World Laughs at US Again ..USA more a joke than ever ..lol

vostok

Well-Known Member
Paris climate deal: Trump pulls US out of 2015 accord

President Donald Trump has announced that the US is withdrawing from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

He said moves to negotiate a new "fair" deal that would not disadvantage US businesses and workers would begin.

Mr Trump said during last year's presidential election campaign that he would take the step to help his country's oil and coal industries.

Opponents say withdrawing from the accord is an abdication of US leadership on a key global challenge.

The Paris agreement commits the US and 187 other countries to keeping global temperatures
rises "well below" 2C (3.6F) and "endeavour to limit" them even more,
to 1.5C.

Only Syria and Nicaragua did not sign up to the deal.

(http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40127326)

pp/
"President Trump's speech was confused nonsense," said Bob Ward from the
UK's Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change.

"He announced that the United States will withdraw from the Paris Agreement
on climate change, while also launching negotiations to re-enter the Agreement.

"But the Agreement states that no country can withdraw within three years of it
coming into force, and the process of withdrawal takes a further year to complete.

Mr Ward continued: "That means the United States cannot complete withdrawal
from the Paris Agreement before 5 November 2020, the day after the next
Presidential election in the United States.
So Mr Trump will not have withdrawn from the Agreement within this Presidential term."
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Paris climate deal: Trump pulls US out of 2015 accord
President Donald Trump has announced that the US is withdrawing from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

He said moves to negotiate a new "fair" deal that would not disadvantage US businesses and workers would begin.

Mr Trump said during last year's presidential election campaign that he would take the step to help his country's oil and coal industries.

Opponents say withdrawing from the accord is an abdication of US leadership on a key global challenge.

The Paris agreement commits the US and 187 other countries to keeping global temperatures
rises "well below" 2C (3.6F) and "endeavour to limit" them even more,
to 1.5C.

Only Syria and Nicaragua did not sign up to the deal.

(http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40127326)
and nicaragua refused to sign because they said the deal does not go far enough. they are very much going to cooperate with the deal even if they are not in it officially.

so it's just us and syria now.
 

goldberg71b

Well-Known Member
Em...China has a larger military than ALL other countries combined.
They don't rely on facts around here often. Just spew their agenda and minipulate facts. Fact is if Obama wanted a deal like this to work he would have treated it as a TREATY. But he knew it wouldn't pass. So once again to force this on us he found a way to get around things. Once again his pencil wasn't sharp enough and another piece of his crappy legacy has been erased! I said it while everyone was cheering him on. None of his shit will last because he chose to go it alone. If he had done things the way they should have been done healthcare would have been fixed before it became law. But they couldn't get the votes thanks to Massachusetts electing Scott brown. Even Massachusetts heavily democratic sent a republican there to stop it. But obama didn't let that stop him so they let a poorly written law exist as it was. That's why the law hasn't worked and is so terrible.

This climate deal because OBAMA didn't treat it as a treaty once again makes it easier to disappear. Needless to say there's no means of enforcement in the agreement. Nor does it prevent the 2 largest polluters from continuing to pollute. That might change in 2030 but screws us between now and then. When we are cleaner to begin with. Trump didn't remove any existing law that promotes clean air! He just said we're not taking it on the chin while other countries carry on polluting like there's no tomorrow. No more America paying for the world. If the goal is less pollution then those who pollute the most China and India should be paying the most.
 

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
If the goal is less pollution then those who pollute the most China and India should be paying he most.bingo @goldberg71b but the problem is these dems get their feelerz hurt every time the president trys to fix problems from the previous admin.
 

goldberg71b

Well-Known Member
If the goal is less pollution then those who pollute the most China and India should be paying he most.bingo @goldberg71b but the problem is these dems get their feelerz hurt every time the president trys to fix problems from the previous admin.
I know they bought the crap hook line and sinker. And praised him as if he was a god. So seeing the few things he did being so easily erased has to hurt! If they felt so strongly about this deal when the republicans said a deal like this is a treaty agreement and should be treated as such the Dems would have agreed IF THEY WANTED IT TO LAST! If it were a treaty we couldn't walk away like we just did. But in order for something like this to have passed a treaty referendum big changes would have needed to have been made. That might have meant obama would have actually had to do some hard work. Even his democratic legislators said he didn't work with congress! But the Dems forget about that part!
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Em...China has a larger military than ALL other countries combined.
AK 47's aren't much of a match for B52's dropping 60,000 pounds of bombs 'round the fucking clock...and that's before we even get to the cruise missles.

China doesn't even have a blue water navy. They have as much chance against the U.S. as a one legged indian at an ass kicking contest.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
I know they bought the crap hook line and sinker. And praised him as if he was a god. So seeing the few things he did being so easily erased has to hurt! If they felt so strongly about this deal when the republicans said a deal like this is a treaty agreement and should be treated as such the Dems would have agreed IF THEY WANTED IT TO LAST! If it were a treaty we couldn't walk away like we just did. But in order for something like this to have passed a treaty referendum big changes would have needed to have been made. That might have meant obama would have actually had to do some hard work. Even his democratic legislators said he didn't work with congress! But the Dems forget about that part!
You've really got the hots for Barack's cock, eh? Don't be shy about it; 95% of your republitrash peers fantasize about Obama drilling their (fat, old) wives, as well.

In psychological terms, you are suffering from repression-based manifestations, IE: outwardly appearing to have great disdain for a person/place/thing while secretly being infatuated/consumed by it.
 

Nugachino

Well-Known Member
They don't rely on facts around here often. Just spew their agenda and minipulate facts. Fact is if Obama wanted a deal like this to work he would have treated it as a TREATY. But he knew it wouldn't pass. So once again to force this on us he found a way to get around things. Once again his pencil wasn't sharp enough and another piece of his crappy legacy has been erased! I said it while everyone was cheering him on. None of his shit will last because he chose to go it alone. If he had done things the way they should have been done healthcare would have been fixed before it became law. But they couldn't get the votes thanks to Massachusetts electing Scott brown. Even Massachusetts heavily democratic sent a republican there to stop it. But obama didn't let that stop him so they let a poorly written law exist as it was. That's why the law hasn't worked and is so terrible.

This climate deal because OBAMA didn't treat it as a treaty once again makes it easier to disappear. Needless to say there's no means of enforcement in the agreement. Nor does it prevent the 2 largest polluters from continuing to pollute. That might change in 2030 but screws us between now and then. When we are cleaner to begin with. Trump didn't remove any existing law that promotes clean air! He just said we're not taking it on the chin while other countries carry on polluting like there's no tomorrow. No more America paying for the world. If the goal is less pollution then those who pollute the most China and India should be paying the most.

You know why those countries produce the most greenhouse gas. Because that is where all your shit comes from. They make it all. And how does it get made. With smog spewing factories running on outdated tech. Because you want it cheap. And you want it right fuckin now.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
You know why those countries produce the most greenhouse gas. Because that is where all your shit comes from. They make it all. And how does it get made. With smog spewing factories running on outdated tech. Because you want it cheap. And you want it right fuckin now.
He's monumentally stupid. It's embarrassing.

Drumpf drone: "This damned LAKE is a polluted CESSPOOL!! I can't even SWIM in it anymore let alone DRINK from it!! GOD DAMMIT THEYYYY did this!!"

Person born with a functioning brain: "Wait, didn't you spend years dumping toxic waste into that lake, polluting it yourself?"

DD: "That's NOT the point...I mean...I....*#$%^@#$#% HILLARYOBUMMEREMAILLLZZZMAGAMURICAFURSSSTTT!!!"

P: "sigh"

Rinse, repeat, recycle puppet accounts.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
To know one's opponent it is important to know their propaganda.

This clip shows the 'logic' used to justify the Chump move to walk away from the climate deal.

It's Strawman after Strawman, no effort made to connecting the points, just tossing them out there;
My favorite is the notion that walking away from climate change will increase American wages in the heartland.

No effort made to make the actual connection in any way, just tossing the canard out there with nothing at all to back it up.

Belief is more powerful than facts to these people because facts require the ability to think logically.

Feel free to watch this piece and critique. There's lots of this same thing going on.
 
Last edited:

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
In psychological terms, you are suffering from repression-based manifestations, IE: outwardly appearing to have great disdain for a person/place/thing while secretly being infatuated/consumed by it.

In other words, I'm in your head. Mention me again, Salmontooth.
 

xmatox

Well-Known Member
Em...China has a larger military than ALL other countries combined.
Wtf. Indias army is larger, Russia is a close second, plus a few more... "Larger military than all other countries combined", kiss my dick. The amount of bullshit that comes from some of your dirty ass mouths is astonishing.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Wtf. Indias army is larger, Russia is a close second, plus a few more... "Larger military than all other countries combined", kiss my dick. The amount of bullshit that comes from some of your dirty ass mouths is astonishing.
America's military budget is larger than the next dozen largest combined. In an age of mechanized war and technological weaponry, I think this is a much more salient statistic than 'number of live bodies in uniform'.

And yes, Stinkydigit gets a lot of basic facts completely wrong, which leads directly to his inability to make logical judgements.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I know they bought the crap hook line and sinker. And praised him as if he was a god. So seeing the few things he did being so easily erased has to hurt! If they felt so strongly about this deal when the republicans said a deal like this is a treaty agreement and should be treated as such the Dems would have agreed IF THEY WANTED IT TO LAST! If it were a treaty we couldn't walk away like we just did. But in order for something like this to have passed a treaty referendum big changes would have needed to have been made. That might have meant obama would have actually had to do some hard work. Even his democratic legislators said he didn't work with congress! But the Dems forget about that part!
So how much longer are right wingers going to blame OBAMA! for how fucked up the economy is under their watch?

I notice y'all never take credit for the Great Crash of 2008. Why is that? Bush had been in office for 8 years- was it still CLINTON'S! fault, even after all that time?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
They don't rely on facts around here often. Just spew their agenda and minipulate facts. Fact is if Obama wanted a deal like this to work he would have treated it as a TREATY. But he knew it wouldn't pass. So once again to force this on us he found a way to get around things. Once again his pencil wasn't sharp enough and another piece of his crappy legacy has been erased! I said it while everyone was cheering him on. None of his shit will last because he chose to go it alone. If he had done things the way they should have been done healthcare would have been fixed before it became law. But they couldn't get the votes thanks to Massachusetts electing Scott brown. Even Massachusetts heavily democratic sent a republican there to stop it. But obama didn't let that stop him so they let a poorly written law exist as it was. That's why the law hasn't worked and is so terrible.

This climate deal because OBAMA didn't treat it as a treaty once again makes it easier to disappear. Needless to say there's no means of enforcement in the agreement. Nor does it prevent the 2 largest polluters from continuing to pollute. That might change in 2030 but screws us between now and then. When we are cleaner to begin with. Trump didn't remove any existing law that promotes clean air! He just said we're not taking it on the chin while other countries carry on polluting like there's no tomorrow. No more America paying for the world. If the goal is less pollution then those who pollute the most China and India should be paying the most.
what does minipuilate mean? It's in the very beginning of your diatribe and simply derails the rest of the passage.
 
Top