DNC Email Leak

[Big_Lou]

It seems, from an outside perspective, the right band together and rally behind their representative. Blindly and stupidly

They suuurrreeee do.....

 

[tangerinegreen555]

The modicum of respect I hold for you always goes out the window with personal attacks on our regulars, Buck.

You can reason with people who are reasonable.

It's bad enough the 2 major parties are polarized to the point of virtual gridlock.

When polarization happens within a party, it becomes embarrassing.

What about the environment, just to name one (rather fucking important) thing?

You never heard the expression, 'all's fair in love, war and politics'?

There's a whole half a country's worth of voters to fight with. Pick your battles and don't expect perfection.

We've gone so far to the right in the last 35 years, but we're going to argue over DNC rules. Seems somewhat misguided.

 

[HAF2]

The New York Times came out with a pretty good guess list of potentials.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/30/us/politics/democrats-2020.amp.html

 

[schuylaar]

You figure you're going to change it?

Best of luck!

Not being rude..Tangie, but if not us, then who?

Change will have to come from below, up..it will never come from the top, down.

 

[schuylaar]

I think he already has some sort of brain tumor.

No normal person lives by lies. No normal politician has so many low information followers. Racism is alive and well in that crowd.

But the problem is with the Democrats according to our brilliant in house analysts. Give me a fucking break already.

It's the new lie that he will turn into truth by perpetuating the lie.

 

[schuylaar]

It seems, from an outside perspective, the right band together and rally behind their representative. Blindly and stupidly (I might add), but together nonetheless.

The left don't as much. Some are democrats, some independents, green, some think so and so isn't liberal enough, or too liberal, or "socialist".

Hopefully the left find a candidate they can all get behind by the next election. And if that candidate doesn't exactly hold all of their views, I'd hope they vote for them anyway knowing how shit the alternative (trump) is.

We already had that person to rally behind.

 

[HAF2]

We already had that person to rally behind.

And according to the New York Times, you will again in 2020.

Round two, fight!

 

[schuylaar]

You can reason with people who are reasonable.

It's bad enough the 2 major parties are polarized to the point of virtual gridlock.

When polarization happens within a party, it becomes embarrassing.

What about the environment, just to name one (rather fucking important) thing?

You never heard the expression, 'all's fair in love, war and politics'?

There's a whole half a country's worth of voters to fight with. Pick your battles and don't expect perfection.

We've gone so far to the right in the last 35 years, but we're going to argue over DNC rules. Seems somewhat misguided.

Perhaps my understanding is different from yours?

 

[schuylaar]

And according to the New York Times, you will again in 2020.

Round two, fight!

View attachment 3934982

What do you mean?

 

[Big_Lou]

I think he IS some sort of brain tumor.

Fixed!

 

[Big_Lou]

What do you mean?

She means old Bern, shooting for 2020.....

 

[HAF2]

She means old Bern, shooting for 2020.....

View attachment 3934983

Exactly.

(with mortal combat music playing in the background during the election).

 

[schuylaar]

She means old Bern, shooting for 2020.....

View attachment 3934983

Has he announced?

 

[tangerinegreen555]

Fixed!

Thanks, Lou.

Fixing things is important. I've been fixing things for a year and a half now.

I'm going to have to stop squandering my retirement away.

 

[HAF2]

Has he announced?

As far as I read no one has announced but trump.

Hence why I said things like maybe, and possibly. The New York Times article said it a lot better than I could. Also previously cited.

 

[schuylaar]

As far as I read no one has announced but trump.

Hence why I said things like maybe, and possibly. The New York Times article said it a lot better than I could. Also previously cited.

That's not what you said, though.

 

[Big_Lou]

That's not what you said, though.

Sky on the ludicrous nitpick tip.....

 

[HAF2]

That's not what you said, though.

Simple misunderstanding if you weren't reading all of my posts in sucession. If you started at the beginning, I for sure said maybe.

 

[UncleBuck]

As an American, yes Bernie was robbed. DNC has admitted it in court over a lawnd evolsuit, arrogantly stating they don't owe anyone a fair or honest primary and are allowed to pick a candidate against the voter's wishes. In court.

DNC is corrupt. RNC is corrupt. Clintons are super corrupt and evil.

according to you, a trumptard.

we'll take your posts as seriously as the statements of the demented racist liar you voted for, chump.

 

[UncleBuck]