Impeachment of Donald J Trump **Official Thread**

S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
BigPunkin said:
Jared kushner hiring a lawyer proves what exactly? You keep saying "my new account"; that is implying that i have had an account here previously, which i have not.
Click to expand...
Um, that he's fucked and he kind of suspects? That you can't set up back channel to kremlin regarding the 285M loan from a Russian bank that's not a bank by getting in the trunk, riding to Russian compound in DC, so you can have a secure line back to said kremlin?

Where there's smoke there's fire..and this is what they're LETTING us know.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
BigPunkin said:
According to his Lawyer, trump isn't under investigation, despite that tweet. "That tweet was in response to a Washington Post story that ran with five unnamed sources,"
-CNN
Click to expand...
So he's getting his information from the newspapers rather than his own intelligence sources?

I thought unnamed sources couldn't be trusted and are fake news. You can't have it both ways.
 
BigPunkin

BigPunkin

Member
UncleBuck said:
according to trump's lawyer, he is under investigation.

CHRIS WALLACE: I want to ask you a direct question: Does the president think that [Deputy Attorney General] Rod Rosenstein has done anything wrong?

SEKULOW: So here's the constitutional threshold question, Chris. The president takes action based on numerous events, including recommendations from his attorney general and the deputy attorney general’s office. He takes the action that they also, by the way, recommended. And now he's being investigated by the Department of Justice because the special counsel under the special counsel relations reports still to the Department of Justice.Not an independent counsel. So he's being investigated for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take by the agency who recommended the termination.






retard!
Click to expand...
Good Morning!

Why do you only want to partially quote only a small bit of the conversation between Sekulow and Chris?

So here's the constitutional threshold question, Chris. The president takes action based on numerous events, including recommendations from his attorney general and the deputy attorney general’s office. He takes the action that they also, by the way, recommended. And now he's being investigated by the Department of Justice because the special counsel under the special counsel relations reports still to the Department of Justice. Not an independent counsel. So he's being investigated [for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take by the agency who recommended the termination. So that's the constitutional threshold question here. That’s why, as I said, no investigation] —

WALLACE: Well, I — what — what — what's the question [inaudible]. I mean you — you stated — you stated some facts. First of all, you’ve now said that he is getting investigated after saying that you didn’t.

SEKULOW: No.

WALLACE: You — you just, sir, that he’s being —

SEKULOW: No, he's not being investigated!

WALLACE: You just said that he’s being investigated.

SEKULOW: No, Chris, I said that the — any — let me be crystal clear so you — you completely understand. We have not received nor are we aware of any investigation of the president of the United States, period.

WALLACE: Sir, you just said two times that he's being investigated.

SEKULOW: No. The context of the tweet, I just gave you the legal theory, Chris, of how the Constitution works. If, in fact, it was correct that the president was being investigated, he would be investigating for taking action that an agency told him to take. So that is protected under the Constitution as his article one power. That's all I said. So I appreciate you trying to rephrase it, but I’m just being really direct with you, Chris. This is — let me be —

WALLACE: No, I — I — sir, I didn't rephrase it. The tape will speak — Jay, the tape will speak for itself. You said he is being investigated. And it’s not that big —

SEKULOW: Chris, he is — just — no, Chris — that’s [inaudible] unfair, Chris.

WALLACE: Wait a minute — wait a minute. Jay, and it’s not — Jay, it's not just being investigated for firing Comey. There's also the question of what he said to Comey when Comey was still the FBI director. So there's more than just the fact that he fired Comey.

SEKULOW: He — Chris, let me be clear, you asked me a question about what the president's tweet was regarding the deputy attorney general of the United States. That's what you asked me. And I responded to what that legal theory would be. So I do not appreciate you putting words in my mouth when I've been crystal clear that the president is not and has not been under investigation. I don't think I can be any clearer than that.

WALLACE: Well, you don't know that he's not under investigation again, sir. I mean you might —

SEKULOW: You know, I can't read the mind — you’re right, Chris, I can’t read the minds of the special prosecutor.

WALLACE: Well, then, good, okay, so we’re in agreement, you don't know whether he’s under — you don’t know whether he’s under investigation.

SEKULOW: But I have not been notified. No one has been notified that he is.

WALLACE: You don’t know whether he’s under investigation or not.
Click to expand...
Hope you don't mind me asking,do you happen to work for CNN, and was you one of the 3 Journalist that recently "resigned" over the fake Russia story?
 
Last edited:
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
Um, that he's fucked and he kind of suspects? That you can't set up back channel to kremlin regarding the 285M loan from a Russian bank that's not a bank by getting in the trunk, riding to Russian compound in DC, so you can have a secure line back to said kremlin?

Where there's smoke there's fire..and this is what they're LETTING us know.
Click to expand...
Pretty good summary.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
on the basis of sowell's racism, not his skin color.

and you have stated unequivocally that you think it should be legal to deny service to someone based on their skin color.

so how can you even try to feign outrage over that?

are you literally fucking retarded?
Click to expand...
Wont serve Thomas Sowell "because he is racist".

We get it, you won't serve......LL Cool J, Don King, Larry Elder, Jay Fayza, Alfonzo Rachel, Tommy Sotomayor, Karl Malone, Jimmy Walker, Jesse Lee Peterson or Alveda King.

Clearly black republicans are not welcome where you are.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BigPunkin said:
Good Morning!

Why do you only want to partially quote only a small bit of the conversation between Sekulow and Chris?



Hope you don't mind me asking,do you happen to work for CNN, and was you one of the 3 Journalist that recently "resigned" over the fake Russia story?
Click to expand...
trump's own lawyer said about trump:

And now he's being investigated by the Department of Justice...So he's being investigated
 
BigPunkin

BigPunkin

Member
UncleBuck said:
trump's own lawyer said about trump:

And now he's being investigated by the Department of Justice...So he's being investigated [for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take by the agency who recommended the termination. So that's the constitutional threshold question here. That’s why, as I said, no investigation]
Click to expand...
UncleBuck No - No he didn't. You chose to quote not even 1 percent of what he actually said, leaving out key parts. You skimmed through it looking for keywords to make your argument appear valid so you can say, 'HAHA TOLD YOU SO!' so you can look cool and intelligent in front of your minions. But unlike yourself, and many of your minions, i actually take time to read what has been presented to me, so i don't look like a halfwit.

"SEKULOW: So here's the constitutional threshold question, Chris. The president takes action based on numerous events, including recommendations from his attorney general and the deputy attorney general’s office. He takes the action that they also, by the way, recommended. And now he's being investigated by the Department of Justice because the special counsel under the special counsel relations reports still to the Department of Justice. Not an independent counsel. So he's being investigated [for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take by the agency who recommended the termination. So that's the constitutional threshold question here. That’s why, as I said, no investigation] —

WALLACE: Well, I — what — what — what's the question [inaudible]. I mean you — you stated — you stated some facts. First of all, you’ve now said that he is getting investigated after saying that you didn’t.

SEKULOW: No.

WALLACE: You — you just, sir, that he’s being —

SEKULOW: No, he's not being investigated!

WALLACE: You just said that he’s being investigated.

SEKULOW: No, Chris, I said that the — any — let me be crystal clear so you — you completely understand. We have not received nor are we aware of any investigation of the president of the United States, period.

WALLACE: Sir, you just said two times that he's being investigated.

SEKULOW: No. The context of the tweet, I just gave you the legal theory, Chris, of how the Constitution works. If, in fact, it was correct that the president was being investigated, he would be investigating for taking action that an agency told him to take. So that is protected under the Constitution as his article one power. That's all I said. So I appreciate you trying to rephrase it, but I’m just being really direct with you, Chris. This is — let me be —

WALLACE: No, I — I — sir, I didn't rephrase it. The tape will speak — Jay, the tape will speak for itself. You said he is being investigated. And it’s not that big —

SEKULOW: Chris, he is — just — no, Chris — that’s [inaudible] unfair, Chris.

WALLACE: Wait a minute — wait a minute. Jay, and it’s not — Jay, it's not just being investigated for firing Comey. There's also the question of what he said to Comey when Comey was still the FBI director. So there's more than just the fact that he fired Comey.

SEKULOW: He — Chris, let me be clear, you asked me a question about what the president's tweet was regarding the deputy attorney general of the United States. That's what you asked me. And I responded to what that legal theory would be. So I do not appreciate you putting words in my mouth when I've been crystal clear that the president is not and has not been under investigation. I don't think I can be any clearer than that.

WALLACE: Well, you don't know that he's not under investigation again, sir. I mean you might —

SEKULOW: You know, I can't read the mind — you’re right, Chris, I can’t read the minds of the special prosecutor.

WALLACE: Well, then, good, okay, so we’re in agreement, you don't know whether he’s under — you don’t know whether he’s under investigation.

SEKULOW: But I have not been notified. No one has been notified that he is.

WALLACE: You don’t know whether he’s under investigation or not."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top