Why do some have problems with people of different color

[twostrokenut]

Travel, not drive. Your context is completely wrong. Your travel is unrestricted; however, the mode by which you travel may be regulated, as in the case with vehicles. Specifically, this is meant to apply to a case where someone is on probation or parole, and has nothing to do with driving. Driving a vehicle is regulated.

You are fucking retarded.

https://casetext.com/case/chicago-coach-co-v-city-of-chicago

Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. Where one undertakes, however, to make a greater use of the public highways for his own private gain, as by the operation of a stage coach, an omnibus, a truck or a motor bus, the State may not only regulate the use of the vehicles on the highway but may prohibit it. A municipality can do so only under a power expressly granted by the State]/quote]

 

[UncleBuck]

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/357/116/case.html

please point out where it says it is your right to drive a car.

or travel by jetpack.

retard.

 

[dagwood45431]

Same color as everyone else.

What color are Australians? They don't bathe so nobody really knows.

 

[Olive Drab Green]

https://casetext.com/case/chicago-coach-co-v-city-of-chicago

You literally just proved me right. Good job, retard.

"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. Where one undertakes, however, to make a greater use of the public highways for his own private gain, as by the operation of a stage coach, an omnibus, a truck or a motor bus, the State may not only regulate the use of the vehicles on the highway but may prohibit it. A municipality can do so only under a power expressly granted by the State. Ex parte Dickey, 76 W. Va. 576."

Please. Stop. Your retardation and mental debilitation is pathetic and pitiable. It's like bullying a kid who brought a baseball bat just for you to beat him with.

 

[Olive Drab Green]

@twostrokenut

 

[twostrokenut]

You literally just proved me right. Good job, retard.

"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. Where one undertakes, however, to make a greater use of the public highways for his own private gain, as by the operation of a stage coach, an omnibus, a truck or a motor bus, the State may not only regulate the use of the vehicles on the highway but may prohibit it. A municipality can do so only under a power expressly granted by the State. Ex parte Dickey, 76 W. Va. 576."

Please. Stop. Your retardation and mental debilitation is pathetic and pitiable. It's like bullying a kid who brought a baseball bat just for you to beat him with.

You literally just proved me right. Good job, retard.

"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. Where one undertakes, however, to make a greater use of the public highways for his own private gain, as by the operation of a stage coach, an omnibus, a truck or a motor bus, the State may not only regulate the use of the vehicles on the highway but may prohibit it. A municipality can do so only under a power expressly granted by the State. Ex parte Dickey, 76 W. Va. 576."

Please. Stop. Your retardation and mental debilitation is pathetic and pitiable. It's like bullying a kid who brought a baseball bat just for you to beat him with.

did you catch the distinction between private regulation and commercial prohibition?

You didn't.

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."

Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486

@UncleBuck
"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579

 

[UncleBuck]

https://casetext.com/case/chicago-coach-co-v-city-of-chicago

did you catch the distinction between private regulation and commercial prohibition?

You didn't.

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."

Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486

@UncleBuck
"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579

Driving a car is not a right. It's a "privledge"

 

[twostrokenut]

Driving a car is not a right. It's a "privledge"

that's what your signature of "endorsement" is needed for, correct.

 

[twostrokenut]

I love the smell of epiphanies in the evening.

 

[Heil Tweetler]

I love the smell of epiphanies in the evening.

Fancy! You should initiate a poetry thread.

 

[Olive Drab Green]

did you catch the distinction between private regulation and commercial prohibition?

You didn't.

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."

Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486

@UncleBuck
"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579

So are you saying you don't need a license to drive a car? Because if you're that stupid, I'll pull up the regulations and penalties for driving without a license to educate your dumb ass.

Ever heard the phrase "your driving privileges are revoked/suspended?"

And did you seriously just try to use Ernesto Miranda's case in an irrelevant fashion? Do you even know what Miranda Rights are?

 

[Olive Drab Green]

I guess when your driver's license has been revoked due to drunk driving, you forget what the laws are regarding driving.

Rob Roy has an excuse, too, since he was born before cars existed and he's become senile.

 

[twostrokenut]

So are you saying you don't need a license to drive a car? Because if you're that stupid, I'll pull up the regulations and penalties for driving without a license to educate your dumb ass.

Ever heard the phrase "your driving privileges are revoked/suspended?"

And did you seriously just try to use Ernesto Miranda's case in an irrelevant fashion? Do you even know what Miranda Rights are?

which state are you going to pull those penalties and regs from?????

that's all current federal law....which you fought for. the constitution protects your right to CONTRACT. you contracted away a right into a privilege.....your problem not mine.

 

[Olive Drab Green]

which state are you going to pull those penalties and regs from?????

that's all current federal law....which you fought for. the constitution protects your right to CONTRACT. you contracted away a right into a privilege.....your problem not mine.

The Constitution doesn't protect your right to drive without a license. And you still live in a state, and I guarantee under that state law, you cannot legally drive without a license. It isn't a contract, it's law. You're retarded if you think State Law isn't applicable to you.

You live in California, I believe. So I'll grab Cali laws for you.

"
California Vehicle Code Section 12500 VC: Driving Without A License

1. Definition and Elements of the Crime

As anyone who has spent hours waiting in line at the DMV can attest to, obtaining and/or renewing a valid California driver’s license can often be inconvenient and time-consuming. However, all California drivers (and those who permanently move to California from out-of-state) are required to have a valid California driver’s license. Those caught driving without a license can be criminally prosecuted under California Vehicle Code Section 12500 VC.

In order to prove that a defendant is guilty of driving without a license, a prosecutor must be able to prove following elements:

1. The defendant drove a motor vehicle on a highway
2. When the defendant drove, he or she did not hold a valid California driver’s license
3. AND the defendant was not excused from the requirement to have a California driver’s license

The term highway refers to any area that is publicly maintained and open to the public for the purposes of vehicular travel, including streets. A motor vehicle would include a passenger vehicle, motorcycle, motor scooter, bus, school bus, commercial vehicle, truck tractor and trailer.

2. Related Offenses

Similar offenses include the following:

1. Driving on a Suspended or Revoked License - California Vehicle Code Section 14601 VC
2. Failing to Present Driver’s License – California Vehicle Code Section 12951 VC"

 

[dagwood45431]

I love the smell of my panties in the evening.

 

[twostrokenut]

The Constitution doesn't protect your right to drive without a license. And you still live in a state, and I guarantee under that state law, you cannot legally drive without a license. It isn't a contract, it's law. You're retarded if you think State Law isn't applicable to you.

You live in California, I believe. So I'll grab Cali laws for you.

you have a right to travel, already documented....by "any proficient means of the day" including autos and anything else that develops.......like jetpacks.

same for the right to bear arms...would you not agree these are rights?

let's say you have no money to pay for a firearms "license".....are you really saying no money equals no rights?

You are.

 

[Olive Drab Green]

By the way, @twostrokenut , here's where the Constitution says you have to have a license, according to state law:

"The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] It expresses the principle of federalismand states' rights, which strictly supports the entire plan of the original Constitution for the United States of America, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people."

 

[Olive Drab Green]

you have a right to travel, already documented....by "any proficient means of the day" including autos and anything else that develops.......like jetpacks.

same for the right to bear arms...would you not agree these are rights?

let's say you have no money to pay for a firearms "license".....are you really saying no money equals no rights?

You are.

The Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Your state (and all other states) has deemed it illegal to drive without a license. You are retarded.

 

[UncleBuck]

how did this thread go from how twopump doesn't want to sit next to "purples" because he'll just "hate 'em more now" to his retarded conspiracy theories about unlicensed jetpacks?

 

[Olive Drab Green]

how did this thread go from how twopump doesn't want to sit next to "purples" because he'll just "hate 'em more now" to his retarded conspiracy theories about unlicensed jetpacks?

Somewhere in between, Twopump drank a cocktail of vodka and donkey semen and forgot where he was going with the nonsensical conversation. He also started sucking Rob Roy's dick because he idolizes Rob Roy and his backwards ideas of freedom.