Why is Trump so hellbent on killing as many women, children, terminal, and poor people as possible?

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
tampee said:
I never visited why would I apologize? I also did denounce it and used it as a reason we need legal prostitution to cut down on crime. A lot like people use "the marijuana states have less junkies" logic.

I would put money on there being a lot less sex crimes in Alaska with legal prostitution and that's the worst state in the Union for sex crimes.
Click to expand...
You now equate kiddy diddling with paying for sex with an adult. Not even close pedo.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
tampee said:
No meltdown, the only internet porn I've watched is redtube.com they have a gay section for you and Buck too. :)

I don't know why anyone would need more porn, site has it all even a tranny section. I like my woman fully developed I like big tities my wife has double D's. :)
Click to expand...
Backpedal all you want, you were the one who admitted you were looking up child porn.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
I didn't say I was a Minarchist, I said you were defining Minarchism, ONE of the Libertarian ideologies. That Wiki has sources; use them, you fucking fool. If you even know how.

Also, I don't have a 10-year plan, but you could start by cutting tax breaks for the wealthy, not science research vital to human existence on this planet as well as health care for poor women and children, where we need it most.

Also, legalizing marijuana would bring in tax revenue, create jobs, AND do well to reverse climate change.
Click to expand...
Right, you said you were a Libertarian and an Anarchist. An anarchist that wants to legalize stuff. What does legal even mean anyway right?

Tax breaks for the wealthy will not stop or change anything at all to do with what you think is causing climate change. Taxing "the wealthy" at 100% will not eliminate carbon emissions anywhere close to completely or anytime soon.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Which propaganda mill did you copy and paste from this time, Jew hater?
Click to expand...
xmatox said:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/05/23/budget-calls-cuts-va-programs-tradeoff-extending-choice.html


The $186.5 billion budget calls for $2.9 billion in new spending in fiscal 2018, which begins Oct. 1, to fund the Veterans Choice Program, which was created as a temporary measure and allows veterans, in certain instances, to seek health care in the private sector at the VA's expense. Trump's budget also asks for $3.5 billion more for the program in 2019 and every subsequent year.

The increase would bring the total amount that the VA spends through its various community care programs to $13.2 billion in fiscal 2018.

The Choice program -- created in response to the system-wide scandal of veterans suffering long waits for health care -- was set to end Aug. 7, 2017. Congress passed legislation in April allowing it to continue beyond the expiration date with the approximately $1 billion remaining of $10 billion appropriated for the program in 2014.
Click to expand...

Supreme brilliance tonight dude, bravo.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Right, you said you were a Libertarian and an Anarchist. An anarchist that wants to legalize stuff. What does legal even mean anyway right?

Tax breaks for the wealthy will not stop or change anything at all to do with what you think is causing climate change. Taxing "the wealthy" at 100% will not eliminate carbon emissions anywhere close to completely or anytime soon.
Click to expand...
I want to "legalize things" because they are currently in a state of prohibition and they shouldn't be.

And taxing the wealthy will at least balance the budget, which is what we're talking about. When 1% of the population owns 99% of the nation's wealth, I'd call that a lack of balance. If we can't do it politically, I say we take a leaf out of France's 1790s playbook and lop their fucking heads off, and if you are on the side of the oppressors, I have no problem severing yours at the neck, as well.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Right, you said you were a Libertarian and an Anarchist. An anarchist that wants to legalize stuff. What does legal even mean anyway right?

Tax breaks for the wealthy will not stop or change anything at all to do with what you think is causing climate change. Taxing "the wealthy" at 100% will not eliminate carbon emissions anywhere close to completely or anytime soon.
Click to expand...
Taxes in other instances have proven effective at encouraging behavior in the right direction.

Who ever said carbon emissions taxes would eliminate carbon emissions? That's a straw man argument. Dude, you aren't talking to six year olds.

An argument against carbon taxes is they would create a revenue stream and conflict of interest in ending carbon emissions. Its a fake argument. But, if you had made that argument, at least you wouldn't sound foolish like you did in your post. Instead, you chose the foolish argument.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
xmatox said:
Where is the increase for ACTUAL veteran care? $13.2 billion increase to fund a crappy temp program because the VA hospitals are a joke, and the staff are understaffed. My father was in a VA in Texas receiving chemo, and there were cockroaches in the ICU. That's some third world country status, and really our current VA budget is $185 Billion in return for endless pill prescriptions and shittier healthcare than the Russian's get. I don't see anyone auditing the current situation, which means no one really cares what is going on. You obviously know fuck all about VA, so I'd probably wouldn't go down that road with me.
Click to expand...
You're right. I really don't know about the va. Personally I would like to see all the troops home safe and sound and the saving alone from that should be plenty to fix va' s and stop treating vets like shit.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
xmatox said:
You're still a trump supporting piece of shit :dunce:.
Click to expand...
I was talking to bunk, pointing out it was your source I quotes from. ok dude? Jeez.
Buck just said your source is a jew hating conspiracy site, and your still trying to beef it up with me. So precious.
 
xmatox

xmatox

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
I was talking to bunk, pointing out it was your source I quotes from. ok dude? Jeez.
Buck just said your source is a jew hating conspiracy site, and your still trying to beef it up with me. So precious.
Click to expand...
Maybe he knows something I don't, but you still keep diverting from the fact you're a moron and literally almost every post you've made is complete bullshit.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
I want to "legalize things" because they are currently in a state of prohibition and they shouldn't be.

And taxing the wealthy will at least balance the budget, which is what we're talking about. When 1% of the population owns 99% of the nation's wealth, I'd call that a lack of balance. If we can't do it politically, I say we take a leaf out of France's 1790s playbook and lop their fucking heads off, and if you are on the side of the oppressors, I have no problem severing yours at the neck, as well.
Click to expand...
Get some!

Tax "the wealthy" at 100%, what number did you come up with?

Fwiw if you wanted to make shit lawful instead of legal it would be closer to your anarchist views, by eliminating more state.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top