Trump wrestling gif creator doxxed by CNN

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
tampee said:
Don't need to believe me. I know its a little difficult but you most certainly can research it and see just how many nations are at war. Might just be more nations than WW2 already in the early years of this new world war.
Click to expand...
You compare what's going on today to WWII?

WTF, dude. The world has been a scary place for a really, really long time. Did you just recently learn how to read?
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Most of them don't even know what doxing actually is.

If there is no malicious attempt to bring harm to an individual (i.e. "here's where he lives, go kick his ass") then there is no doxing.

Simply saying, "all that racist bullshit was posted by ---insert name--- of Detroit, Michigan" is not doxing. It's just a statement of fact; nothing more.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
bundee1 said:
And all of a sudden he's sorry. After how many repeated posts does someone's trolling become their everyday thoughts?
This dude is a veteran with a family and is totally embarrassed by what he posted. Bullshit. What about all the racist goons taking his message and harrassing others because of it? His mouth gets him into shit and he thinks the repercussions end at his mea culpa. God you racists are stupid as fuck because your whole premise is stupid as fuck.
Click to expand...
Another internet tough guy. My guess is that his job would have been on the line if he didn't do some damage control and say all the right things. Just another dumb fuck. We see them here all the time. What they say in public is different from what they say on line and, unfortunately, in the voting booth.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i applaud CNN for using their first amendment rights!

View attachment 3972827

retards like twopump will get all pissy and indignant and claim they are against "doxxing" (which CNN didn't even do) even though they celebrated wikileaks and all sorts of worse behavior just 6 months ago!
Click to expand...
That 22M is just the first 24 months. In ten years CBO estimated 70M would be without.

The GOP catch phrase is 'access to'..not affordability.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Most of them don't even know what doxing actually is.

If there is no malicious attempt to bring harm to an individual (i.e. "here's where he lives, go kick his ass") then there is no doxing.

Simply saying, "all that racist bullshit was posted by ---insert name--- of Detroit, Michigan" is not doxing. It's just a statement of fact; nothing more.
Click to expand...
I think it is when someone is using a username other than their real name. It would fall under 'private' because his identity was revealed. That would be an identifier. Malicious intent is not necessary.

dox
däks/
verb
informal
gerund or present participle: doxxing
  1. search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
    "hackers and online vigilantes routinely dox both public and private figures"
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
I think it is when someone is using a username other than their real name. It would fall under 'private' because his identity was revealed. That would be an identifier. Malicious intent is not necessary.

dox
däks/
verb
informal
gerund or present participle: doxxing
  1. search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
    "hackers and online vigilantes routinely dox both public and private figures"
Click to expand...
You're a mental case. Let's examine YOUR OPINION:

schuylaar said:
Malicious intent is not necessary.
Click to expand...
Then you posted a definition that says:
schuylaar said:
typically with malicious intent.
Click to expand...
In the U.S., if you're over the age of 18 then you are fair game. Anybody can post your name, address, phone number, whatever they want wherever they want as long as it's all public domain information.

His was. He had a publicly posted Facebook account, Reddit account, multiple other accounts, all of which HE PUBLISHED PUBLICLY HIMSELF.

When you put up your information all over the internet in the public domain, it is not possible for you to be doxed so long as you are not a minor UNLESS there is malicious intent involved.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
You're a mental case. Let's examine YOUR OPINION:



Then you posted a definition that says:


In the U.S., if you're over the age of 18 then you are fair game. Anybody can post your name, address, phone number, whatever they want wherever they want as long as it's all public domain information.

His was. He had a publicly posted Facebook account, Reddit account, multiple other accounts, all of which HE PUBLISHED PUBLICLY HIMSELF.

When you put up your information all over the internet in the public domain, it is not possible for you to be doxed so long as you are not a minor UNLESS there is malicious intent involved.
Click to expand...
Why do you call me names? 'Typically with' doesn't mean 'always' which was the point you missed.

Are you an attorney?..just curious.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
redivider said:
I think the word you were looking for was blackmail.

Extorsion is when you are expected to pay a 'protection fee' or else face some sort of consequence.

Blackmail is usually characterized by the accumulation of potentially embarrassing personal details, and using the threat of public release of those details to influence the actions of others. no money is involved.

Let's be clear, CNN is still one of the biggest news organizations in the world and they are filled with very determined investigators - so finding out who this person was, legally or otherwise, would not be hard for an organization like CNN.

However, if CNN contacted this person, and just told him/her "We hope you can apologize for creating that GIF, we know you are a good guy" then there was no direct order and no blackmail can be proven.
Click to expand...
i wasn't looking for a word, but I'm glad you know some.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Oh no! They made him face the consequences of his shitty actions?!?! Why?! Why God?!?!?

If you fear taking responsibility for your actions, then you did something immoral and/or unethical.

Remember when conservatives were all about personal responsibility? Then they elected a silver spoon, openly misogynist, business failing narcissist that never admits a mistake.
Click to expand...
idk I see your point. i am very much fiscally conservative....liberal everywhere else. prolly more so than most here, try me.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Complete, total and utter bullshit as usual. Here's the REAL story of what went down:



Nobody extorted anybody. He is a stupid, racist, redneck asshole that posted a bunch of bullshit online thinking he was smarter than everybody else that got caught with a simple Facebook search.
Click to expand...
awesome, the more info the better you legal scholar you....would you not agree? let's help the member I responded to have all the info. thanks in advance, love twostroke.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Most of them don't even know what doxing actually is.

If there is no malicious attempt to bring harm to an individual (i.e. "here's where he lives, go kick his ass") then there is no doxing.

Simply saying, "all that racist bullshit was posted by ---insert name--- of Detroit, Michigan" is not doxing. It's just a statement of fact; nothing more.
Click to expand...
ever been to a sports bar in Charlotte with your username?
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
I think it is when someone is using a username other than their real name. It would fall under 'private' because his identity was revealed. That would be an identifier. Malicious intent is not necessary.

dox
däks/
verb
informal
gerund or present participle: doxxing
  1. search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
    "hackers and online vigilantes routinely dox both public and private figures"
Click to expand...
yep, way more accurate about intent. original intent is who was doxxed and their intent on revealing their personal info.

with that established any intent to reveal could be considered malicious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top