SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Republicans and their proxies are only into one kind of colon...and they hate themselves for it.
Padaraper even duct tapes stuff open to see more colons.
Republicans and their proxies are only into one kind of colon...and they hate themselves for it.
hold on, let's just abandon our base to cater to a bigoted old white fucktard whose dick doesn't work.How about a progressive message that includes a balanced budget, recognizing that whatever taxation policy we have historically had, tax income as a percent of gdp has rarely exceeded 20%, so some cuts will likely be needed? I'd be into that.
ha ha, you still got it! Keep them coming if it makes you feel better.hold on, let's just abandon our base to cater to a bigoted old white fucktard whose dick doesn't work.
abolishing ICE will not be a hard decision at all.Probably can't cut enough from defense to cover the wish list of social programs, so some hard choices would still be required. But I'm with you on sentiment. The military budget process is pretty fucked up from anecdotes I've heard from military friends.
Good post. I can abide by that. Isn't it fun to agree?abolishing ICE will not be a hard decision at all.
your dick doesn't work.Good post. I can abide by that. Isn't fun to agree?
Where in the country are you talking about?That's not the question he asked
"So let's say the dems decide not to take money from corporations or superpacs while the repubs still do. You think dems can match them in fundraising?"
The question is can Democratic candidates match Republicans in fundraising without accepting money from special interests
The answer is yes
What would that have to do with anything? Just curious on your logic.your dick doesn't work.
I'd like to see that too. Also a bill like that with a chance of passing through the GOP congress. I don't care which party writes it, I'd just like to see one that could become law.How about a progressive message that includes a balanced budget, recognizing that whatever taxation policy we have historically had, tax income as a percent of gdp has rarely exceeded 20%, so some cuts will likely be needed? I'd be into that.
you're right, your impotent dick doesn't have anything to do. but that's kind of a tautology.What would that have to do with anything?
I like your humor!you're right, your impotent dick doesn't have anything to do. but that's kind of a tautology.
That you can't even masturbate during your cuck sessions?What would that have to do with anything? Just curious on your logic.
You didn't even know what position the party or the candidate took and spoke about on CU. You are not a reliable judge of the Democratic message. Understand it, then criticize. Not the other way around. Thanks.Maybe they'd be doing better if they actually supported a progressive message instead of just reminding everyone how bad Trump and the Republicans are?
The establishment Democratic message is that they have to take corporate bribes to compete with Republicans, just like the establishment Democrats are supporting here. They give lip service to the idea that they oppose money in politics while... accepting money from special interests.You didn't even know what position the party or the candidate took and spoke about on CU. You are not a reliable judge of the Democratic message. Understand it, then criticize. Not the other way around. Thanks.
you're not using words correctly, retard.corporate bribes
they voted unanimously to put citizens united in the dumpster you fucking retard. a vote is not just lip service.They give lip service to the idea that they oppose money in politics
Just a quick question.The establishment Democratic message is that they have to take corporate bribes to compete with Republicans, just like the establishment Democrats are supporting here. They give lip service to the idea that they oppose money in politics while... accepting money from special interests.
The only way to see if they're lying is to wait until Democrats hold control of government. We'll see what they really believe soon enough, and when they don't make campaign finance reform one of their top political priorities when the time comes, what will your excuse be then? They couldn't put the political capital up? They had other more important things? We'll see..
I witnessed what the DNC did with my own eyes. Others choose to ignore it even though every measure we can look at today supports it. Lower approval numbers, now, lower levels of fundraising since 2003.. Something is obviously happening with American opinion towards the Democratic party. I suppose they would have you believe everyone has just succumbed to propaganda.. that's an easy excuse not to make any policy changesJust a quick question.
Do you believe you still have objectivity when reviewing facts about the DNC?
Your not corrupted like a bad memory card or anything, right?
Because if you were a computer, I'd run a systems check on you based on your posts through 2015 compared to the last 18 months.
I'm not making a dig here, it's just a comparative observation.
The dude has definitely lost come clusters.Just a quick question.
Do you believe you still have objectivity when reviewing facts about the DNC?
Your not corrupted like a bad memory card or anything, right?
Because if you were a computer, I'd run a systems check on you based on your posts through 2015 compared to the last 18 months.
I'm not making a dig here, it's just a comparative observation.
Ya think?Something is obviously happening
Yet you choose to ignore it and blame everything except Democratic leadership for the failures of the party..Ya think?