UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you admitted repeatedly that you visited sites with child por, and you even defended it. why?I never visited why would I apologize?
you admitted repeatedly that you visited sites with child por, and you even defended it. why?I never visited why would I apologize?
The majority of the nation's wealth. Because the 1% own the majority of the nation's wealth, and that's obviously more than the lower 99%. That's easily enough to fix the budget. If you disagree, you're literally brain dead.Get some!
Tax "the wealthy" at 100%, what number did you come up with?
You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.Taxes in other instances have proven effective at encouraging behavior in the right direction.
Who ever said carbon emissions taxes would eliminate carbon emissions? That's a straw man argument. Dude, you aren't talking to six year olds.
An argument against carbon taxes is they would create a revenue stream and conflict of interest in ending carbon emissions. Its a fake argument. But, if you had made that argument, at least you wouldn't sound foolish like you did in your post. Instead, you chose the foolish argument.
Actually, we have. It's a scientific fact it increases atmospheric temperatures in the same way adding salt to a pot of water lowers its boiling point.You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.
i just assume whatever you post is from some propaganda mill or the other. i didn't even read it.I was talking to bunk, pointing out it was your source I quotes from. ok dude? Jeez.
Buck just said your source is a jew hating conspiracy site, and your still trying to beef it up with me. So precious.
the only person who would argue for the shit you argue for would have to paid or incredibly stupid.You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.
Put your mouth over a fucking exhaust pipe and inhale the fresh air.You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.
You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?The majority of the nation's wealth. Because the 1% own the majority of the nation's wealth, and that's obviously more than the lower 99%. That's easily enough to fix the budget. If you disagree, you're literally brain dead.
You and I should meet up. Loser dies.
who said to tax the wealthy at 100%?You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?
If you tax the wealthy, at 100% for fy 2017....what number do you get?
Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite. Link me a climate thread and I will meet you over there dude.Actually, we have. It's a scientific fact it increases atmospheric temperatures in the same way adding salt to a pot of water lowers its boiling point.
The 1% acquired the money they have through dubious and unsavory means, fucking the other 99%. That property isn't theirs. If people are dying due to their negligence and corporate theft, their life and property should be forfeit and the wealth redistributed.You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?
If you tax the wealthy, at 100% for fy 2017....what number do you get?
FIFYYou can't prove to me that carbon is a pollutant.
Yes, we have. You're deluded and uneducated.Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite. Link me a climate thread and I will meet you over there dude.
Get better bait.
Your avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. LolPut your mouth over a fucking exhaust pipe and inhale the fresh air.
Jesus fucking Christ already.
again, only someone who is really fucking dumb (to the point of literal mental retardation) would say that. or you'd have to be paid so spew such obvious lies.Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite.
did you like rawn pawl because he, like you, felt that if you made him serve the "purples" you'd just hate 'em more now?Your avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. Lol
It's nice you show your support for that with every post.
Well of course not a mercenary is paid way more than a pawn but they also don't have the entire force of the US military on their side. Not to mention most mercenaries are veterans of military so you can still get much better than hazard duty pay unless you lost a limb or something. I look at like the best opportunity for a pawn personally.I highly doubt that. I was in the shit, and wasn't paid anywhere near what the job was worth. How about let's stop paying contractors billions when our military is capable of 90% of the shit they do.
you sound shit stupid in every single post you make.Well of course not a mercenary is paid way more than a pawn but they also don't have the entire force of the US military on their side. Not to mention most mercenaries are veterans of military so you can still get much better than hazard duty pay unless you lost a limb or something. I look at like the best opportunity for a pawn personally.
Only problem with the US military not paying contractors is the same as road crews, if they don't spend the entire budget they will get less money next year.
Google the fucking imageYour avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. Lol
It's nice you show your support for that with every post.
You want to confiscate Disney world to pay for social justice. Got it.The 1% acquired the money they have through dubious and unsavory means, fucking the other 99%. That property isn't theirs. If people are dying due to their negligence and corporate theft, their life and property should be forfeit and the wealth redistributed.