Someone like Hillary Clinton who accepts bribes because you have to accept bribes to beat Republicans even though she just accepted bribes and lost to the worst Republican presidential candidate in history. But bribes, though, we can't handicap ourselves, now! That would just be foolish... right? I mean, we might lose...
what a dumb fucking way to view the world. you are dumb. so fucking dumb.
She won the popular vote by over 4%...you keep forgetting that.
So what do you consider a bribe then? Does somebody in a trench coat wearing a black bandanna across his eyes have to give a politician a bag of money with a '$' sign on it and explicitly say "So I'm giving you this big bag of money and in return, you're going to do X, Y, and Z for me, right?" "Absolutely, you will get X, Y, and Z!" "OK, great!" and it all has to be recorded by the FBI, CIA, NSA and Homeland Security?
I'll tell you what Clinton supporters told Sanders supporters when they were criticizing how the DNC was handling the primary; Hey, you knew the rules ahead of time, if you didn't think your candidate could win with the existing rules in place, you should have worked to change them before the actual election took place.
If by rules you mean the primary rule that says "should've got more votes" ?I'll tell you what Clinton supporters told Sanders supporters when they were criticizing how the DNC was handling the primary; Hey, you knew the rules ahead of time, if you didn't think your candidate could win with the existing rules in place, you should have worked to change them before the actual election took place.
Changing the vote schedule to ensure more moderate states that would vote for Clinton would be first justifying the media narrative (that we know the Clinton campaign was in collusion with from the DNC leaks) that Clinton was the frontrunner. Changing actual voting schedules in states and counties that were likely to go to Sanders. Abandoning the 'get out the vote' campaign that traditionally targeted the youth vote because the youth vote overwhelmingly went to Bernie Sanders. Pushing narratives that Sanders was an atheist right before primaries in states with traditionally religious voters. Giving the Clinton campaign forward access to debate questions.
nope. i'm gonna bribe my politicians by making a donation to them. i bet 92-95% of congresspeople keep their seats in 2018.
literally none of these things have any basis in fact whatsoever. not one bit.
I agree. I think if we go with Hillary again, we very well might see history repeat itself. I would take either Warren or Sanders on top of the ticket. Warren is a little younger and might be able to shoulder the burden physically, of the presidency a little easier than Sanders, but he would certainly make a great president.
warren will be 70 by 2020.
Who of that age group looks promising? Every time someone shows promise they end up in some kind of ridiculous sex scandal. I could forgive a small sex scandal if someone could show some leadership, and a desire to move forward.
I don't get it either.
me: [donates $250 to local congressperson, asking them to stand up for immigrant rights]
Lame bro!
LOL!
