LOL
because the alt-left and the alt-right want the same basic thing: the exaltation of white males above all others.
I'm laughing at Buck for being a complete retard for criticizing someone who supports NAFTA when he also supports NAFTA and both Clintons responsible for passing it. Interestingly enough, Sanders progressives are the only ones who unabashedly oppose NAFTA and the TPP.
So, breaking a trade agreement with your neighbor countries after 20 years is something that should be done without thought?
No, but altering a trade agreement to actually benefit working class people of all nations involved (as the agreement was predicated upon its passage) as opposed to corporations and elites should be done given the years of data collection that proves the latter.
Of course I could, but we'd like to hear your explanation first
Altering the trade agreement in what way? As you point out the problem with NAFTA is that it's enforced mostly in the breach. We have a thriving trade with Mexico that would be improved by staying in and sticking to the kind of agreements you refer to. The problem with NAFTA is the behavior of the players, not the agreement.
In a way that allows prosperity to be felt among everyone involved, not just the top tier
Then that's what needs to be changed. There should be no Democrats OK with this redistribution of prosperity
Sanders support free trade agreements that actually benefit working people. Shocking! I know.. NAFTA and the TPP do not benefit working people. How much did your average American make pre-NAFTA? How much does he make now? How much did America import/export pre-NAFTA, how much do we import/export now? Go down the list. The things NAFTA was supposed to improve have dramatically diminished in value specifically because of unregulated trade focused on benefitting the wealthy at the expense of the poor and working class.
So are Bill and Hillary Clinton wrong for enacting it and supporting it?
no, we need to be flexible about that. we cannot budge on reproductive rights though.
another false bifurcation from mr. everything-has-to-be-black-and-white-except-my-text
what is it with you and the false bifurcations, curtis?
Not sure why it's such a hard question to answer.. You say pretty clearly here you don't support NAFTA, and your previous posts from 2010 very clearly show you don't.. But for whatever strange reason, you can't admit it here, now.
i'm either with you or i'm with the terrorists. there can be no middle ground in between.
Do you realize you can disagree on the issues with a politician you support and still support them? For example, I disagree with Sanders on energy, yet I still support him on his economic policy
nope. if you support a politician you support every last thing they have ever done in perpetuity and throughout the universe.