the same time we observe a spike in temperature. If the earth were in a normal pattern, we should be in a cooling cycle but that's not what's happening:

Expanding the scale at the far right and using a 3d plot so that the lines don't overlay each other shows how well the recent carbon dioxide emissions coincide with temperature rise and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration.



We are experiencing rapid rise in temperature. The rate of temperature rise is unprecedented and has never occurred -- at least not within the past 450000 or so years.

You have completely accepted the fossil fuel lobby's nonsense that they distribute for the sake of their own profits. You've been mightily shagged.
Click to expand...
Yeah there is a spike in co2, but the warming hasn't followed it, the temperature hasn't yet exceeded any of the last interglacial periods
It will probably get a bit warmer before it turns and inevitable next ice age starts
Maybe if we pump a shit load of co2 into the atmosphere, we might get a few decades/century's more
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
666888 said:
Yeah there is a spike in co2, but the warming hasn't followed it, the temperature hasn't yet exceeded any of the last interglacial periods
It will probably get a bit warmer before it turns and inevitable next ice age starts
Maybe if we pump a shit load of co2 into the atmosphere, we might get a few decades/century's more
Click to expand...
are making these shitty posts your only source of income?

or do you also get paid to fuck dogs?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
666888 said:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22040-tree-rings-suggest-roman-world-was-warmer-than-thought/
Click to expand...
One person looked at a some tree ring data and claims everything else is wrong. What you posted is a good example of cherry picking data to falsely prove a point. If you think that one article proves anything, you are more of sucker that anybody thought.

Cherry picking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias.[1][2] Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate.[3]

There are hundreds of consistent and clear examples showing the earth is warming at rates not seen in hundreds of thousands of years and you pick on tiny bit of data that supposedly proves all else is wrong. That's also called pseudo science. Where the liar sets out looking for data to prove their fact and ignores anything that conflicts with their desired outcome.

It's a fraud and phoney. You are a sucker.
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
666888 said:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22040-tree-rings-suggest-roman-world-was-warmer-than-thought/
Click to expand...
Discredited, fool.
http://www.livescience.com/21624-tree-rings-global-warming.html

Before making an ass of yourself again, please consult this list of phony and discredited climate change denier talking points. All the greatest hits are there. Science is your friend, dumdum.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

You probably believe the WWE is real and Rush Limbaugh is straight too, don't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top