Why do some have problems with people of different color

Why do some hate based on color of skin

  • fear of the unknown

    Votes: 22 48.9%
  • Jealousy

    Votes: 7 15.6%
  • taught

    Votes: 23 51.1%
  • confusion

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • small penis

    Votes: 25 55.6%

  • Total voters
    45

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
you compare ordering lunch to rape and slavery you racist retard.

also, you are ON NOTICE now
I compared several kinds of involuntary human relationships all involving an instance where one party was forced into an association they would prefer not to have had. Some as you point out are more heinous than others, yet they ALL use similar tactics to effectuate.

You, likely would say you are against slavery and rape, but you do seem to endorse other kinds of human relations where one party has their choice to disassociate removed under threat of force.

Because a person holds beliefs you don't like, you are willing to ignore their right to self determination of themselves or their property. I'm not willing to do that, because nobody here can tell me where that right comes from. Would you like to try ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You are a racist asshole no matter how many times you repeat this same nonsense. Accept it and then work on it. This is your only path to becoming a happier and less frightened individual. I'm throwing you a lifeline. Take it.

I'd agree with you if you were right, but you are not.

I think racists are doing it wrong. Coincidentally, I think people who take away another persons right to determine the use of their own body and their property are wrong too. How about you?

Also, there's no need to insult, use your big boy words to persuade me why it's okay to force another person to associate with somebody.
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No one is forcing you to do anything, dipshit. Your entire premise is fucked. You are fucked. If you can't change, hopefully you'll die soon. You're just wasting space here.
You seem rather focused on me, rather than on any ideas we may disagree on.

My premise is based in the idea that human interactions are best if they are mutually entered into. Your premise is not.

Can you refute that? I don't think you can.

Also, calling me a racist is absurd and demonstrates a severe lack of comprehension on your part. While I don't like racists, you've not shown me where anyone gets the right to dictate the use of anothers property or anothers body.

Your premise indicates that you think it IS okay to force people to associate when one party would prefer not to.
That's the same premise racist slaveholders used as a rationale isn't it?
 

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
Should I start at the beginning ?

Private property is redundant. Public property is an oxymoron.
Bzzzzzzzzzt!. You're free to withdraw from society. You won't be missed. If you decide to stay, you are bound to the same laws and expectations as everyone else. Your choice, you mind numbingly stupid jackass. Leave or stay. Just stop the incessant whining. Thanks.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Bzzzzzzzzzt!. You're free to withdraw from society. You won't be missed. If you decide to stay, you are bound to the same laws and expectations as everyone else. Your choice, you mind numbingly stupid jackass. Leave or stay. Just stop the incessant whining. Thanks.

I am bound not to run others lives for them, as they long as they don't try to run mine.

Also, you've confused government edicts and laws with society, they are not the same thing.

You're welcome.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Expound, skidmark.

Private property is redundant. Public property is an oxymoron.
If you were astute enough to understand the foregoing, the argument would be over, but you're not.


Who has the right to determine the use of another person's body or another person's property ?

I don't. Do you?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I was asked to start a thread about this. @twostrokenut has a problem with people of different colors. He labels them as purple people. Why does he feel this way ? Is it him ? Does he feel insecure about himself ? What is the reasoning ?
Asked?..you mean some PMs were swapped and you're all raging..how many of you are black AND voted?

You see where we're going here?

Hence, the thread about black populace not voting complete with citations.

But it's me..not you.:wall:
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Look, shithead. We've been over this many times (here and grassshitty) and many other people have tried to smack some sense into you. You're an obtuse jackass and don't have a clue what you are talking about. The society you continue to live in has established that public property is NOT an oxymoron. Don't like it? Withdraw. I will not waste any more logic and reason on you. You are incapable of using it. I will still reply to you (because poking the stupid with a stick is a guilty pleasure of mine), but from now on, it'll just be for fun. I give up on you.

A consensus of people who all agree to something which is obviously contradictory doesn't change the contradiction.

Also, your statement that "society" agreed to it, is in error. You continue to conflate society and government edicts as if they are the same thing. They aren't
I think most people believe they should determine the use of their own body and their property, but not that of others. In fact that is the only way to achieve equality of self determination.

You've never refuted that. Can you?




Give up on me? Okay. I'll take that as you being unable to defend your contradiction.
What you are really saying is, you cannot refute my premise without blatantly contradicting yourself. I understand.

Then we agree, we are both consensually using the other for our amusement. Excellent.
 

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
A consensus of people who all agree to something which is obviously contradictory doesn't change the contradiction.

Also, your statement that "society" agreed to it, is in error. You continue to conflate society and government edicts as if they are the same thing. They aren't
I think most people believe they should determine the use of their own body and their property, but not that of others. In fact that is the only way to achieve equality of self determination.

You've never refuted that. Can you?




Give up on me? Okay. I'll take that as you being unable to defend your contradiction.
What you are really saying is, you cannot refute my premise without blatantly contradicting yourself. I understand.

Then we agree, we are both consensually using the other for our amusement. Excellent.
 
Top