will america ever elect another white male president?

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Except using politics which gains its power via offensive force can't ever be the antidote for offensive force.

Education is good, but when it is administered via a political process, it should really be called indoctrination.
That would depend on the quality of free thinking you think we should have.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I would call it justifiable if it is proportionate.
black customer: hello, i would like to give you money to buy the things you are selling here.

white store owner: GTFO because you are black

rob roy: good use of defensive force, white store owner. very justifiable, peaceful, and proportionate. that black man was using offensive force to rape and enslave you. you fostered civility with your defensive force.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
It's impossible to have a functioning society without law, we already established that, remember?
It's impossible to have an entity purport to "protect you" from those who would coerce you while obtaining its own funding via coercion of you, logic already established that, remember ?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
It's impossible to have an entity purport to "protect you" from those who would coerce you while obtaining its own funding via coercion of you, logic already established that, remember ?
Guess you are having difficulty, getting the station nurse to allow you to turn the TV in the day room. Remember that talk we had about your behavior and what is expected of you in the institution.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
black customer: hello, i would like to give you money to buy the things you are selling here.

white store owner: GTFO because you are black

rob roy: good use of defensive force, white store owner. very justifiable, peaceful, and proportionate. that black man was using offensive force to rape and enslave you. you fostered civility with your defensive force.

If you owned something, is one of the characteristics of that ownership being that the person who owns that something also holds the final say in the who can use it ?



If a person of the same race or a different race than yours, prefers you not to be on their property for any reason, what creates your right to defy their wishes if they own the property and you don't?


The way that you are presenting it, it almost sounds like you think in at least some instances, you would deprive a black person of their right to control their own property and that you'd force them to serve you against their wishes. I don't think it's right if you would force a black person to serve you, if they preferred not to.

Why would you force a black person to serve you, are you a racist ?
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
are you a racist ?
black customer: hello, i would like to give you money to buy the things you are selling here.

white store owner: GTFO because you are black

rob roy: good use of defensive force, white store owner. very justifiable, peaceful, and proportionate. that black man was using offensive force to rape and enslave you. you fostered civility with your defensive force.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
black customer: hello, i would like to give you money to buy the things you are selling here.

white store owner: GTFO because you are black

rob roy: good use of defensive force, white store owner. very justifiable, peaceful, and proportionate. that black man was using offensive force to rape and enslave you. you fostered civility with your defensive force.
you forgot to add.. *goes back to basement with consenting 8 year old
 
Top