Proof of failed Republican economic policies, aka where Trump wants to take us

Rob Roy said:
If the interaction is not consensual would there be an element of force ?
Click to expand...

yep, it would originate from the racist store owner not being peaceful because he has a problem with someone's skin color, a hill you are apparently willing to die for but which totally does not make you racist.
 
Justin-case said:
You really suck at this, and look like fool, chester.
Click to expand...

Actually I'm really good at this.

If I sucked at it, I'd do what you do which is avoid questions and conflate things.

You're getting a little boring, how about you call me a racist again and then I can ask you a question you can't answer or I can point out your duplicity and you can run and cry?
 
Rob Roy said:
Actually I'm really good at this.

If I sucked at it, I'd do what you do which is avoid questions and conflate things.

You're getting a little boring, how about you call me a racist again and then I can ask you a question you can't answer or I can point out your duplicity and you can run and cry?
Click to expand...


You must have me confused with someone else, Chester.
 
UncleBuck said:
yep, it would originate from the racist store owner not being peaceful because he has a problem with someone's skin color, a hill you are apparently willing to die for but which totally does not make you racist.
Click to expand...


In your mind "peace" happens when people are made to do things you want them to do, and if they don't you get to make them.
Which is why you're wrong. That's imposed order and not peace.

Peace is when people agree to leave others alone. Which your position clearly doesn't do.
 
Rob Roy said:
In your mind "peace" happens when people are made to do things you want them to do, and if they don't you get to make them.
Which is why you're wrong. That's imposed order and not peace.

Peace is when people agree to leave others alone. Which your position clearly doesn't do.
Click to expand...

what's the most peaceful part of kicking someone out of a store because they are black?
 
UncleBuck said:
did the segregation that happened before civil rights harm black people?
Click to expand...


Anytime people who wish to associate are prevented from doing so and anytime people who wish not to associate are forced to do so, it's likely there is harm being done.
 
UncleBuck said:
what's the most peaceful part of kicking someone out of a store because they are black?
Click to expand...


Complex question but you asked it to try to create some sensationalism. Not really even clever, Poopy Pants.

The first question you should ask, is who owns the property involved and the second question you should ask is does anybody have the right to force another person to use their body and their property to serve another person against their will? Which is sort of what slavery did.
 
Rob Roy said:
Anytime people who wish to associate are prevented from doing so and anytime people who wish not to associate are forced to do so, it's likely there is harm being done.
Click to expand...

i asked you a yes or no question. either segregation harmed black people, or it did not.

thanks for not being a pussy and actually answering the question.
 
Rob Roy said:
Complex question but you asked it to try to create some sensationalism. Not really even clever, Poopy Pants.

The first question you should ask, is who owns the property involved and the second question you should ask is does anybody have the right to force another person to use their body and their property to serve another person against their will? Which is sort of what slavery did.
Click to expand...

i keep asking you questions you refuse to answer. you suck at this.
 
UncleBuck said:
i asked you a yes or no question. either segregation harmed black people, or it did not.

thanks for not being a pussy and actually answering the question.
Click to expand...

I think I answered it, by saying people who would like to associate should be able to.

I think forced segregation, as in preventing people who want to mutually associate from doing so, is wrong. Didn't your government do that? Why yes they did. Then the fucking fools thought they could correct it by forcing people who didn't want to associate to do so. BTW - You're not very bright when you fail to see how much like a segregationist you are.
 
Rob Roy said:
I think I answered it, by saying people who would like to associate should be able to.

I think forced segregation, as in preventing people who want to mutually associate from doing so, is wrong. Didn't your government do that? Why yes they did. Then the fucking fools thought they could correct it by forcing people who didn't want to associate to do so. BTW - You're not very bright when you fail to see how much like a segregationist you are.
Click to expand...

you're avoiding a simple yes or no question. you really suck at this.

were black people harmed by segregation?
 
Justin-case said:
You must have me confused with someone else, Chester.
Click to expand...
UncleBuck said:
you're avoiding a simple yes or no question. you really suck at this.

were black people harmed by segregation?
Click to expand...

I bet some were. I think if you had even a smidge of extrapolation skills that could have been deduced by my previous answers.

Of course ending forced segregation doesn't mean that forced integration is the proper cure.
 
Rob Roy said:
I bet some were. I think if you had even a smidge of extrapolation skills that could have been deduced by my previous answers.

Of course ending forced segregation doesn't mean that forced integration is the proper cure.
Click to expand...


I think you're a big old pussy, that's afraid of confrontation.

I think you're a pedophile too.
 
UncleBuck said:
why are you too cowardly to say that segregation harmed black people?
Click to expand...

I'm not. You might just be a little slow on the uptake.

Why are you too obtuse to see that forcing people from associating who wish to and forcing people to associate who don't' wish to is essentially the same bad thing due to the removal of the involved individuals being unable to make their own individual choices?
 
ttystikk said:
What I don't understand is the poor man's support for cutting taxes on the rich?
Click to expand...

I pondered this myself for years... i finally came to realization; its classic stockholm syndrome... getting them to see reality again will not be easy as those sunsabitches shifted these peoples whole paradigm to where they truly beleive they must serve the oligarchs and sacrifice for them so the oligarch can take care of them.

Captives often crack eventually and side with their captor...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top