Why is Trump so hellbent on killing as many women, children, terminal, and poor people as possible?

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
It was illegal. So you think its fine for a 17 year old man to fuck a 14 year old girl? You know it's not right.

I'm 30 been with the same woman almost 9 years and I wasn't a virgin never thought about having sex with a 14 year old girl when I was 17 I also knew it was illegal if the girl is 13 you are straight up a pedophile don't matter if you are 16 you will be registered for life for molesting a child 13 and under.

I didn't make the laws but 13 the titties are just barely growing still even at 16.

You are the one justifying pedophilia I just seen 2 links to child porn on the darknet. You are much worse. LMFAO
Sir, doth does protest far FAR too fucking much.

Unlike you, I'm not a paedophile so I don't think about it that much.

I know adults and kids is no bueno, thats all I need.

So where were these child porn links hosted that you "stumbled upon"? What kinda fucked up shit were you browsing?
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
Ahhhh- but it's okay for you to condone its causes, just because you'll be able to avoid the consequences.

Why is it that every time I scratch a right winger's arguments, their moral pedestal crumbles?
The dinosaurs died off, eventually we will die off it's the cycle of life on Earth.

If it helps I actually grow outdoors unlike you and I don't drive much, what are you doing about your carbon footprint?
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
Sir, doth does protest far FAR too fucking much.

Unlike you, I'm not a paedophile so I don't think about it that much.

I know adults and kids is no bueno, thats all I need.

So where were these child porn links hosted that you "stumbled upon"? What kinda fucked up shit were you browsing?
Do you agree that a 17 year old man should be able to fuck a 14 year old girl? Sounds pretty bad too me.

I was on Hidden Wiki it had links to hit men, drug markets, guns, explosives and pretty much anything on the darknet I only bitched about the 2 links to child porn. Never tried to justify fucking a 14 year old like you.
 

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
Do you agree that a 17 year old man should be able to fuck a 14 year old girl? Sounds pretty bad too me.

I was on Hidden Wiki it had links to hit men, drug markets, guns, explosives and pretty much anything on the darknet I only bitched about the 2 links to child porn. Never tried to justify fucking a 14 year old like you.
Trampee and boy on Karaoke Night:

 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
The wall is fucking stupid. I've said that many times.

And yes, fuck the EPA. Fuck it very hard. What has it done for Flint exactly?
fuck the EPA hard, eh?
and what has it done for flint?
well, let me very quickly show an example of your sad failure on this whole thing
so, what the EPA did for flint.. well, only a mere 100 fuckin million dollars to redo their water pipes, but that ain't much..

..
well alright, well first things first, ya shoulda armed yourself a lil better in this one my man.. and i even gave ya a fair warning about incorrect information already, but here ya are.
i thought we went over this already? about not researching stuff before you post incorrect stupid shit on a public forum?


may wanna cover your eyes on this one....

Soo...the EPA....
well, funny enough my job is somewhat associated with them, not to mention my abnormal zeal for my occupation and it's relation to air quality

so..

lets start with the simple... ya ever hear about a lil thing called the TSCA?
the toxic substances control act?...
no?

well heres a simple example for ya
Ever hear of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane?
you know.. that one pesticide? No?
Ah, you may know it under it's more familiar acronym...
DDT?
ya, well in case you live on the moon and never heard as to why, it's um, baaad... potentially has up to 30 yr Half-life in the soil, so it was banned in the US in the early 70s, it's being detected in many areas STILL...
who took care of banning that?
or the thousands of other chemicals they have saved us from..?

ok, so, what about if saaayyy... hmmm mayyyybe, I don't know.. do ya ever eat fruit or veggies?
with alllll the pesticides, miticides, fungicides and herbicides, and whatever-cides that farms spray on there?...
you do understand that it's the EPA that tests, analyzes, and either passes or condemns the usage of ALL chemicals in that regard? Right?

what does it do for allllll the shit that people are spraying on our food?
lets pretend that sheerly on JUST that argument alone, that the EPA still ISNT fuckin crucial.

alright, so what about all the chemicals in the workplace?
an example like, i don't know, maybe things like, hmm, that one material that, is sorta responsible for killing thousands and thousands, if not millions of workers, slowly dying, no less, in a wonderful slow painful manner?
yea, good ole asbestos.
that's harmless right, we didn't need to have that banned by the EPA, did we?
nah, fuck them..
fuck them "very hard"..

it's ok though, i mean we shouldn't even be needing to consider that the companies manufacturing those harmful chemicals totally have our best interests in mind, right? Not profit?
we can rely on them not making anything harmful, right?
shit, trumps epa has already made news by denying a ban-request on a controversial neurotoxin to be used as a pesticide
good ole scott pruit
I won't even start on that motherfucker..

need more?
ok.

so what about the, you know, that smaaaall thing called The Clean Air Act?
Ever see pictures of san jose or san Francisco in the 70s?
the multitude of carcinogens coming from your, and everyone else's car?

so you happen to know anyone with cancer?
who mandates and regulates what levels of harmful pollution/cancer causing shit that is emitted by your car?
you, uh, ever take a niiiice gander at what the air looks like in China?
they have approx. three-quarters of million fuckin people that die prematurely per YEAR, in just china alone from air pollution.
(in case your math skills are around the level of your decision-making, and information-gathering acumen, i'll break that down to numbers. that's 750,000 people a yr)

and why is that do ya think?

the amount of solid particulates in the Chinese people's lungs is more than a meth-fueled chain-smoker's lungs


yea, but forget about all that.

Lets just run another lil scenario for you, and whoever else that wants to disregard the EPA's importance..
all those tiny selectively-obtuse-scrotal-sack-hanging-trump-supporters..
Ever hear of a thing called the Superfund?
course not, or you wouldn't have made such a categorically egregious statement ...

Lets just say that, umm, maybe the united states has, I don't know, like 99 fuckin nuclear power plants going on in damn near all states, def the most populous states anyways, so lets say that juuust one of em has some sort of an emergency leakage of any sort of nuclear waste, like the Japanese accident, or Chernobyl.. something like that happens, what now?
well?
what then?
ya gonna go get some shovels and a paper breathing mask and maybe a firehose to "wash" all that nuclear waste away?

who do you call for that exactly?
the EPA. and The aforementioned superfund is what pays for it all.

alright,so lets just ignore and disregard that reason also, here's yet another

you ever hear about that invisible lil shield around the earth that protects us from radiation?
well, since you are a trump-guy I imagine in your mythical fairy-world that if you don't see something, it can't be real then, right?
well the ozone is sort of an important thing in case ya didn't know..
so those CFC's that pretty much vaporized a whoooole lot of that ozone layer, well, it was the EPA that saved our asses there too

but hey, that shit is all superfluous, I mean after all, skin cancer builds character.



or maybe you have heard about the, exxon valdex oil spill?
or a lil more recent, that itsy bitsy oil spill in the gulf?
I wonder who cleans all that shit up?

or who regulates and mandates emission limits on the energy-industry pollution?



so fuck it, yea, just go riiiiight ahead and show everyone reading just how foolish you are making yourself out to be, and considering your political views, I can't say that surprises me...
luckily the nation doesn't rely on tools like you to vote and decide who runs the nation....

uh.. wait a second...
shit..
nevermind that last part..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
They're your charts.
You drew your conclusion then manipulated the surface data to feed the conclusion. It's an actual fact.
Here's mine
View attachment 3948882

But that's not extreme enough for you alarmists....now show us the highly controversial land surface data.

All climate research should focus on our very limited understanding of ocean systems at this point......but instead, we are all gonna drown, save the children.
are you retarded, or paid to spam this shit?
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
Also, legalizing marijuana would bring in tax revenue, create jobs, AND do well to reverse climate change.
ah ya know I love ya man, but legalized marijuana would badly tax the energy grid, we are seeing it in California already, for yrs, when prop 215 passed it started a lil, but the last 5 yrs or so the proliferation of pot-growers has exploded... and considering the massive amount of energy used it's surely not gonna help reverse global warming at all
in fact it's arguable that it's be fairly bad for the GHG levels.
but in all reality?
lets face it...
barring a massive catastrophe and a marked drop in human population there isn't anything that we could do to reverse the global warming
ice that is thousands of yrs old is melting.. and that not only loses the fresh water, raises water levels, but also considering that glaciers are essentially gigantic ice cubes, people often fail to consider that the glacier itself cools the planet simply by being present
that coupled with deforestation, the amount of cattle raised for food, the waste produced by the overpopulation and even to the degree of the sheer fact of how much each fuckin human breathes even...
it's all only gonna get worse

and it ain't gonna stop man, we can only slow it, but sadly we are seeing it alllll happen much faster than even the most paranoid scientists predicted.
a snowball effect so to speak.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
ah ya know I love ya man, but legalized marijuana would badly tax the energy grid, we are seeing it in California already, for yrs, when prop 215 passed it started a lil, but the last 5 yrs or so the proliferation of pot-growers has exploded... and considering the massive amount of energy used it's surely not gonna help reverse global warming at all
in fact it's arguable that it's be fairly bad for the GHG levels.
but in all reality?
lets face it...
barring a massive catastrophe and a marked drop in human population there isn't anything that we could do to reverse the global warming
ice that is thousands of yrs old is melting.. and that not only loses the fresh water, raises water levels, but also considering that glaciers are essentially gigantic ice cubes, people often fail to consider that the glacier itself cools the planet simply by being present
that coupled with deforestation, the amount of cattle raised for food, the waste produced by the overpopulation and even to the degree of the sheer fact of how much each fuckin human breathes even...
it's all only gonna get worse

and it ain't gonna stop man, we can only slow it, but sadly we are seeing it alllll happen much faster than even the most paranoid scientists predicted.
a snowball effect so to speak.
I get it. Maybe growing outdoors or with COBs would help? I dunno, most people use HPS, so who knows?
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
You should relax. Notice no-one is reciprocating your hate. You're ok in my book albeit a bit emotional. I attribute that to your service in fighting for my freedom and I appreciate it.

I ride a klr650 single cylinder motorcycle every day. I'm doing more for the planet than any of you eco alarmists ever will.

Think about that.
I can now ride from SF to S. Lake Tahoe without having to remove any bugs from my fairing.
Sandblasting makes bugs a non issue on the way back.

Study finds wind speeds on the rise

Think about that.

 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I get it. Maybe growing outdoors or with COBs would help? I dunno, most people use HPS, so who knows?
COBs help a lot. Not just efficient energy conversion but lower heat load. @ttystikk has figured out how to re-use the waste heat too. I grow outdoors. Product wasn't top shelf but pretty good. Given their longer season, I don't know why any non-commercial grower living in CA would want to go to the trouble of indoor growing if they can use the sun. But it's complicated down there. Some don't have a choice. So, COBs.

I've read that commercial growers are reluctant to migrate to COBs because their business and grow operation are already tuned to HPS.

@greasemonkeymann , I've read enough of your posts to know your heart is in the right place when it comes to environmental issues. I'm guessing your aren't arguing that no action in reducing fossil fuels need be taken because it's already to late. I agree that we've already caused harm with our emissions and there is no stopping global warming in the short term. The only question is how much global warming will we eventually cause? To me, this is not a reason for taking no action.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
fuck the EPA hard, eh?
and what has it done for flint?
well, let me very quickly show an example of your sad failure on this whole thing
so, what the EPA did for flint.. well, only a mere 100 fuckin million dollars to redo their water pipes, but that ain't much..

..
well alright, well first things first, ya shoulda armed yourself a lil better in this one my man.. and i even gave ya a fair warning about incorrect information already, but here ya are.
i thought we went over this already? about not researching stuff before you post incorrect stupid shit on a public forum?


may wanna cover your eyes on this one....

Soo...the EPA....
well, funny enough my job is somewhat associated with them, not to mention my abnormal zeal for my occupation and it's relation to air quality

so..

lets start with the simple... ya ever hear about a lil thing called the TSCA?
the toxic substances control act?...
no?

well heres a simple example for ya
Ever hear of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane?
you know.. that one pesticide? No?
Ah, you may know it under it's more familiar acronym...
DDT?
ya, well in case you live on the moon and never heard as to why, it's um, baaad... potentially has up to 30 yr Half-life in the soil, so it was banned in the US in the early 70s, it's being detected in many areas STILL...
who took care of banning that?
or the thousands of other chemicals they have saved us from..?

ok, so, what about if saaayyy... hmmm mayyyybe, I don't know.. do ya ever eat fruit or veggies?
with alllll the pesticides, miticides, fungicides and herbicides, and whatever-cides that farms spray on there?...
you do understand that it's the EPA that tests, analyzes, and either passes or condemns the usage of ALL chemicals in that regard? Right?

what does it do for allllll the shit that people are spraying on our food?
lets pretend that sheerly on JUST that argument alone, that the EPA still ISNT fuckin crucial.

alright, so what about all the chemicals in the workplace?
an example like, i don't know, maybe things like, hmm, that one material that, is sorta responsible for killing thousands and thousands, if not millions of workers, slowly dying, no less, in a wonderful slow painful manner?
yea, good ole asbestos.
that's harmless right, we didn't need to have that banned by the EPA, did we?
nah, fuck them..
fuck them "very hard"..

it's ok though, i mean we shouldn't even be needing to consider that the companies manufacturing those harmful chemicals totally have our best interests in mind, right? Not profit?
we can rely on them not making anything harmful, right?
shit, trumps epa has already made news by denying a ban-request on a controversial neurotoxin to be used as a pesticide
good ole scott pruit
I won't even start on that motherfucker..

need more?
ok.

so what about the, you know, that smaaaall thing called The Clean Air Act?
Ever see pictures of san jose or san Francisco in the 70s?
the multitude of carcinogens coming from your, and everyone else's car?

so you happen to know anyone with cancer?
who mandates and regulates what levels of harmful pollution/cancer causing shit that is emitted by your car?
you, uh, ever take a niiiice gander at what the air looks like in China?
they have approx. three-quarters of million fuckin people that die prematurely per YEAR, in just china alone from air pollution.
(in case your math skills are around the level of your decision-making, and information-gathering acumen, i'll break that down to numbers. that's 750,000 people a yr)

and why is that do ya think?

the amount of solid particulates in the Chinese people's lungs is more than a meth-fueled chain-smoker's lungs


yea, but forget about all that.

Lets just run another lil scenario for you, and whoever else that wants to disregard the EPA's importance..
all those tiny selectively-obtuse-scrotal-sack-hanging-trump-supporters..
Ever hear of a thing called the Superfund?
course not, or you wouldn't have made such a categorically egregious statement ...

Lets just say that, umm, maybe the united states has, I don't know, like 99 fuckin nuclear power plants going on in damn near all states, def the most populous states anyways, so lets say that juuust one of em has some sort of an emergency leakage of any sort of nuclear waste, like the Japanese accident, or Chernobyl.. something like that happens, what now?
well?
what then?
ya gonna go get some shovels and a paper breathing mask and maybe a firehose to "wash" all that nuclear waste away?

who do you call for that exactly?
the EPA. and The aforementioned superfund is what pays for it all.

alright,so lets just ignore and disregard that reason also, here's yet another

you ever hear about that invisible lil shield around the earth that protects us from radiation?
well, since you are a trump-guy I imagine in your mythical fairy-world that if you don't see something, it can't be real then, right?
well the ozone is sort of an important thing in case ya didn't know..
so those CFC's that pretty much vaporized a whoooole lot of that ozone layer, well, it was the EPA that saved our asses there too

but hey, that shit is all superfluous, I mean after all, skin cancer builds character.



or maybe you have heard about the, exxon valdex oil spill?
or a lil more recent, that itsy bitsy oil spill in the gulf?
I wonder who cleans all that shit up?

or who regulates and mandates emission limits on the energy-industry pollution?



so fuck it, yea, just go riiiiight ahead and show everyone reading just how foolish you are making yourself out to be, and considering your political views, I can't say that surprises me...
luckily the nation doesn't rely on tools like you to vote and decide who runs the nation....

uh.. wait a second...
shit..
nevermind that last part..
The epa had authority and sufficient information to issue an emergency order in flint in June 2015.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
COBs help a lot. Not just efficient energy conversion but lower heat load. @ttystikk has figured out how to re-use the waste heat too. I grow outdoors. Product wasn't top shelf but pretty good. Given their longer season, I don't know why any non-commercial grower living in CA would want to go to the trouble of indoor growing if they can use the sun. But it's complicated down there. Some don't have a choice. So, COBs.

I've read that commercial growers are reluctant to migrate to COBs because their business and grow operation are already tuned to HPS.

@greasemonkeymann , I've read enough of your posts to know your heart is in the right place when it comes to environmental issues. I'm guessing your aren't arguing that no action in reducing fossil fuels need be taken because it's already to late. I agree that we've already caused harm with our emissions and there is no stopping global warming in the short term. The only question is how much global warming will we eventually cause? To me, this is not a reason for taking no action.
You guys should give induction a good hard look.
 
Top