Berkeley's Liberal Intolerance is about to bite them in the ass.

racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
cool2burn said:
Actually I agree with you I'm not a fan of hers however, what Berkley is doing is just wrong and Kinda violates the First Amendment.
Click to expand...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

i fail to see anything in there about berkely changing a speaking engagement for a right wing wack job to a time that is during finals.. maybe i need to read the fine print, or in between the lines? i'm open to suggestions as to exactly where the first amendment has anything to do with this..
 
Heil Tweetler

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
Actually I agree with you I'm not a fan of hers however, what Berkley is doing is just wrong and Kinda violates the First Amendment.
Click to expand...
cool2burn said:
What it really comes down to is that they can't handle the intolerance of the left being exposed so they're trying to attack me on a personal level. It's not surprising it's right out of the DNC playbook.
Click to expand...
cool2burn said:
No I just believe giving out personal information to strangers is stupid.
Click to expand...
cool2burn said:
Thanks just like I said above in your quote I'm gonna go with 38 today because I have never given you all my real age
Click to expand...
Youre a fucking moron dude.
 
cool2burn

cool2burn

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

i fail to see anything in there about berkely changing a speaking engagement for a right wing wack job to a time that is during finals.. maybe i need to read the fine print, or in between the lines? i'm open to suggestions as to exactly where the first amendment has anything to do with this..
Click to expand...
your info is a bit wrong they tried to change it to the week before finals with everyone I'll be studying. But if you don't get it then I'm not gonna try and explain it to you. Period
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
cool2burn said:
your info is a bit wrong they tried to change it to the week before finals with everyone I'll be studying. But if you don't get it then I'm not gonna try and explain it to you. Period
Click to expand...
the first amendment has to do with the government limiting free speech.. like they can't pass a law saying that they will arrest anyone who calls 45 an ass hat and a racist pig pos, it has absolutely nada to do with a college and who they hire or don't hire for speaking engagements at said university .
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
your info is a bit wrong they tried to change it to the week before finals with everyone I'll be studying. But if you don't get it then I'm not gonna try and explain it to you. Period
Click to expand...
Thanks for not trying to explain it. It can be funny when somebody tries to 'splain something when they don't understand it. As we see endlessly on the grow boards, it can be tiresome and irritating sometimes too. It's always a waste of time.
 
cool2burn

cool2burn

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
the first amendment has to do with the government limiting free speech.. like they can't pass a law saying that they will arrest anyone who calls 45 an ass hat and a racist pig pos, it has absolutely nada to do with a college and who they hire or don't hire for speaking engagements at said university .
Click to expand...
In Berkeley uses US tax dollars
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
LOL way to show tolerance! im going to attack people who do not agree with me...........Liberals......
Click to expand...
gee, you make trump's doctrine of "non-white people have no right to exist" sound like a simple disagreement of opinion. like preferring avocado instead of salsa.

let's rephrase your sentence so that it more accurately reflects your position without euphemism and minimization:

"LOL way to show tolerance! im going to attack people who think that non-white people do not deserve to exist...........Liberals......"

there we go. much better.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Aeroknow said:
So, in your world, everyone who isn't a dumb ass conservative like yourself is some bleeding heart liberal wimp? Times are fucking changing. Get used to it
Click to expand...
I sincerely hope they change fast enough to avoid another Great Crash and resultant Depression.

I mean, exactly who do all those closet authoritarians think 'their' government is going to crack down ON, anyway?!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top