will america ever elect another white male president?

[UncleBuck]

"consenting"

 

[srh88]

"consenting"

 

[PCXV]

It's impossible to have an entity purport to "protect you" from those who would coerce you while obtaining its own funding via coercion of you, logic already established that, remember ?

Except there is no coercion, and "protection" is only one small aspect of government function.

A person is born into a society. Society requires order, which requires law. You can leave society, but if you stay you know the implications.

In our representative democracy, the majority party gets some power but there are many roadblocks, checks, and balances in the system. Freedom can be limited but only when the reason is substantial and consensus has been formed over time. Laws change as parties rise and fall. It's not perfect, it's a fuck ton better than whatever hellish anarchist libertarian disorder you are hell bent on.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

Except there is no coercion, and "protection" is only one small aspect of government function.

A person is born into a society. Society requires order, which requires law. You can leave society, but if you stay you know the implications.

In our representative democracy, the majority party gets some power but there are many roadblocks, checks, and balances in the system. Freedom can be limited but only when the reason is substantial and consensus has been formed over time. Laws change as parties rise and fall. It's not perfect, it's a fuck ton better than whatever hellish anarchist libertarian disorder you are hell bent on.

He'll now ask you to define a bunch of words so he can use his normal distortion technique.

 

[Justin-case]

@Rob Roy




So fitting for these times, wouldn't you agree?